Posts for schneelocke


1 2 3 4
15 16
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 11/11/2004
Posts: 400
Location: ::1
nesfreak wrote:
You know, I started reading this topic and almost immediately thought of Google Videos. I think it's the perfect solution, especially for those who are tired of using bittorrent when there's no seeding.
Are there any current videos that aren't being seeded by anyone?
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 11/11/2004
Posts: 400
Location: ::1
Definitely "yes". :)
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 11/11/2004
Posts: 400
Location: ::1
flagitious wrote:
We could do google too. Does google have limits on size or length?
Apparently not:
"You can upload as many videos to Google Video as you like, without any size or length limitations. "
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 11/11/2004
Posts: 400
Location: ::1
In the words of Comic Book Guy: Worst. Suggestion. Ever.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 11/11/2004
Posts: 400
Location: ::1
Guybrush wrote:
I don't like that TASes are posted on Youtube. Even though more people see the runs, but most (I'd say about 95%) don't get the idea of TASing.
But they will be posted on YouTube, anyway. The question is just whether this is done in a controlled manner, with a link back to this site, a short explanation of how it's not a regular speedrun etc. and with banners etc. intact, or... well, without all that.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 11/11/2004
Posts: 400
Location: ::1
moozooh wrote:
He probably meant this site.
In that case... because they're not NES/FC/SNES/SFC/N64/Genesis/GB/SGB/GBC/GBA runs. :)
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 11/11/2004
Posts: 400
Location: ::1
mwl wrote:
Just wondering...why aren't entryway's runs featured on this site?
Because they're TAS runs.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 11/11/2004
Posts: 400
Location: ::1
captainobvious wrote:
I think that's a good idea. Maybe have an extra line of black at the top and/or bottom to add important notes. When I see a guy walk through a wall, I want to know what just happened ("Walk-through-wall glitch"). You could put in text into the black area so it doesn't cover the movie, but is close enough to explain confusing parts. (Use the top or the bottom depending on which is closer to the action. Or maybe just use one side, simpler)
Here's an idea: why not publish the subtitles separately, as SRT (I think that's the format, isn't it?) files? That way, everyone could decide for themselves whether to use them or not, something that otherwise would only be possible if there was more than one AVI file for each movie (eww). And it'd also mean that the subtitles could be changed/expanded separately from the main movie, without the need to reencode it in case someone finds a typo or so...
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 11/11/2004
Posts: 400
Location: ::1
Bisqwit wrote:
It was not sarcasm.
OK then. :)
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 11/11/2004
Posts: 400
Location: ::1
Bisqwit wrote:
Thank you for the feedback.
Was that sarcasm? I really can't tell. :) Seriously, though... I don't mind them too much, and I can see why they're being added, but they still are distracting. :P
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 11/11/2004
Posts: 400
Location: ::1
kwinse wrote:
Except that bosses are often defeated so fast that an hp counter would be pretty much useless. That and I still don't like watermarks/subtitles/whatever beyond what we have now, even if it means they are more open to abuse than other solutions...
I'll second that. I want to enjoy the videos, not constantly be distracted by subtitles, watermarks, and so on. The occasional "this video is tool-assisted" message that some videos have (not the one at the beginning, but the one in the middle of the video) is annoying enough already...
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 11/11/2004
Posts: 400
Location: ::1
Tub wrote:
bless you.
Thanks. :)
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 11/11/2004
Posts: 400
Location: ::1
moozooh wrote:
While the un-reversed one sounds like "hacker" (or better yet, "hack0r"), which probably is the reason to take it.
Mmm, good point, although I personally read it as "a-choo!". ^^
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 11/11/2004
Posts: 400
Location: ::1
Tub wrote:
Since Tub is often already registered or too short for a username, I have a second nick. I grabbed a klingon dictionary from a friend, just picked a random word and took that. I think it was written Ha'Qchor. Too bad I couldn't get rid of the trekkies, so I reversed it to be safe. rohcQaH. Means sugar or something.
