Posts for moozooh

1 2
90 91 92
229 230
Posted: 5/1/2009 9:43 PM
Quote
moozooh
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
No. I mean that in both cases, the screens will be of the exact same size. Horizontal alignment will not look better (and certainly not in case with sidescrollers, just test it for yourself).
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Posted: 5/1/2009 5:25 PM
Quote
moozooh
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
They won't really be any better, believe me. YouTube's maximum resolution for SD content is 480x360 (accessible via high quality switch or adding "&fmt=18" to the video link). Whether you make two videos on top of each other or side by side, their total pixel count will be 98304 (256*192*2). Both 256x384 (stacked videos) and 512x192 (side by side) will be reduced in resolution to fit into 480x360 bounds. In both cases the resulting video will have a total pixel count of 86400, or 12% reduction. To sum up, putting them side by side won't make them larger, clearer, or otherwise better. Putting them vertically as the DS displays it has a benefit described in this very sentence.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Posted: 5/1/2009 4:42 PM
Quote
moozooh
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
That sucks Shiny, you were one of my favorite encoders around. Anyway, have fun.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Posted: 5/1/2009 4:40 PM
Quote
moozooh
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
I'm sure he waited all these three years for your reply. :)
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Posted: 4/30/2009 9:52 PM
Quote
moozooh
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
4matsy wrote:
By that reasoning, though, GB/SGB/GBC/GBA should be changed to NGB/NSGB/NGBC/NGBA... :p
No, no, no, don't get me wrong. "Nintendo" is the part of the console's name as much as in the case of "Nintendo Entertainment System", "Nintendo 64", and so on.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Posted: 4/30/2009 7:57 PM
Quote
moozooh
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
Well, I can't say I was terribly impressed by the run or the game in general, but it wasn't bad, either. Bonus points for being a first DS TAS! Btw, adelikat, I have some nitpicking to do: the platform acronym should be "NDS", not just "DS".
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Posted: 4/29/2009 6:47 AM
Quote
moozooh
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
I propose glitchless instead of all bosses. All bosses is the same stuff as this, except twice longer. Glitchless is going to be about 3.5-4 hour long, which I suppose will satisfy everyone entertained by grinding.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Posted: 4/28/2009 7:56 PM
Quote
moozooh
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
This was a very, very confusing sight. Well done, inichi! Voting yes very much. :)
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Posted: 4/28/2009 9:30 AM
Quote
moozooh
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
Rush'n Attack?
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Posted: 4/28/2009 8:01 AM
Quote
moozooh
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
That might be due to color palette used. NES only had what, 48-something simultaneous colors onscreen? Tile-based graphics layout also helps a lot with motion estimation. Have you tried Genesis and GBx titles yet?
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Posted: 4/27/2009 7:42 PM
Quote
moozooh
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
Take starred runs, sort by rating.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Posted: 4/27/2009 5:51 PM
Quote
moozooh
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
A top-5 list.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Posted: 4/27/2009 2:32 PM
Quote
moozooh
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
Compressed streams aren't even supposed to be compressible. There must be a mistake somewhere, because ZIP compressing FLAC 4 to 1 is pretty ridiculous by itself.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Posted: 4/26/2009 7:38 PM
Post subject: Re: gb.flac.zip, gb.flac.7z, still compresses well
Quote
moozooh
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
xPi wrote:
24/04/2009 10:37 PM 10,570,987 gia-pkmnyellow.flac 26/04/2009 12:37 AM 1,932,260 gia-pkmnyellow.flac.7z 26/04/2009 01:36 AM 2,410,809 gia-pkmnyellow.flac.zip
What the hell. Seriously, what the hell. o_0
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Posted: 4/25/2009 10:24 AM
Quote
moozooh
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
AnS wrote:
Ok, what about reworded 4 options: No/Meh/WeakYes/Yes ? :)
That makes sense. I am in favor of this suggestion.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Posted: 4/25/2009 10:07 AM
Quote
moozooh
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
applepieman wrote:
Strange how the characters speak Japanese yet it still has English text being the Japanese version and all.
Except it's not the Japanese version, is it.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Posted: 4/24/2009 12:28 PM
Quote
moozooh
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
Way to dig graves, mr. Grue.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Posted: 4/24/2009 11:26 AM
Quote
moozooh
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
Aktanusa wrote:
When I did lossless for Double Dragon 2, the size I got (video only) was 12.7 MB. Maybe it's the settings I use? Again I can post the file if you would like.
Actually, your commandline would be more interesting to see.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Posted: 4/21/2009 5:19 PM
Quote
moozooh
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
Isn't it a corna? It's used to expel demons or something like that.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Posted: 4/21/2009 10:53 AM
Quote
moozooh
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
Warp wrote:
Idea: How about a compromise: Have both questions at the same time. And while at it, make both questions have the 5 suggested answers (ie. yes, weak yes, etc.)
This idea is probably the best compromise. I agree with it. But I still believe ratings should be normalized regardless.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Posted: 4/21/2009 10:30 AM
Quote
moozooh
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
Baxter wrote:
The poll is specifically there for judges, to get a fast impression of what people think about the movie.
Right, it's also pretty useless without the elaboration.
Baxter wrote:
Something like "I don't think this movie should be published, voting yes!" sounds a bit strange.
I'm decently sure I've read "I like this movie but I don't think it should be published here" a lot of times before.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Posted: 4/21/2009 7:02 AM
Quote
moozooh
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
While we're at it, I can tell my opinion on the questions. The reason "do you like it" was a good question is that the audience — those guys and gals that actually watch movies and stuff — can mainly like or dislike the site's content. The latter should be liked by the audience, otherwise the site is being useless. Therefore, the question was actually right. The site isn't about publishing, it's about likable content. "Do you think this should be published" is a kind of question for the judge to answer. However, in this particular case, what exactly do we need judges for if we have the audience play their role? Shouldn't we abolish the judgment system altogether as redundant, much to Enhasa's joy? I'm not saying this is necesarily a good idea, but I am asking for opinions on why should it stay if the question is asked this way.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Posted: 4/20/2009 9:38 AM
Quote
moozooh
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
Xkeeper wrote:
gaurentee
Flygon wrote:
GURANTEE
Garantee!
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Posted: 4/20/2009 7:42 AM
Quote
moozooh
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
Kuwaga wrote:
the 10s of the voters who give lower votes in average should count more than 10s of others
See adelikat's idea here.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Posted: 4/19/2009 6:57 PM
Quote
moozooh
Experienced Forum User, Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
Why did you register four accounts (djs, djstorchy, torchydjs, and this) instead of one? Are you being silly?
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
1 2
90 91 92
229 230