Submission Text Full Submission Page


TASVideoAgent
They/Them
Moderator
Joined: 8/3/2004
Posts: 15628
Location: 127.0.0.1
This topic is for the purpose of discussing #536: Neofix's NES Shadow of the Ninja (USA) in 12:50.63
Emulator Coder
Joined: 10/9/2004
Posts: 453
Location: Norway
I had a hard time deciding on a vote for this. The reason is simple, this game has very limited movement, and is in my opinion not the most entertaining game around. Atleast the way you played it. its mostly jumpslash and get as close you can to enemy and kill him all the way along, without any real risky or breathtaking maneouvers. On the other hand, I do not see any obvious mistakes or ways to make things faster, so I'm giving you a Yes to Meh vote. Yes being what I vote.
Former player
Joined: 3/13/2004
Posts: 1118
Location: Kansai, JAPAN
I stopeed watching it because I didn't enjoy the game, but it should be noted that a published movie of the European version has been published, and this movie is significantly faster.
Do Not Talk About Feitclub http://www.feitclub.com
Player (62)
Joined: 9/4/2004
Posts: 107
Location: Brazil
Jump + Atack = Increase velocity All the jumps i use atack to increase velocity. Sorry my poor english Look this movie: http://tasvideos.org/movies.cgi?id=33 Neofix - 12:51 - 46.238 frames - USA version (Shadow of thw Ninja) Exim - 11:36 - 41.760 frames - Euro version (Blue Shadow) But the Nes videos Agent SAY "Blue Shadow time 13:55 by Exim". What is more faster? Bisquit?
Emulator Coder
Joined: 10/9/2004
Posts: 453
Location: Norway
PAL = 50 frames pr second. NTSC = 60 frames pr second. 46238/60fps = 12:51 41760/50fps = 13:55
Arc
Editor, Experienced player (827)
Joined: 3/8/2004
Posts: 534
Location: Arizona
I voted 'Meh' because the game has 2-player simultaneous play potential, and because a few parts looked improvable.
Joined: 7/5/2004
Posts: 551
Location: Karlstad, Sweden
It's an improved time of Blue Shadow. And improved time = Yes to me.