Hmm, almost sounds like Rorschach. :)
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 11/11/2004
Posts: 400
Location: ::1
jimsfriend wrote:
They're invisible and pink? Interesting idea.
Thanks. :)
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 11/11/2004
Posts: 400
Location: ::1
Shadow Byrn wrote:
Do tehy use the reagular version of Doom or do they allow the various mouse-hacks to be used?
The regular version (on Compet-N, anyway; the DSDA doesn't have any requirements in that regard).
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 11/11/2004
Posts: 400
Location: ::1
hopper wrote:
When you say that it is generally accepted that there is nothing outside of the universe, do you mean the visible universe? I recently saw some kind of television show about the possibility that the universe is much larger than the visible universe, and the rest of the universe is so far away that its light hasn't reached us yet. We aren't able to observe anything for the universe to "eat", but that doesn't mean that there isn't a lot more stuff out there. Just be patient and some cosmic creature may drop the universe a bone in a few billion years.
Science only concerns itself with phenomena which can, at least in theory, be falsified, though. Postulating the existence of stuff that is utterly inaccessible (and thus cannot interact with us or our (observable) universe in any way) doesn't lead anywhere; of course it might be true, but it just as well might not, and we'll never be able to find out. In other words: I postulate that outside of the universe (for a suitable definition of "outside"), everything is actually run by a herd of invisible pink unicorns.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 11/11/2004
Posts: 400
Location: ::1
Guybrush wrote:
You haven't seen Ace Ventura 2 (was it 2?)? It's bat shit as far as I know.
It is.
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 11/11/2004
Posts: 400
Location: ::1
Highness wrote:
Thanks schneelocke!
You're welcome! :)
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 11/11/2004
Posts: 400
Location: ::1
Highness wrote:
The link located at that other therad say "File ID is not valid".
Works for me. In any case, I put up the file here, too, for everyone's convenience. :)
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 11/11/2004
Posts: 400
Location: ::1
xebra wrote:
Well, I mean, it is conceivable that all physical properties are quantized at fine enough resolutions.
Aren't all physical properties quantised at the Planck scale..?
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 11/11/2004
Posts: 400
Location: ::1
HiddenGamer wrote:
I was wondering if I could get a check list on all of THe TASe's so far so I can see how many I downloaded.
http://tasvideos.org/movies.cgi ?
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 11/11/2004
Posts: 400
Location: ::1
HiddenGamer wrote:
JXQ wrote:
If you want a different bitrate or higher quality, you need to re-encode the movies, not download the existing AVIs. If I misread this as your goal, I apologize.
YOU EXPECT ME TO DO THAT! woah, that is too much work. That's even more work then expected.
Whine whine whine... Seriously, I can't decide whether you're more annoying or amusing. :) But your constant expectation that people will do all the work for you and your getting upset when they don't grovel at your feet and thank you for being allowed to serve you is probably more funny in the end. If you want DVDs, roll up your sleeves and produce them yourself. Or ask people nicely, and don't get all pissy when they have better things to do than to fulfill your every wish; you may find that that actually works better, too. If I had had any intentions to maybe encode DVDs myself (which I didn't, mostly since I don't know how to do that), I certainly wouldn't be inclined to do it anymore now. And if something's too much work for you, why isn't it too much work for others, too?
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 11/11/2004
Posts: 400
Location: ::1
HiddenGamer wrote:
It is alright you can talk about the super mario 64 dvd tas iso or whatever. I don't think anyone is going to make all the tas videos on dvd.
It's up to you to change that, then. Go forth and mult-- I mean, create DVDs. :)
Experienced Forum User
Joined: 11/11/2004
Posts: 400
Location: ::1
Kyrsimys wrote:
The encoders already have a huge project in encoding all the accepted movies. I don't see why this kind of further fooling around is necessary.
If someone else wanted to do it, there'd be no reason why they couldn't, though.
1 2 3 4
15 16