1 2
Posted: 9/21/2008 5:16 PM
Post subject: Do you guys prefer 100% or any% runs?
Quote
TGArthur
Joined: 9/20/2008
Posts: 4
I personally love the 100% runs from any game. Especially the RPG games. The one I saw of Secret of Evermore, plus getting all the hidden items that you have to use your dog to sniff out was pretty impressive. I'd love to see more of them from different games as well.
Posted: 9/21/2008 5:20 PM
Quote
superjupi
Joined: 10/15/2007
Posts: 685
Depends on the game. Some 100% movies would be so long and tedious that the entertainment value would all but disappear, but the 100% runs I've actually watched so far have been quite enjoyable.
Kirby said so, so it must be true. ( >'.')>
Posted: 9/21/2008 5:40 PM
Quote
Sticky
Joined: 2/26/2007
Posts: 1365
Location: Minnesota
I enjoy them (of note, JXQ's Super Metroid with Input Animation), but sometimes they don't interest me at all. This is usually because I have never played the game and don't know/care what is going on.
adelikat wrote:
I very much agree with this post.
Bobmario511 wrote:
Forget party hats, Christmas tree hats all the way man.
Posted: 9/21/2008 6:21 PM
Quote
Joe
Joined: 6/10/2006
Posts: 152
Location: Wisconsin
I prefer any% runs to be done before 100% However, some games benefit from 100% runs in either showing extra portions of a game (such as extra levels), going tasks that are normally incredibly difficult, and preventing the use of warps. What first comes to mind here is the Donkey Kong Country games.
Posted: 9/21/2008 7:34 PM
Quote
alden
Player (121)
Joined: 2/11/2007
Posts: 1522
That's like asking if you like milk chocolate or dark chocolate better -- they can both be so good!
I make a comic with no image files and you should read it. While there is a lower class, I am in it, and while there is a criminal element I am of it, and while there is a soul in prison, I am not free. -Eugene Debs
Posted: 9/21/2008 7:35 PM
Quote
MUGG
Editor, Expert player (2373)
Joined: 5/15/2007
Posts: 3940
Location: Germany
Gameboy TASer of 2015 NES TAS of 2013 Gameboy TASer of 2011 Gameboy TASer of 2010
alden wrote:
That's like asking if you like milk chocolate or dark chocolate better -- they can both be so good!
That and it depends on the game. I can't watch 100% runs of games I never played.
Youtube • Livestream • Progress 11th TASer of the Decade 2010-2019 !
Posted: 9/21/2008 7:46 PM
Quote
Derakon
Joined: 7/2/2007
Posts: 3960
As others have noted, it really depends. Compare, for example, the Super Metroid and Metroid Fusion 100% runs. In the former, all of the extra resources (barring the superfluous missile tanks) get used. Damage boosting is a vital part of run strategy, the supermissiles and powerbombs both provide useful extra offense, and the various suit upgrades generally all get used in novel ways. However, in Metroid Fusion, damage boosting is nonexistent, rendering E-Tanks moot; the beam deals damage faster than missiles/bombs do, rendering ammo moot, and all of the suit upgrades are required to be collected to move the game along, which makes their use less novel. The upshot is that the 100% run is largely grabbing things that will never be used, just because you can. For games where the 100% involves doing things that aren't immediately useful (e.g. getting Chaos Emeralds in Sonic games), it depends on how interesting the detours are and how good the payoff is. So in S3&K, the bonus stages aren't especially interesting, but once all the emeralds are collected, the game speeds up drastically, and you get to see a bonus boss -- that's pretty good. The Sonic 1 bonus stages are more interesting, but they require slowing down the main levels to get rings and the payoff is just a slightly different ending -- not so great.
Pyrel - an open-source rewrite of the Angband roguelike game in Python.
Posted: 9/21/2008 9:22 PM
Quote
IST
Joined: 8/26/2008
Posts: 103
superjupi wrote:
Depends on the game. Some 100% movies would be so long and tedious that the entertainment value would all but disappear, but the 100% runs I've actually watched so far have been quite enjoyable.
Agreed. A 100% run of FF10, for example, would only work as a TAS, and even then it'd be at least 60 hours, most of it grinding...
Posted: 9/22/2008 1:36 AM
Quote
andrewg
Experienced player (702)
Joined: 2/19/2006
Posts: 742
Location: Quincy, MA
NES TAS of 2011
low% runs
Super Mario Bros. console speedrunner - Andrew Gardikis
Posted: 9/22/2008 2:15 AM
Quote
MezzoDragon
He/Him
Joined: 5/27/2007
Posts: 120
100% runs are always fun to watch. However, seeing an any% run is also nice.
Posted: 9/25/2008 2:07 AM
Quote
Kitsune
Joined: 4/29/2005
Posts: 1212
I personally enjoy 100% runs over Low%-Any%. I am awaiting the Paper Mario 100% run at SDA with great anticipation after that new low% run that Batman9502 did.
Posted: 9/25/2008 3:18 AM
Quote
Xkeeper
Banned User
Joined: 12/23/2004
Posts: 1850
I greatly prefer 100% runs. :P
Perma-banned
Posted: 9/25/2008 3:30 AM
Quote
p0rtal_0f_rain
Banned User
Joined: 12/5/2007
Posts: 742
Location: Gone
It is certain to ensure you understand every single bit of the game. All the tips, tricks, and trades - that's what puts most games at 100% - and that's what I would admire. It lets me study the game more so I'll know where to find stuff. That, and the main character in the game will feel like God when the speed run is over.
