Post subject: New Encoding Policy for YouTube (TASVideosChannel)
Editor, Emulator Coder, Site Developer
Joined: 5/11/2011
Posts: 1108
Location: Murka
When we first started using YouTube here, an ad-hoc system grew up where videos were posted on many different user channels. This makes it more difficult for viewers to find similar content after viewing a TAS, causes diffusion of search engine links, and creates possible risks with former encoders and no way for them to relinquish their control of the videos. The system has ballooned into something that's simply not manageable: http://tasvideos.org/Uploaders-Site-YouTube.html Our staff believes that a centralized YouTube channel is the best way to promote the internet visibility of TASVideos.org and create the best experience for our users. Accordingly, they've been hard at work implementing an official "TASVideosChannel" on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/TASVideosChannel. Because of their efforts, we now have a way for any user of the appropriate rank (encoder, publisher, etc.) to upload to this channel: http://tasvideos.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=13159. As an added bonus, these uploads can be linked to the publications in such a way that the descriptions on YouTube can be automatically changed if needed, so that links back to TASVideos are always correct and fresh. Now that all the tools are in place, we are ready to change policy regarding YouTube and publications: Beginning with submission 3673S, all new published movies must have an encode on the Official TASVideosChannel. The publisher must provide this encode (either directly or with the help of others). Other streaming links are allowed on publications, but only so far as they provide something different for the viewer. A streaming link on a different website (not YouTube) is good, as it can provide a possibly better viewing experience for users in different locations. A streaming link with an alternate view (input display/camhack encode) can be useful, depending on the movie in question. A second streaming link to the same content also on YouTube is not allowed: Pointless duplication confuses users and diffuses the SEO power of the links that are on the movie page. As an author, you retain control over your publication and may post it wherever you like in whatever form you like. As a user, you are always free to copy and repost TASVideos publications so long as the correct attribution is maintained. However, what we choose to link to on our publication pages is under our control. This policy is not meant to hurt or punish anyone. TASVideos is committed to increasing public knowledge about Tool Assisted methods, and to providing a publicity platform for your work! Unfortunately, TASVideos does not exist to provide hits to your YouTube channel specifically. Everyone's TASes will be more visible under this new arrangement. Questions/Comments?
Guga
He/Him
Joined: 1/17/2012
Posts: 838
Location: Chile
I agree with every word of this.
ALAKTORN
He/Him
Player (99)
Joined: 10/19/2009
Posts: 2527
Location: Italy
lol, I guess I won’t have any more publications on here it’d be ridiculous if this channel asks for partnership later on
Noxxa
They/Them
Moderator, Expert player (4137)
Joined: 8/14/2009
Posts: 4083
Location: The Netherlands
ALAKTORN wrote:
lol, I guess I won’t have any more publications on here
It's not like you've had any publications in the first place to begin with. :P
http://www.youtube.com/Noxxa <dwangoAC> This is a TAS (...). Not suitable for all audiences. May cause undesirable side-effects. May contain emulator abuse. Emulator may be abusive. This product contains glitches known to the state of California to cause egg defects. <Masterjun> I'm just a guy arranging bits in a sequence which could potentially amuse other people looking at these bits <adelikat> In Oregon Trail, I sacrificed my own family to save time. In Star trek, I killed helpless comrades in escape pods to save time. Here, I kill my allies to save time. I think I need help.
ALAKTORN
He/Him
Player (99)
Joined: 10/19/2009
Posts: 2527
Location: Italy
Mothrayas wrote:
ALAKTORN wrote:
lol, I guess I won’t have any more publications on here
It's not like you've had any publications in the first place to begin with. :P
SM64DS? but yeah, I get bored easily and TASing isn’t good with that
Noxxa
They/Them
Moderator, Expert player (4137)
Joined: 8/14/2009
Posts: 4083
Location: The Netherlands
ALAKTORN wrote:
SM64DS?
