Former player
Joined: 3/30/2004
Posts: 1354
Location: Heather's imagination
This is a very strange shooter that's a twist on the old cellphone game Snake. Basically you're a snake with a gun who lives on a super-low-friction cube, and stuff falls from the sky onto your cube, which you shoot until it falls off. If shots hit you or anything else, it gets pushed towards the edge, and your own directional buttons just kind of push you in that direction too. By pushing enemy snakes off the cube you get longer - which makes you easier to hit and harder to control - but your length is also a score multiplier, and you can detach your body with a button if times get tough. It's super addictive and really weird. http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~cs8k-cyu/windows/mcd_e.html
someone is out there who will like you. take off your mask so they can find you faster. I support the new Nekketsu Kouha Kunio-kun.
Joined: 2/12/2006
Posts: 432
source? it says its free software, but i dont see a source.
Banned User
Joined: 3/10/2004
Posts: 7698
Location: Finland
Bob A wrote:
source? it says its free software, but i dont see a source.
Free: provided without, or not subject to, a charge or payment: free parking; a free sample.
Joined: 2/12/2006
Posts: 432
saying that its "free software" strongly implies that its free software, not just gratis software.
Joined: 1/31/2005
Posts: 95
Most people have never even heard of the distinction.
Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5777
Location: Away
Bob A wrote:
saying that its "free software" strongly implies that its free software, not just gratis software.
Doesn't mean the author is willing to share the source.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Player (105)
Joined: 1/30/2005
Posts: 564
Location: Québec, Canada
Bob A wrote:
saying that its "free software" strongly implies that its free software, not just gratis software.
"Free software" doesn't always mean "Free software distributed under the GNU General Public License".
Former player
Joined: 10/1/2006
Posts: 1102
Location: boot_camp
Bob A wrote:
saying that its "free software" strongly implies that its free software, not just gratis software.
Would you rather pay to get only the source?
Borg Collective wrote:
Negotiation is irrelevant. Self-determination is irrelevant. You will be assimilated.
Banned User
Joined: 3/10/2004
Posts: 7698
Location: Finland
Bob A wrote:
saying that its "free software" strongly implies that its free software
Yes, that's correct. Saying that it's free obviously implies that it's free. That is, you don't have to pay to use it. (Just because some FSF or such organization wants to redefine the word "free" to mean something completely different doesn't mean they are right. Free means free: You don't have to pay. Period.)
Player (68)
Joined: 3/11/2004
Posts: 1058
Location: Reykjaví­k, Ísland
Warp wrote:
Bob A wrote:
saying that its "free software" strongly implies that its free software
Yes, that's correct. Saying that it's free obviously implies that it's free. That is, you don't have to pay to use it. (Just because some FSF or such organization wants to redefine the word "free" to mean something completely different doesn't mean they are right. Free means free: You don't have to pay. Period.)
What? "Free" can without any redefinition, mean many different things. For example, it can mean free from confinement, relieve from, dislodge. Etc. For more meanings, see this page: http://www.google.is/search?q=define%3Afree No one is "redefining" anything. It's just too bad that there aren't two different English words for free (cost nothing) and free (not constrained).
Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5777
Location: Away
Blublu wrote:
No one is "redefining" anything. It's just too bad that there aren't two different English words for free (cost nothing) and free (not constrained).
The point was that free != open-source.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Banned User
Joined: 12/23/2004
Posts: 1850
Bob A wrote:
source? it says its free software, but i dont see a source.
Is there a reason you care? It's a game, you don't need the source for it. Christ...
Perma-banned
Editor, Player (69)
Joined: 6/22/2005
Posts: 1050
Blublu wrote:
No one is "redefining" anything. It's just too bad that there aren't two different English words for free (cost nothing) and free (not constrained).
Well, there's costless and unconstrained, but they just don't sound as cool as free, do they?
Current Projects: TAS: Wizards & Warriors III.
Former player
Joined: 12/22/2006
Posts: 193
Location: Flowood, MS
the term "free software" has come to mean "free-as-in-speech" to many, so it can be confusing when a freeware application refers to itself as free software.
<adelikat> tony hawk is porn for me <Comicalflop>my mom is hot
Player (36)
Joined: 9/11/2004
Posts: 2630
Xkeeper wrote:
Bob A wrote:
source? it says its free software, but i dont see a source.
Is there a reason you care? It's a game, you don't need the source for it. Christ...
I'd like a Linux binary. I don't like playing games in a VMWare session.
Build a man a fire, warm him for a day, Set a man on fire, warm him for the rest of his life.
Joined: 7/26/2006
Posts: 1215
this is like geometry wars + snake, really. pretty cool.