Posts for moozooh


Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
I was mostly talking about turning sideways and back all the time so it's impossible to tell the exact direction you're going. (I believe the published Duke Nukem 64 TAS is similar in this regard.) I found scandashes pretty disorienting in unassisted speedruns, but in a TAS they're just going to be faster and more numerous so I guess there's no escaping it. Which is why I'm likely going to agree with Kitsune that at least the 100% should be made on the Wii version to avoid excessive brain damage.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Post subject: Re: Added other crap that you don't care about
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
Awesome improvement! Voting yes.
Flygon wrote:
-2 for the audio.
Say no to -2. An increase in a few hundred kilobyte isn't going to be noticeable, but quality decrease is. Vorbis mutilates high frequency noise at such low bitrates.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
Either way the whole idea of sharing that was paramount to group survival and such has been corrupted by capitalistic approach of concentrating material goods as opposed to distributing them. No wonder people generally grow more selfish in countries where it happens to be the dominant line of behavior.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
But if I do the same with software (share with somebody else and remove it entirely from my possession), I'm still a criminal. What's the deal?
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
FODA wrote:
If by sharing you could give say levels 2 and 3 to a friend, and keep levels 1, 4 and 5 to yourself then it would be the same analogy :)
What if I'm willing to be generous and thus give all my candy to a friend?
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
Warp wrote:
Exactly why should you be able to copy a commercial product for your neighbor without the proper payment? How does the fact that you obtained the game legally affect this in any way? I don't understand. Is your logic that if you buy something legally you should be able to distribute it for free for others? I don't follow.
Yeah, see, when you're a kid and you're given some candy or whatever, you're told that sharing is good and you should give some to your friends, while hogging it up all for yourself is seen as social offense. When you grow up you're told sharing is bad, and in fact is a criminal offense. Follow this one.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
Xkeeper wrote:
I would mean splitting apart for viewer digest. If I want to watch one or two modes, I don't want to sit around and wait for a torrent to download. That's what I'm getting at.
Doesn't matter, make 9 links to a single YT video with timecodes at the start of each mode. I really don't see how 9 submissions are going to be better.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
Xkeeper wrote:
I don't get the "better for the viewer" idea. For me the best version is really like dumping them on YouTube; choose what you want to watch, and start watching it immediately.
You download a chapter'ified MKV, choose whatever mode you need and skip whatever you don't. You vote once, you rate once, you download once and you don't watch things you've already seen. No disadvantages as far as I can see, at least not compared to 9 separate submissions.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
Realistically, this is going to actually get out of hand only in case 1.51 still has desync issues 1.43 doesn't. Otherwise people have been provided with options that will let them not lose their work already done on 1.43. The problem is that we will only be able to test it during the creation of a TAS, which might mean a loss of work…
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
Another vote for no X-ray, though an optimized demonstration of all beneficial points, preferably before the actual progress has been made, would make the decision more informed.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
Making a 9-in-1 Tetris DS submission has more merits for the viewer, while submitting the modes separately has more merits for the TASer… We should probably go with the former but make it possible to accept partially improved movies (where one or several modes are improved, but not all) if it's possible to freely hexedit them in.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
mmbossman wrote:
Although, if we are going to be further discussing and making changes to the site, perhaps these responses should be shunted into a new thread, so that this submission is not further derailed.
Done. I also think I'm going to look for all discussions about TASVideos.org development soon, and index them all in a sticky thread (kind of like here).
