This is why I'm not going to give a vote here. If not even the author can sync their own TAS, then that's possibly grounds for rejection.
The poll is about whether you think the TAS is entertaining or not, and you should vote even if you're not sure the TAS will be acceptable for technical reasons.
Tom Lube wrote:
If I recall correctly the question posed at the top of this thread is 'Did you find this movie entertaining' not 'Do you want to reject this movie based on its ability to sync?'
Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
If I recall correctly, Egix stated he wasn't going to be voting at all, and thus the oft-maligned voting question should not have been brought up to him twice.
Yes of course, but why mention it at all if you are not going to vote? Seems like entering a restaurant and announcing your decision not to eat there that day.
This is why I'm not going to give a vote here. If not even the author can sync their own TAS, then that's possibly grounds for rejection.
If I recall correctly the question posed at the top of this thread is 'Did you find this movie entertaining' not 'Do you want to reject this movie based on its ability to sync?'
Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.
I feel like it's kinda silly to argue about minor things making a TAS ineligible - if someone can confirm that the gameplay is legitimate I don't see why the final product can't be accepted.
Great TAS - two of the best games received huge TAS's very shortly away from each other, haha.
Actually really impressed by this TAS and amused to see that a strategy I figured was 'probably possible' in the room at 5 minutes in was actually doable. Well done :)