Just shoot directly above you, nothing would go wrong. :smile:
Standard play executed quickly using 2 players to determine a single victor.
Not really much to write home about, shoot forwards, shoot upwards.
feos: Claiming for judging.
feos: We don't have a formal community agreement on how to judge games (or modes) where several players fight against each other. In the past we would argue that the losing player doing nothing (or even helping the other player to win) makes the movie trivial, and therefore it wouldn't make sense to count such a victory as sensible game completion.
But if triviality is not a problem anymore, we may ask ourselves if there's some other issue that makes such a completion nonsensical (subjectively). It's possible that the game
doesn't impose any tasks, but in Bowman you can't get away with no gameplay input, you have to do something at least with one of the players. Another potential issue is not reaching an ending that appears if you play against an AI, but we have
rule clauses for games (or modes) with endings. Can't think of anything else though.
Now I'd like to have a community discussion about such games (or modes), but both other admins are super busy with real-life, and I don't have enough ideas in my head to properly lead the discussion myself (yet). Maybe later.
Accepting this run though, because it doesn't present obvious problems regarding "VS player" games (or modes).