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
You can also use IRC without installing anything if you go here: http://webchat.freenode.net/. Type "HappyLee" as your name and #tasvideos as the channel. Also, a vote in favor of level 4. As much as I love Metal Slug 3, the only notable difference level 8 is going to bring is 5+ surplus minutes of repetitive shooting at bosses. Which is something I, and possibly many others, could do without.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
Don't forget that tool-assisted scandashes are going to look very disorienting, close to incomprehensible, due to rapid angle changes and moving sideways.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
Wiimote's cursor's positioning speed is capped by the game's framerate, while GC's thumbstick has a maximum movement speed. Of course, this alone doesn't make the Wii version preferable.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
Ok, wow, for someone who doesn't care about Super Metroid nor find it entertaining at all, Comicalflop sure is the most vocal person. Some more instances of such behavior and I'm going to start suspecting him of being jealous of people who actually do like the game. :D Let me set one thing straight, the apparent "lack of interest" towards low% as a category does not stem from the category being unentertaining and unsuitable for the site. There is one huge underlying reason that covers not only this but other effects that everyone who has observed the development of TASes for the last few years can see. Low% is and has always been one of the least popular categories for TASers to make movies on. Every experienced SM player out there would try to complete at least a draft version of an any% TAS first, the only notable exception being JXQ. Reasons for this are numerous, all of them obvious enough. Low%, while a common goal in many games, remains a niche category, so it either comes last in the priority of TAS-making, or is attempted by people who specifically want to make a low% movie. Since the popularization of memory watch that made optimization and new trick discovery quite a bit easier, the game has enjoyed an influx of new promising players that have or have not made it to the publication in the end. In fact, there haven't been many games on the site that ever had so many experts actively working on them (counting both actual movie-making and research). As a result, new any% movies and WIPs were produced in such ridiculous amounts (considering it's a long and complex game) they essentially made the audience jaded. Obviously, when you have a dozen of people researching the game for years, certain outlines are bound to take place and eventually solidify, making the possible improvements less and less noticeable, especially to the inexperienced eye. It's not helping that some segments, particularly the first and the last few minutes of most runs, are virtually identical. You want a proof of the audience being jaded? Easy, just look at the amount and quality of feedback the first post-Terimakasih TASes got, and the amount they've been getting in the last year or so. Not only did it drop to about 1/3 of its initial amount, most of these 1/3 are more-or-less hardcore Metroid fans (and Comicalflop, who watches every TAS to discover that he dislikes it even more — which to me is dubious behavior because I take for granted that if I dislike one TAS of a given game, I'm not going to watch another; just don't be a victim about it). Anyway, my point is that the category is fine — and has always been. It didn't become less entertaining or technically sound. Quite the opposite. It's just that people are tired of Super Metroid. The thread is nearly dead despite quite a few surprising discoveries posted every few weeks or so. About once a year I reread Michael Flatley's 100% thread or the discussions about Saturn's RBO teasers — the document of milestone discoveries and incredible enthusiasm shared about the whole project by dozens of people, including those who have never been Metroid fans. This enthusiasm is long gone, and, oddly enough, it's the TASers themselves that made it so. As one of the examples of the overwhelming irony that fell upon this submission's fate, Spoofer worked really hard to make this run — the low% — as close to the published any% as possible, because fastest time was his natural goal. The same thing made it less interesting to watch and less valuable as a category. This isn't going to be published, that much is already clear, so we can just drop this discussion and appreciate the run for what it is — a good job by a very talented TASer.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
IIRC, the major reason 14% was not reinstated wasn't because it was an unsuitable category, but because Saturn's run didn't qualify due to a number of criteria that had little to do with 14% as a category. However, with this particular submission the point becomes moot since it follows the same route as the any%, except finishes slower, and is thus not eligible for the "this movie is notably different from the others" clause. And since using Speed Booster also makes it slower than Ice beam… Yeah.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
mz wrote:
As always, expect lots of crashes and desyncs.
That's… awesome news. :D Are there any estimations or, well, at least an advice on when we can expect the otherwise?
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
Sonikkustar wrote:
I get this message when I try to rate a movie.
It seems you've been logged out. Try logging in in a separate tab and refresh the page.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
I'll post a new board list with names and descriptions later today (or earlier tomorrow).
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
VBA and Mednafen don't need subforums, in my opinion. Especially the latter — just look a the amount of threads there.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
phpBB2 is very limited in regards to searching/filtering, so the best thing you can do is restrict the search to <system name> board and put <emulator name> in the search string together with whatever you're searching. On the other hand, that's exactly a sufficient means to filter by tags. At least I don't expect anyone to code additional functionality into it like Bisqwit has already done over these years. (I wonder, though, when will the time come to upgrade our forum software…)
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
upthorn wrote:
Obviously I think it would be good to be able to have all our published TASes viewable in full on youtube. As long as credit is given, the concept of TAS is explained, and none of the TAS authors or encoders object to you putting them up on your account, I am for it.
Agreed with this.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
FCEU and FCEUX are already mixed together and there seems to be no problem (also considering it's one of the most actively discussed emulator). Famtasia has only a few threads, all of which can be tagged, and they're all so old they will be buried deep in the topic list without being an eyesore. A subforum might be an interesting idea but I don't know how warranted it is.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Post subject: Emulator subforum restructuring proposal
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
Ok, not as much restructuring per se as it is optimization. After having cleaned up some of the "orphan" topics in "Other games" and "Other emulators" I realized just how messy the board list is. These suggestions will hopefully help parsing it (both there and at the main forum page) at least visually. 1. Rename "<Emulator>" boards to "<System> emulator: <emulator1> (<emulator2>, <emulator3>)" Example: "Gens" becomes "Genesis emulator: Gens". Rationale: uniformity. 2. Merge all emulators of the same system into one board. Example: "Snes9x" and "ZSNES" become "SNES Emulators: Snes9x, ZSNES, bsnes". Rationale: some of these boards are effectively dead, while other might pop up in case we get alternative rerecording emulators for existing platforms. This will, at the very least, reduce the clutter. I can append relevant tags to all threads to help discern them in merged boards, like it is done with hacks in game boards. y/n?
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.