That's uploaded on mkdasher's account, not yours. But yeah, that one will eventually be assimilated by TASVideosChannel, either way. So yeah.
http://www.youtube.com/Noxxa <dwangoAC> This is a TAS (...). Not suitable for all audiences. May cause undesirable side-effects. May contain emulator abuse. Emulator may be abusive. This product contains glitches known to the state of California to cause egg defects. <Masterjun> I'm just a guy arranging bits in a sequence which could potentially amuse other people looking at these bits <adelikat> In Oregon Trail, I sacrificed my own family to save time. In Star trek, I killed helpless comrades in escape pods to save time. Here, I kill my allies to save time. I think I need help.
ALAKTORN
He/Him
Player (99)
Joined: 10/19/2009
Posts: 2527
Location: Italy
Mothrayas wrote:
that one will eventually be assimilated by TASVideosChannel, either way. So yeah.
what happens if we don’t give permission to it? will the site’s publication be removed?
Site Admin, Skilled player (1236)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11264
Location: RU
Being a partner doesn't automatically mark all others' matches as copyrighted.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Joined: 4/1/2010
Posts: 96
What effect does this have on temp encodes? For a while there I'd toss up a quick temp encode on occasion for people to vote on. Other than that ambiguity (which I think is trivial), I think this is a great move. I agree with it wholeheartedly.
Emulator Coder, Skilled player (1141)
Joined: 5/1/2010
Posts: 1217
Canar wrote:
What effect does this have on temp encodes? For a while there I'd toss up a quick temp encode on occasion for people to vote on.
None. This is only about Youtube encodes linked from publication page streaming links.
Emulator Coder
Joined: 3/9/2004
Posts: 4588
Location: In his lab studying psychology to find new ways to torture TASers and forumers
ALAKTORN wrote:
what happens if we don’t give permission to it? will the site’s publication be removed?
Once you put it on the site, you already did give permission to it.
Warning: Opinions expressed by Nach or others in this post do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Nach himself on the matter(s) being discussed therein.
Joined: 7/2/2007
Posts: 3960
ALAKTORN wrote:
Mothrayas wrote:
that one will eventually be assimilated by TASVideosChannel, either way. So yeah.
what happens if we don’t give permission to it? will the site’s publication be removed?
You do realize that this isn't going to be about removing existing encodes from YouTube, right? It's about making certain that all new official encodes linked from the tasvideos.org site go to the same channel, and (eventually) that all publications on tasvideos.org have a corresponding encode on the channel. As natt said in the original post, as the creator of a run, you can toss encodes up wherever you like. They just won't be an official part of the publication here unless they're on the TVC.
Pyrel - an open-source rewrite of the Angband roguelike game in Python.
ALAKTORN
He/Him
Player (99)
Joined: 10/19/2009
Posts: 2527
Location: Italy
Nach wrote:
ALAKTORN wrote:
what happens if we don’t give permission to it? will the site’s publication be removed?
Once you put it on the site, you already did give permission to it.
of course I gave permission to it, but I don’t anymore, I don’t have the right to retract permission about how to use my work? @Derakon: I understand perfectly, don’t worry
Emulator Coder
Joined: 3/9/2004
Posts: 4588
Location: In his lab studying psychology to find new ways to torture TASers and forumers
ALAKTORN wrote:
Nach wrote:
ALAKTORN wrote:
what happens if we don’t give permission to it? will the site’s publication be removed?
Once you put it on the site, you already did give permission to it.
of course I gave permission to it, but I don’t anymore, I don’t have the right to retract permission about how to use my work?
I take it you haven't actually read the Creative Commons license.
Warning: Opinions expressed by Nach or others in this post do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Nach himself on the matter(s) being discussed therein.
Active player (419)
Joined: 9/21/2009
Posts: 1047
Location: California
ignore this post, the problem i had is fixed. thank you ilari and nach.
Joined: 4/18/2010
Posts: 103
Agreed with SP. This is a dumb move.
Emulator Coder
Joined: 3/9/2004
Posts: 4588
Location: In his lab studying psychology to find new ways to torture TASers and forumers
sonicpacker wrote:
[09:27] <sonicpacker> this new "condition" of submitting was not part of the rules when i submitted any of the runs ive been involved with and nowhere did i agree that anyone aside from myself could upload MY content, whether it was submitted here or not.
