Posts for moozooh


Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
That was… an interesting run… yeah. Yes vote.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
Bisqwit wrote:
nitsuja wrote:
Allow me to demonstrate: flyswattest.avi
404
Works here. Funny video, BTW. :)
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
Right, it would only matter if he decides to come back. :)
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
Bisqwit wrote:
Not as cool as in Japan though.
True. But all of them are for the inner market, and they become essentially useless if you leave the coverage zone. That being said, the SIM is hardcoded into them, just like in the early to middle 90s.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
Highness wrote:
So is the DMA transfer one of the issues? If those warnings are showing it's possible to fool the game somehow right?
Hmm, like saving on the frames on which the DMA transfer does not occur? It depends on how long does it take…
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
MahaTmA wrote:
According to the old version I have lying around, the total taxation has at times risen over 100%.
Umm, how's that?
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
At last, Metroid Prime in H.264! I'd also have kip's run recaptured, but oh well… So which of those three looks more novel compared to all the others at SDA?
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
AKA wrote:
and some fancy moves that could be done over humps
Hmm, just thought about Road Rash! There was a lot of bumps that could throw you in the air for a significant amount of time if manipulated correctly, but it wasn't too useful due to the game's linearuty.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
Mukki wrote:
I think the best way to combat this is to set a page beside the wishlist that lists all GAMES (not movies) submitted/suggested/requested that have been rejected/cancelled due to the fact that the games themselves do not make good TASes.
Dude, that's the best idea ever. Almost. But still, definitely worth working on it.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
Paused wrote:
Considering one of the major reasons the recent all emerald run im Sonic 1 was rejected was due to it being too similar to the run by JXQ, including all rings would likley mean an 100% run would be accepted.
But Sonic 1 is so slow, why even bother doing that?
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
NecroVMX wrote:
You basically set up a way that it could never be published (which is unfair, every run should have an equal chance)
Every run? Maybe. Every game? No. There are games that provide high entertainment value by themselves due to various reasons such as variety (mainly variety!), good look, etc. Some games are just too repetitive for a run. Try sorting movies by their rating and find the general patterns. Proving your leet skillz in controlling a car in realtime in front of your friends and doing that is a TAS for 20 minutes isn't the same. Therefore, some games will never make a good TAS.
NecroVMX wrote:
so it gets rejected, despite being far newer than most runs on the workbench and most of the votes being yes.
Actually, no votes are far more informative, because they indicate that a run isn't that interesting, or it contains a mistake. It is worth mentioning that a yes vote doesn't always indicate the contrary. For example, this submission was rejected despite of the majority of the yes votes mainly because it didn't show high enough variety to be published alongside the any% run (though its technical quality was even superior!). Of course, a judge always have the final word (because he's a judge, duh), but when he is undecided, he relies primarily on the votes, that's why it's always good to vote more and informatively explain your vote.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
Bisqwit wrote:
January 1st! January 2nd! January 3rd! January 4th! January 5th! January 6th! January 7th! January 8th! January 9th! January 10th! January 11th! January 12th! January 13th! January 14th! January 15th! January 16th! January 17th! January 18th! January 19th! January 20th! January 21st! January 22nd! January 23rd! January 24th! January 25th! January 26th! January 27th! January 28th! January 29th! January 30th! January 31st! February 1st! February 2nd! February 3rd! February 4th! February 5th! February 6th! February 7th! February 8th! February 9th! February 10th! February 11th! February 12th! February 13th! February 14th! February 15th! February 16th! February 17th! February 18th! February 19th! February 20th! February 21st! February 22nd! February 23rd! February 24th! February 25th! February 26th! February 27th! February 28th! February 29th! March 1st! March 2nd! March 3rd! March 4th! March 5th! March 6th! March 7th! March 8th! March 9th! March 10th! March 11th! March 12th! March 13th! March 14th! March 15th! March 16th! March 17th! March 18th! March 19th! March 20th! March 21st! March 22nd! March 23rd! March 24th! March 25th! March 26th! March 27th! March 28th! March 29th! March 30th! March 31st! April 1st! April 2nd! April 3rd! April 4th! April 5th! April 6th! April 7th! April 8th! April 9th! April 10th! April 11th! April 12th! April 13th! April 14th! April 15th! April 16th! April 17th! April 18th! April 19th! April 20th! April 21st! April 22nd! April 23rd! April 24th! April 25th! April 26th! April 27th! April 28th! April 29th! April 30th! May 1st! May 2nd! May 3rd! May 4th! May 5th! May 6th! May 7th! May 8th! May 9th! May 10th! May 11th! May 12th! May 13th! May 14th! May 15th! May 16th! May 17th! May 18th! May 19th! May 20th! May 21st! May 22nd! May 23rd! May 24th! May 25th! May 26th! May 27th! May 28th! May 29th! May 30th! May 31st! June 1st! June 2nd! June 3rd! June 4th! June 5th! June 6th! June 7th! June 8th! June 9th! June 10th! June 11th! June 12th! June 13th! June 14th! June 15th! June 16th! June 17th! June 18th! June 19th! June 20th! June 21st! June 22nd! June 23rd! June 24th! June 25th! June 26th! June 27th! June 28th! June 29th! June 30th! July 1st! July 2nd! July 3rd! July 