You should'nt be able to control the rerecord count, it's basically lying how many rerecords you have. If you can lie about it then why not show it at all?
In the future, all TASes will be made using bots that brute-force for the best possible input combinations.
wimbledonswirl wrote:
How many more or less rerecords will be used?
Several billions of rerecords.
More like 10100000 rerecords for brute force. If it were just a few billion rerecords, we could conceivably do brute force TASes now. I am pessimistic about brute force TASes myself. I think TASes in the future will be done with much more script assistance than now, and perhaps be done completely by a computer, but I do not think they will be provably the optimal solution.
Post about your opion of what might happen in the future of TAS.
How many more or less rerecords will be used?
How much longer or shorter will the movie's take to make?
How much will the movie's change.
The movie is actully pretty boring, it's not the TAS it's just a bad game for TASi ng on. There are basicly NO glitches, pretty much all that is possible is to jump over and over but there is a great improvement from the last movie though so I think the movie desevers to be published.
This movie is almost as old as the site; which accounts for the less stringent requirements. Why'd you necro-bump it?
Maybe even a MEH to a YES as you said it is quite good for it's date :).
(Rated as a YES
Why are you rating it? The vote... and even the rating of this movie don't matter, as far as I know.
I'd suggest, if you are interested in rating a movie, watch and rate this. Remember, vote doesn't matter. http://tasvideos.org/971M.html
Now, That's the power of movie that uses over 3k rerecords!
This movie is almost as old as the site; which accounts for the less stringent requirements. Why'd you necro-bump it?[/quote]
Maybe even a MEH to a YES as you said it is quite good for it's date :).
(Rated as a YES)
78 rerecords!? In the guidelines it makes it quite clear that you need to put alot of effot into your TASes and if they used less than 1500 rerecords it shows that the player didn't try hard enough to publish their movie. I'm not sure the movie is actully that good. But I do have to admit that I am inpressed that the movie was managed to be done in 78 rerecords but shocked at the effort so I'd rate this movie as a MEH.
I really think Lord Tom DID deserve that 2009 reword, I like all his glichty and entertaining movie's aspecailly this one:
http://tasvideos.org/1252M.html
This movie isn't great, it's only a 714 frame inprovment and I think it could of been done in less than 100k rerecords and now mickey, sonicpacker and Bowster1 have beaten you with less than 40k rerecords at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gItuRytAQCU. But I think it's impressive anough to give a Yes.
My opion is that the movie is great. As well as it including entertaining glitches it saved a massave time of 39.27 which is a gaint improvment from 2:48.57 to 2:09.30. The desert was aswell good but did look like it had an improvable few frames.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I like Pointless Boy's idea about combining it with a glitchless run, that would make it even more entertaining.