Ok well.. this is my opinion.
The movie is played well. The movie is short. It was nice to watch once i knew what in the world was going on. It wasn't all that boring.
But on the other hand, the game is really bad and pointless. as soon as you finish it it starts over again?.. terrible.
But because of its length, I see nothing wrong with this getting published. Voting yes.
I actually found this awesome :). I loved this game when i was a kid, and the first time ive seen the rollar blade one beaten ever.
Also, i can't imagine doing all those stunts on the BMX track :).
A for sure Yes.
Well.. as you know what i have said to you before, I wont mention it. BUT.. I think you drove the 101% madness to its limits (not including what I said). I was surprised and even impressed in most parts of the movie. even though, i hate those water levels :(.
Still enough for a yes vote from me. good job.
But my point is, How can a movie be entertaining if it doesn't add anything really "New". If it LOOKS like the previous movie, how can that be considered entertainment. No doubt, 19 frames is a great improvement, but that isn't the question.
.
And even if Phil's or Sleepz' run was somehow more entertaining... Donamer's is still faster.
Ok folks. from now on. Take all the entertainment out of movies and just go for speed. Make all the movies 1 frame faster. they should be accepted right schneelocke? "its faster!"
Donamers run is hardly any different from Phils run.
And exactly how different was Phils run compared with Sleepz run?
As i said. I never voted on that movie.
Then you should cease saying you found Donamers run different from Phils because Phils run certainly aint different from Sleepz run. How do you think we felt when we saw Phils run? Was Phils run more entertaining than Sleepz run? F*** No. These kind of comments tick me off, I need Anger Management.
Well then. If everyone felt that way about Phils run, why did it get published. But that is totally off topic and about a different movie. Last time i should have voted and commented, but I never. This time i am. And i was no more entertained with Donamers or either Phils run. I was in fact entertained by Sleepz run. But I guess it also depends a persons opinion of entertainment. If a couple frames improvement seems like entertainment to some people, I guess they will vote yes.
But that is not why the Olympics started. It was to see who was the Best in several events, squeezing out split seconds out of races, going for the glory.
But this is not the Olympics. This is about Entertaining the audience. This is about Entertainment. Donamers run is hardly any different from Phils run. Not very noticeable to the Human eye(unless you have them side by side thanks to DeHackEd :) ). But the question was "Did you enjoy the movie?". Seeing the same tricks over and over does not make me enjoy the movie.
If you went to a Movie theatre to watch Spiderman. The first movie was done good. But then a new producer got the same crew, and done everything the same, but made it .3 seconds shorter with no new moves or bosses or scenes or anyting. Everyone would want their money back.
Please look at it that way. I stand by my vote.
wow...I see hardly any difference from Phils..
[edit with reason]The reason i voted no was because the question is "Did you enjoy watching the movie?"
I did not enjoy watching the movie because I already enjoyed it when i watched Phils and Sleepz. I never voted on Phils(I dont think) because it was almost a second improvement. But this one is not. I was not entertained due to i have seen this before.
Bring em on then. If people can keep pushing this game to in under 30 seconds I will be happy :).(even though I am happy with the improvements made already :) )
Maybe because when they submit it, they CANT think of anyway to make it faster.
Plus, I like wars. They are friendly competition with each other trying to squeeze out frames. Like Goonies 1(I think between Phil and Walker Boh). They test the TASer to think faster then usual, and more unhuman than usual.
Hes already hit a homerun.
IMO, This movie shows EXTREMELY NON human like play. Extremely difficult to do in person. People sent hours on playin this game, while it can be beaten in 31 seconds. This is very short, and it does not lose the viewer. I don;t see why you have a problem with this game atro city.
