Forum

Gruefood

#2368: Nomade's SNES Ultimate Mortal Kombat 3 in 10:08.33

Vote: Should this movie be published? (Vote after watching!)

Submission Text Full Submission Page

This video shows that it is possible to finish the opponent with it even dropped. And shows some variations of bugs, even with the fallen opponent.

Player: Nomade. Game: Ultimate Mortal Kombat 3. Bugs: There is bugs. Version of the rom: Usa. Version of the emulator: Snes9x v1.43+v15.3(lua 0.05) for Windows.

Confuration used:

Display settings: Output Method: DirectDraw

       General:                     SNES Image

Maintain Aspect Ratio (on) Transparency (on) Use Video Memory (on) Hi Res (on)

                                Bi-Lenear Height (on)

Out put Image Processing: none

Hi Res: none

Show Frame Rate (on) Full screen Display Settings Automatic Max skipped frame: 1 Current 640x480 16bit 60Hz

  Sound Settings:

Play back: 32Hz(snes) Buffer length: 40ms Channels: All channels 16 bit-sound (on) Stereo (on) Interpolated: (on) Sync sound (on)

mmbossman: Not quite what we're looking for. Rejecting.

Showing items [1 - 13] of 13

Posted: 8/7/2009 1:41 PM

Quote

TASVideoAgent

They/Them

Moderator

Joined: 8/3/2004
Posts: 15537
Location: 127.0.0.1

This topic is for the purpose of discussing #2368: Nomade's SNES Ultimate Mortal Kombat 3 in 10:08.33

Posted: 8/7/2009 7:37 PM

Quote

mmbossman

Experienced player (828)

Joined: 11/18/2006
Posts: 2426
Location: Back where I belong

Generally you should provide more details regarding the actual run, as opposed to every emulator setting. For example, how is this movie different from this one?: http://tasvideos.org/2308S.html

Living Well Is The Best Revenge My Personal Page

Posted: 8/7/2009 8:12 PM

Quote

Creatus

Joined: 3/18/2006
Posts: 81
Location: Finland

It seems that only point of this run was to demonstrate fatalities after finishing timer has run out of time. That could have been demonstrated as a single trick, but when this run repeats that only trick again and again, it gets boring. Also too much same combos were used IMO. And please, that amount of Nightwolf isn't necessary. So I vote No. It needs more variation to tricks, combos and bugs.

Posted: 8/8/2009 4:49 PM

Quote

p0rtal_0f_rain

Banned User

Joined: 12/5/2007
Posts: 742
Location: Gone

Voting NO, I stick with SDR's publication.

Posted: 8/8/2009 6:04 PM

Quote

Dooty

Expert player (2466)

Joined: 6/2/2009
Posts: 1182
Location: Teresópolis - Rio de Janeiro - Brazil

The trick is good, but you over used it, I agree with p0rtal_0f_rain, the SDR's is much more fun, also voting No.

I am old enough to know better, but not enough to do it.

Posted: 8/9/2009 12:29 AM

Quote

Glitcher

He/Him

Joined: 3/24/2007
Posts: 216
Location: London, U.K.

Meh, not as impressive as SDR's submission. The glitch fatalities don't really add much because most of them just involve the opponent falling over. There aren't really any messed up graphics. Voting NO.

Posted: 8/9/2009 7:09 AM

Quote

TASVideosGrue

They/Them

Joined: 10/1/2008
Posts: 2783
Location: The dark corners of the TASVideos server

om, nom, nom... minty!

Posted: 8/9/2009 12:41 PM

Quote

p0rtal_0f_rain

Banned User

Joined: 12/5/2007
Posts: 742
Location: Gone

I knew this would be rejected since the beginning. Good call, mmbossman! ^_^

Posted: 8/9/2009 12:43 PM

Quote

Sticky

Joined: 2/26/2007
Posts: 1365
Location: Minnesota

Was that comment truly necessary? Perhaps the author may feel a bit shitty, having his run rejected. Did that icing need to be on his shit-cake? I go with no.

adelikat wrote: