1 2
5 6
Banned User, Former player
Joined: 3/10/2004
Posts: 7698
Location: Finland
Nach wrote:
Perhaps we should wait 6 months before publishing? Yes.
If the original point was "it's a great thing that submissions don't stay in the queue for months, but we shouldn't go to the other extreme either", why are you suggesting the original extreme as the "alternative"? Nobody has suggested that the submissions should be delayed for months, so why are you writing as if that was the implication? What is it with extremes? When someone suggests not going to an extreme, the standard counter-argument seems to be to ask if what you want is to go to the opposite extreme. That doesn't make sense (especially when getting rid of that opposite extreme was a point raised to begin with). I honestly can't understand why you are acting like judges waiting a few days for people to comment on a submission would be such an unreasonable suggestion. What exactly is the problem here?
Emulator Coder
Joined: 3/9/2004
Posts: 4588
Location: In his lab studying psychology to find new ways to torture TASers and forumers
Warp wrote:
Nach wrote:
Perhaps we should wait 6 months before publishing? Yes.
If the original point was "it's a great thing that submissions don't stay in the queue for months, but we shouldn't go to the other extreme either", why are you suggesting the original extreme as the "alternative"? Nobody has suggested that the submissions should be delayed for months, so why are you writing as if that was the implication?
Did you completely not notice it was in response to what moozooh said? Take things in context.
Warp wrote:
I honestly can't understand why you are acting like judges waiting a few days for people to comment on a submission would be such an unreasonable suggestion. What exactly is the problem here?
I don't have a problem with that. What I have a problem with is when a judge didn't wait a few days, people complain. Judging, encoding, and publishing is a lot of effort. How would you feel if someone insulted your hard work because you did it promptly?
Warning: Opinions expressed by Nach or others in this post do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or position of Nach himself on the matter(s) being discussed therein.
Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5770
Location: Away
Although I've given up on this discussion, "timely" != "promptly".
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Experienced player (822)
Joined: 11/18/2006
Posts: 2426
Location: Back where I belong
Anyone else find it funny that this two page argument about not judging movies too soon is occuring in a thread originally started to promote judging of movies that had stayed in queue for a year?
Living Well Is The Best Revenge My Personal Page
Joined: 11/4/2007
Posts: 1772
Location: Australia, Victoria
mmbossman wrote:
Anyone else find it funny that this two page argument about not judging movies too soon is occuring in a thread originally started to promote judging of movies that had stayed in queue for a year?
What can we say, TASVideos is like politics. You are either Liberal or Conservative, Liberal publishing after two days, Conservative taking one or two months.
Joined: 7/2/2007
Posts: 3960
We're also a bunch of pedantic geeks, which means we can never rest as long as there's someone wrong on the Internet!
Pyrel - an open-source rewrite of the Angband roguelike game in Python.
adelikat
He/Him
Emulator Coder, Site Developer, Site Owner, Expert player (3600)
Joined: 11/3/2004
Posts: 4739
Location: Tennessee
Derakon wrote:
We're also a bunch of pedantic geeks, which means we can never rest as long as there's someone wrong on the Internet!
and in our case that is combined with the need for perfection. Very dangerous.
It's hard to look this good. My TAS projects
1 2
5 6