Posted: 9/25/2008 4:38 AM
Quote
ElectroSpecter
Player (246)
Joined: 8/6/2006
Posts: 784
Location: Connecticut, USA
I tend to like low% and 100% over any% since they tend to deviate from normal gameplay. 100% shows off parts of the game you wouldn't see in an any% TAS, and low% (typically) involves breaking the game and/or laughing in it's face as you skip things that were intended to be mandatory.
My Backloggery
Posted: 9/25/2008 8:22 AM
Quote
pirate_sephiroth
Active player (315)
Joined: 2/28/2006
Posts: 2275
Location: Milky Way -> Earth -> Brazil
New systems TAS of 2009
100% runs are good, but only for the games I know really well. And also nobody noticed this is at the wrong place! (I believe in 100% run in other systems too)
"Genuine self-esteem, however, consists not of causeless feelings, but of certain knowledge about yourself. It rests on the conviction that you — by your choices, effort and actions — have made yourself into the kind of person able to deal with reality. It is the conviction — based on the evidence of your own volitional functioning — that you are fundamentally able to succeed in life and, therefore, are deserving of that success." - Onkar Ghate
Bisqwit wrote:
Drama, too long, didn't read, lol.
Posted: 9/25/2008 8:49 AM
Quote
Kyrsimys
Former player
Joined: 4/16/2004
Posts: 1286
Location: Finland
Kitsune wrote:
[...]that new low% run that Batman9502 did.
It's a great run, but it's an any% and not a low%.
Posted: 9/25/2008 12:37 PM
Quote
Acheron86
Joined: 8/23/2008
Posts: 417
I think I'm noticing a trend here. Can't really add to what superjupi said much. if I set out to watch a 100% run I'm at least somewhat familiar with the game, otherwise I watch the any% first if it exists. Whether or not I'll enjoy the 100% more just depends on how much more entertainment can be gotten out of the extra time added. If it takes a huge chunk of time to do a 100% the tricks will have to be pretty amazing to keep me interested.
I will not use self-reference in my signature.
Posted: 9/25/2008 3:31 PM
Quote
Twelvepack
Joined: 5/2/2006
Posts: 1020
Location: Boulder, CO
andrewg wrote:
low% runs
QFT.
Has never colored a dinosaur.
Posted: 9/25/2008 8:36 PM
Post subject: move request
Quote
Xkeeper
Banned User
Joined: 12/23/2004
Posts: 1850
Also, I'd like to recommend this thread be moved into General or something. It seems kind of odd to have it here if it doesn't have anything to do with the NES specifically.
Perma-banned
Posted: 9/28/2008 2:56 AM
Quote
jpmccord
Joined: 6/13/2008
Posts: 5
Location: Georgia, USA
Usually, I want both, because for many games it doesn't make sense to have one without the other. Consider a game like Super Mario Bros or Donkey Kong Country... When I first got it, I just wanted to play it through. If I accidentally found a shortcut, I made sure to avoid it on my second time through the game just to see what I missed. But then I looked for those things on future re-plays. So of course for these games, I want both. (And in Mario's case, I want every variety of a run I can get my hands on.) Of course, I have no interest in extraordinarily long 100% runs when much of the extra time is spent on tedious tasks like repetitive battles or item collecting. I'm thinking RPG's mostly, here. Grand Theft Auto might be an exception though...
Posted: 9/28/2008 9:45 PM
Quote
Rick
Former player
Joined: 6/25/2004
Posts: 607
Location: Maine
I lean towards 100% runs, to be honest, because I like seeing parts of a game TASed that wouldn't normally be seen in an any% run otherwise. It's kind of neat too to see like, a really hard-to-get bonus room get accessed as if the game were set in Easy Mode.
http://wiki.rustedlogic.net/The_Cutting_Room_Floor The Cutting Room Floor wiki.
Posted: 10/2/2008 10:37 PM
Quote
Captain_Forehead
Player (80)
Joined: 7/7/2008
Posts: 873
Location: Utah
Question: Would there be a 100% Final Fantasy game or not? I Don't know if it could be entertaining though, I'm just wondering.
Posted: 10/3/2008 12:24 AM
Quote
Twelvepack
Joined: 5/2/2006
Posts: 1020
Location: Boulder, CO
Almost for sure, a 100% final fantasy run would get rejected. FF1 would be the same as the published run (except for some tedious item collection), and all of the sequels that have runs published are really, really long as it is. Remember, even lord of the rings wasn't entertaining for 3 hours (seriously), so its hard to expect that from a TAS.
Has never colored a dinosaur.
Posted: 10/3/2008 4:04 AM
Quote
Captain_Forehead
Player (80)
Joined: 7/7/2008
Posts: 873
Location: Utah
Just so you know know, Lord of the Rings is entertaining, in fact, it's my favorite movie of all time.
Posted: 10/3/2008 9:54 AM
Quote
Warp
Banned User
Joined: 3/10/2004
Posts: 7698
Location: Finland
I don't know which "Lord of the Rings" movie you are talking about, as you seem to talk about it as if it was a single 3-hour movie, but at least I have watched the entire extended trilogy as a marathon a couple of times. Yes, that's right, about 11 hours straight, from beginning to end. And I still enjoy it.
1 2