4th! July 5th! July 6th! July 7th! July 8th! July 9th! July 10th! July 11th! July 12th! July 13th! July 14th! July 15th! July 16th! July 17th! July 18th! July 19th! July 20th! July 21st! July 22nd! July 23rd! July 24th! July 25th! July 26th! July 27th! July 28th! July 29th! July 30th! July 31st! August 1st! August 2nd! August 3rd! August 4th! August 5th! August 6th! August 7th! August 8th! August 9th! August 10th! August 11th! August 12th! August 13th! August 14th! August 15th! August 16th! August 17th! August 18th! August 19th! August 20th! August 21st! August 22nd! August 23rd! August 24th! August 25th! August 26th! August 27th! August 28th! August 29th! August 30th! August 31st! September 1st! September 2nd! September 3rd! September 4th! September 5th! September 6th! September 7th! September 8th! September 9th! September 10th! September 11th! September 12th! September 13th! September 14th! September 15th! September 16th! September 17th! September 18th! September 19th! September 20th! September 21st! September 22nd! September 23rd! September 24th! September 25th! September 26th! September 27th! September 28th! September 29th! September 30th! October 1st! October 2nd! October 3rd! October 4th! October 5th! October 6th! October 7th! October 8th! October 9th! October 10th! October 11th! October 12th! October 13th! October 14th! October 15th! October 16th! October 17th! October 18th! October 19th! October 20th! October 21st! October 22nd! October 23rd! October 24th! October 25th! October 26th! October 27th! October 28th! October 29th! October 30th! October 31st! November 1st! November 2nd! November 3rd! November 4th! November 5th! November 6th! November 7th! November 8th! November 9th! November 10th! November 11th! November 12th! November 13th! November 14th! November 15th! November 16th! November 17th! November 18th! November 19th! November 20th! November 21st! November 22nd! November 23rd! November 24th! November 25th! November 26th! November 27th! November 28th! November 29th! November 30th! December 1st! December 2nd! December 3rd! December 4th! December 5th! December 6th! December 7th! December 8th! December 9th! December 10th! December 11th! December 12th! December 13th! December 14th! December 15th! December 16th! December 17th! December 18th! December 19th! December 20th! December 21st! December 22nd! December 23rd! December 24th! December 25th! December 26th! December 27th! December 28th! December 29th! December 30th! December 31st!
I've found Waldo!
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
There's nothing expressly interesting in this movie, because every solution is already predefined by the developers. As a result, every trick is as obvious as it can be. I'd vote yes if you could solve at least half the puzzles in an unexpected way (if the game even allows that; if not, then it's not a good game to TAS). Voting meh.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
Hisatoki clearly has an eye for games way too hard to comprehend! The first minute of the gameplay was somehow connected to the existing King Kong 2 motion picture, but after that everything went into the realm of dark magic, bizarre labyrinths and moronic robots. :D Yes vote.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
Hmm, sounds like a thing that can be switched off in your mouse driver.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Post subject: Re: 2 things
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
SpiDeY wrote:
And I use Opera btw
Middle-click on a link is the easiest thing since sliced bread. ;)
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
Going great, Deign. I won't give you any detailed analysis, however there are several points that I wanted to ask you about: • 57750—57800, can you shoot both blocks to move a bit farther to the left and thus be able to have some more horizontal momentum while falling between the ceiling and the floor? • 66950—67000, that jump looks a bit awkward. Are you sure this place can't be done any faster? • 67723, why do you take damage here, if it obviously slows you down? The rest seems clean to me. Keep up the good work.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
Revoting yes under the previously stated condition. Good job on discovering that strategy.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
kwinse wrote:
Well, this one has different goals then the currently published one. The 0:27 run went for the fastest time, this was a demonstration of how to bankrupt 4 computers well after input actually ended.
I know. Read the submission text to understand what I mean.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Post subject: Re: What's this field for anyways?
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
Kles wrote:
What's this field for anyways?
For IRC notification. ;D
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
S@G wrote:
I can't watch this Movie.
Forget the movie, just read the rejection note.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
I vote for this and for the 0:27 movie to stay. The excellent examples of manipulation.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
Haha, it would be much less time to create a run for submission 1337! Fine run, voting yes.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
TheSwordUser wrote:
If there are 4 of these games TASes, so why you don't want to publish TAS from Rad Racer 2?
There's one strong reason: the general opinion is that RR games suck pretty much. The quality standards of this site are constatnly rising, and one of the judges' primary objectives is to evaluate movies in a way so that the overall quality of the movies on the site will rise, not fall. That doesn't only rely on the technical quality of the run, but also on the entertainment value. And the latter clearly is below the line. Having only one RR run clearly is enough, having both may be not acceptable.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
http://tasvideos.org/movies.cgi?ratingsort=Y. Ownage, man. The overall rating of 9.4 is what I call ownage.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.