Wiki: SystemWikiEditNote Page was created: 2004-08-23 16:12:56. License mentioned since: 2004-12-16 17:01:16.
Warning: Opinions expressed by Nach or others in this post do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Nach himself on the matter(s) being discussed therein.
Site Admin, Skilled player (1236)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11264
Location: RU
Seeing the holywar that rule has blown into on IRC, can we just allow the original author to host his run on his own YT channel if he wants and if it's properly encoded? For guys that earn money from views, that was voiced as a critical matter (like they would stop submitting), and for guys like me it's just pleasant to have your own TAS you care about on your channel (I don't mind having a copy on TVC not linked to from the pub).
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Active player (419)
Joined: 9/21/2009
Posts: 1047
Location: California
[10:22] <Ilari> sonicpacker: 1) I looked at the YT format list. All ones I could find seem to be HD, so presumably there is no technical reason to replace. 2) The submission numbers are <3673S anyway, so this new YT policy does not affect if those will be replaced or not. [10:22] <sonicpacker> ilari: then i honestly dont care about the rule. i simply didnt want my current video links replaced. if i can be promised that, then i have no issues
Emulator Coder
Joined: 3/9/2004
Posts: 4588
Location: In his lab studying psychology to find new ways to torture TASers and forumers
feos wrote:
Seeing the holywar that rule has blown into on IRC, can we just allow the original author to host his run on his own YT channel if he wants and if it's properly encoded?
That won't allow integration into the site. If the author wants to allow us (limited) access to his account to automatically update titles and descriptions, that's another matter. The movie description can always link to the author's channel to say "If you liked this movie, here's some more videos by so and so". As for existing videos, we don't replace them, unless there's some kind of need. But to be clear, under the site license that people submit under, we can always reupload encodes anywhere fitting.
Warning: Opinions expressed by Nach or others in this post do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Nach himself on the matter(s) being discussed therein.
ALAKTORN
He/Him
Player (99)
Joined: 10/19/2009
Posts: 2527
Location: Italy
Nach wrote:
If the author wants to allow us access to his account to automatically update titles and descriptions, that's another matter.
how would that work? who is “us”?
Emulator Coder
Joined: 3/9/2004
Posts: 4588
Location: In his lab studying psychology to find new ways to torture TASers and forumers
ALAKTORN wrote:
Nach wrote:
If the author wants to allow us access to his account to automatically update titles and descriptions, that's another matter.
how would that work? who is “us”?
Link to video As to what we do, we currently have movie edit pages tied into our YouTube channel to automatically have that channel mirror the movie text and link back to it. Of course authors are encouraged to help keep the movie page text good. Edit: We also have automatic uploading to channels. We could allow for all uploads to be automatically copied to any sites/channels uploads checked off when uploading.
Warning: Opinions expressed by Nach or others in this post do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Nach himself on the matter(s) being discussed therein.
Editor, Emulator Coder, Site Developer
Joined: 5/11/2011
Posts: 1108
Location: Murka
Canar wrote:
What effect does this have on temp encodes? For a while there I'd toss up a quick temp encode on occasion for people to vote on. Other than that ambiguity (which I think is trivial), I think this is a great move. I agree with it wholeheartedly.
No ambiguity:
As an author, you retain control over your publication and may post it wherever you like in whatever form you like.
You still own your work. This is just changing how we use the license to your work that you grant us. You can still post your wips, finished runs, and whatever else you want on your own page. We just aren't going to necessarily link to it.
Active player (419)
Joined: 9/21/2009
Posts: 1047
Location: California
NitroGenesis
He/Him
Editor, Experienced player (551)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
ALAKTORN wrote:
it’d be ridiculous if this channel asks for partnership later on
I agree, but I recall that if all you upload is video game footage, you aren't elligible for partnership. not sure if this is changed or i read it wrong, but whatever.
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.