Interesting. Is the specific DV combination used here the only such one that is useable for this or are there others? And does it have to be Charmander with those specific moves?
Spikestuff wrote:
Dyshonest, you are such a dense idiot.
Since this is going to be a rehash on Super Mario World I'm getting the popcorn.
Nice flaming. Can you please point out... anything about what you're talking about or is this more of your usual steroid-influenced posting?
Why is there no report function...?
Joined: 10/12/2011
Posts: 6337
Location: The land down under.
Oh that's cute. You're stating that I'm "flaming" you and the only evidence you have on that is by me stating the words "dense idiot" you know how stupid that sounds.
Also saying that I might have been influenced by something when I clearly state "this is going to be a rehash on Super Mario World".
You're trying to "attack" me but you're failing quite hard.
Anyways, I don't want to create a stupid war because someone cannot process information in their head.
Also I did a shorten url because why the hell not.
WebNations/Sabih wrote:
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
Disables Comments and Ratings for the YouTube account.Something better for yourself and also others.
Oh that's cute. You're stating that I'm "flaming" you and the only evidence you have on that is by me stating the words "dense idiot" you know how stupid that sounds.
Also saying that I might have been influenced by something when I clearly state "this is going to be a rehash on Super Mario World".
You're trying to attack me but you're failing quite hard.
Anyways, I don't want to create a stupid war because someone cannot process information in their head.
Can you tell me where I was trying to attack you or is this cocaine-inspired paranoia? No one is out to get you. Keep the tin-foil hat off.
http://tasvideos.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=385639#385639http://tasvideos.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=385641#385641
Please tell me where I am claiming something is something it's not. I did not claim it to be ACE (and even stated I don't think it would qualify as it) and inquired about the glitch while leaving my own opinion which also stated that it should likely obsolete both current runs.
Do you have anything to say or do you want to keep trying to turn this into a (one-sided) flame-war?
what's the point of URL shortening when you're going to use [url] tags anyway...?
EDIT: You edited your post to include a "for teh lulz" line, so here's another line from me:
"Flaming is a hostile and insulting interaction between Internet users, often involving the use of profanity."
Calling someone a "dense idiot" is unproductive, hostile and insulting, especially when the person in question has at this point only been asking questions and stating no form of opinion as fact or anything else. So I'm pretty sure it would qualify as flaming.
You rip on me for not fact-checking what I post but you allow yourself to post things without you even knowing what you're saying...?
