Submission Text Full Submission Page
A while ago, I was watching through the gruefood delight section of TASVideos, and when I came across the Color a Dinosaur videos, I was absolutely disgusted at how inartistic they were. Though they were full of color, they were not full of soul. That's where I came in, to truly show them how it's done.

Game objectives

  • Emulator used: FCEUX 2.1.5
  • Finishes the first level of the game as artistically as possible
  • Maximum Kills
  • Best Ending
  • 5 Players
  • Swallows no chucks

Comments

Now, if you're reading this after watching my submission, you may be wondering why I chose what I did. Well, you see, I wanted to represent something in my TAS. The lack of color symbolizes how it blends in to the background, meaning no-one will ever pay attention to him. However, it does show the mental strength of this dinosaur, because he knows he needn't change a thing about himself in order to be perfect. Notice how even without colors, he is happy, for he is truly blessed with divine grace. I also wanted viewers to see an even deeper meaning, if they focus and think hard enough about it. I won't spoil what that is, but I'm sure after watching it several times it will be clear to you.

Stage by stage comments

Title Screen

I seriously used up a whole half of my re-records here, just to find the perfect frame to start the game.

Dinosaur

After making my goal clear to myself, I had to figure out the most optimal way to color nothing at all. I eventually settled for this.

Other comments

If you 'truly' understand fine art, this will make you weep tears of blood. If you don't, you will not enjoy this. I suggest doing at least a bachelor's in art and at least a diploma in art history. Potentially, I could make it have more soul by making the dinosaur frown at the start, because he doesn't want to change, and then have him smile when I finish because I realize his perfection, but the RNG is far too crazy for me to understand.
Special thanks to PJ and Adelikat for helping me find the frame data for this game, but thank myself for the artistic drive.

Nach: This game lacks entertainment and is too creative for the vault, rejecting.


