i have been looking these youtube movies, and im sure, if someone put togeteher all of then in a 120 star movie that would beat the current publication easily
Joined: 8/14/2009
Posts: 4089
Location: The Netherlands
Universe-X wrote:
There's also the luck manipulation that goes into it people.
I don't think there's much, if any, luck manipulation in SM64, so that wouldn't be a big issue.
http://www.youtube.com/Noxxa
<dwangoAC> This is a TAS (...). Not suitable for all audiences. May cause undesirable side-effects. May contain emulator abuse. Emulator may be abusive. This product contains glitches known to the state of California to cause egg defects.
<Masterjun> I'm just a guy arranging bits in a sequence which could potentially amuse other people looking at these bits
<adelikat> In Oregon Trail, I sacrificed my own family to save time. In Star trek, I killed helpless comrades in escape pods to save time. Here, I kill my allies to save time. I think I need help.
You guys don't know what your talking about.
Here's a few thing to know:
To kinda "max" a star we'd need about 4-10k rerecords per star. Considering this game has 120 star + plenty of inner castle parts we'd use about 750k rerecords to have what you guys could call a "maxed" 120 star TAS.
Again, this is only a supposition. This would take forever.
And, yes, there's a lot of luck manipulation in SM64. Bob-ombs, goombas, elevators, spindrifts, rolling rocks, etc, etc. We can't hex all the stars just like that. I repeat, we CAN'T hex all the stars just like that. The best thing would be to start a new .m64 and pursue it up to 120 star, by hexing what can be hexed.
Also, guys like SilentSlayers, Moltov, Kyman, sonicpacker, BrianStormer, Mickey11189 and Mr_Roberts_Z will help toward this project, when the 0 star run will be finished.
Considering this will be the most epic TASvideos run ever on this site, this might take some time. Don't expect this to be done this summer, you know.
If you need any other informations, I'll try to answer them.
Joined: 11/29/2005
Posts: 317
Location: Sao Paulo - Brazil
Nahoc wrote:
You guys don't know what your talking about.
Here's a few thing to know:
To kinda "max" a star we'd need about 4-10k rerecords per star. Considering this game has 120 star + plenty of inner castle parts we'd use about 750k rerecords to have what you guys could call a "maxed" 120 star TAS.
Again, this is only a supposition. This would take forever.
And, yes, there's a lot of luck manipulation in SM64. Bob-ombs, goombas, elevators, spindrifts, rolling rocks, etc, etc. We can't hex all the stars just like that. I repeat, we CAN'T hex all the stars just like that. The best thing would be to start a new .m64 and pursue it up to 120 star, by hexing what can be hexed.
Also, guys like SilentSlayers, Moltov, Kyman, sonicpacker, BrianStormer, Mickey11189 and Mr_Roberts_Z will help toward this project, when the 0 star run will be finished.
Considering this will be the most epic TASvideos run ever on this site, this might take some time. Don't expect this to be done this summer, you know.
If you need any other informations, I'll try to answer them.
What is so special about this run?
I thought 0-star runs wouldn't take that much to make.
I think they mean interating and scrutinising to the point where they can't improve it any further. This doesn't mean to suggest that any single star is "frame perfect", but as close to perfection as they can get based on the current knowledge that they have. A sort of no stone unturned approach.