TASVideoAgent
They/Them
Moderator
Joined: 8/3/2004
Posts: 15585
Location: 127.0.0.1
Joined: 6/23/2009
Posts: 150
Yes for coloring a dinosaur!
Skilled player (1741)
Joined: 9/17/2009
Posts: 4981
Location: ̶C̶a̶n̶a̶d̶a̶ "Kanatah"
Patashu
He/Him
Joined: 10/2/2005
Posts: 4043
ObadiahtheSlim wrote:
Yes for coloring a dinosaur!
This statement is incorrect as white and black aren't colours. lololol i troll u
My Chiptune music, made in Famitracker: http://soundcloud.com/patashu My twitch. I stream mostly shmups & rhythm games http://twitch.tv/patashu My youtube, again shmups and rhythm games and misc stuff: http://youtube.com/user/patashu
Spikestuff
They/Them
Editor, Publisher, Expert player (2643)
Joined: 10/12/2011
Posts: 6440
Location: The land down under.
Patashu wrote:
ObadiahtheSlim wrote:
Yes for coloring a dinosaur!
This statement is incorrect as white and black aren't colours. lololol i troll u
^ That TROLOLOLOOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
WebNations/Sabih wrote:
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
Disables Comments and Ratings for the YouTube account. Something better for yourself and also others.
Invariel
He/Him
Editor, Site Developer, Player (171)
Joined: 8/11/2011
Posts: 539
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Ah, it must be that most magical of special days again.
I am still the wizard that did it. "On my business card, I am a corporate president. In my mind, I am a game developer. But in my heart, I am a gamer." -- Satoru Iwata <scrimpy> at least I now know where every map, energy and save room in this game is
Skilled player (1741)
Joined: 9/17/2009
Posts: 4981
Location: ̶C̶a̶n̶a̶d̶a̶ "Kanatah"
Invariel wrote:
Ah, it must be that most magical of special days again.
February 33 2001?
Joined: 7/7/2012
Posts: 16
It belongs in a museum!
Joined: 2/20/2010
Posts: 209
Location: I'm in space
wonderful... just wonderful... totodiletrainer01, I want you to know that I truly "get" it. If I were a monk, I'd wrap myself in a print of your perfect dinosaur, and then set myself on fire.
Oh, play it cool. Play it cool. Here come the space cops.
Banned User
Joined: 3/10/2004
Posts: 7698
Location: Finland
Patashu wrote:
ObadiahtheSlim wrote:
Yes for coloring a dinosaur!
This statement is incorrect as white and black aren't colours.
Depends on your definition of "color". Technically speaking white is a color.
Patashu
He/Him
Joined: 10/2/2005
Posts: 4043
Warp wrote:
Patashu wrote:
ObadiahtheSlim wrote:
Yes for coloring a dinosaur!
This statement is incorrect as white and black aren't colours.
Depends on your definition of "color". Technically speaking white is a color.
1) Black and white lack hue and saturation, which are defining aspects of a colour. 2) We refer to colour-blindness as the inability to see colours. But colour-blind people can perceive black and white fine, therefore they cannot be colours. 3) No one, artist or layman, has ever referred to a monochrome picture or painting as 'colourful'. trolololol
My Chiptune music, made in Famitracker: http://soundcloud.com/patashu My twitch. I stream mostly shmups & rhythm games http://twitch.tv/patashu My youtube, again shmups and rhythm games and misc stuff: http://youtube.com/user/patashu
Banned User
Joined: 3/10/2004
Posts: 7698
Location: Finland
Patashu wrote:
1) Black and white lack hue and saturation, which are defining aspects of a colour. 2) We refer to colour-blindness as the inability to see colours. But colour-blind people can perceive black and white fine, therefore they cannot be colours. 3) No one, artist or layman, has ever referred to a monochrome picture or painting as 'colourful'
Well, I said technically speaking. Light with a frequency inside the visible spectrum is perceived by the human eye depending on its frequency spectrum distribution. In fact, several different frequency spectrum distributions might look identical to the human eye (so-called metamerism.) For example light that's a sharp spike at the frequency of yellow will look yellow to the human eye, but also light that has two spikes, one at red and another at green (and with proper amplitudes) will look exactly the same color to the human eye (even though the properties of those two spectra are completely different.) The reason for this is that our eyes do not perceive all frequencies within the visible light spectrum equally because we only have three types of light receptors. These receptors perceive slightly overlapping ranges of light approximately around the red, green and blue frequencies. There are colors perceived by the human eye that have no single frequency. For example there is no frequency that corresponds to magenta. Magenta is a "fake" color, an interpretation of our brain that's triggered when the light has red and blue frequencies. What happens when all three types of receptors are activated in an equal manner? Again, we get another "fake" color perception like magenta. In this case it's perceived as white. Technically speaking there's little difference between the two; in both cases more than one receptor is activated, and our brain interprets the result in a certain manner. In fact, the vast majority of colors in practice activate all three types of receptors in some manner. (Real-life surfaces and lights extremely seldom have pure single frequencies, or completely lack frequencies at the lower or higher ranges of the visible spectrum.) It's just that they activate some receptors more than others, which is why not all colors look white. In case of white, they are all activated almost in an equal amount. Technically there's little difference between white and other colors. It's just our subjective interpretation of white being somehow different from the others. (Black is truly a different matter. Pure black is the complete lack of any light, which truly can be considered a non-color.)
adelikat
He/Him
Emulator Coder, Site Developer, Site Owner, Expert player (3573)
Joined: 11/3/2004
Posts: 4754
Location: Tennessee
Wow, truly inspiring! And I now see the error of my ways. I will go back and change TASes to "Dinosaurs who lack the awareness of their divine grace"
It's hard to look this good. My TAS projects
Active player (406)
Joined: 3/22/2006
Posts: 708
Man, I missed Color A Dinosaur.
Active player (406)
Joined: 3/22/2006
Posts: 708
...you didn't colour the dinosaur! Huge no vote. Highly disappointing run.
Joined: 4/3/2005
Posts: 575
Location: Spain
An albino stegosaurus!!
No.
Hopper262
He/They
Joined: 3/22/2011
Posts: 55
Does this mean CCC is the most poetic of SM64 runs? After all, it proves Mario doesn't need fancy caps or lots of coins to find true happiness. Voting yes for both time and style improvements over previous CaD runs. The way you matched this dinosaur's color scheme with the opening graphics was a big aesthetic improvement. Hope to see the 100% soon!
Editor, Experienced player (570)
Joined: 11/8/2010
Posts: 4036
This is art. Yes vote.
RachelB
She/Her
Player (129)
Joined: 12/3/2011
Posts: 1579
As great as your dinosaur is, you have failed to color a dinosaur. I'm sorry, but i can't vote yes for a movie that doesn't color a dinosaur.
Post subject: Color a Dinosaur: YouTube HD
Joined: 3/18/2006
Posts: 971
Location: Great Britain
Joined: 2/3/2013
Posts: 320
Location: Germany
I'm enlightened! Yes vote!
All syllogisms have three parts, therefore this is not a syllogism.
Banned User
Joined: 3/10/2004
Posts: 7698
Location: Finland
Btw, there's an interesting peculiarity about certain colors we perceive. On the lower end of the visible light spectrum, ie. the red end, as we go lower and lower, the light triggers our red receptors less and less. (The light receptors in our eyes are able to perceive a range of light frequencies with a sensitivity that follows an approximate bell curve, so that they perceive light of a certain frequency the best, but as we move higher or lower in the spectrum, they perceive it less and less until it perceives it no more.) In other words, as the frequency of light gets lower and lower, we just see it as a dimmer and dimmer red, until we don't see it anymore. However, on the upper end of the range something peculiar happens. One would think that as we get upper and upper, it would just activate our blue receptors less and less, which means that we see the light as blue, getting dimmer and dimmer until we see it no more. However, that's not what happens. Instead, when the frequency goes above blue, we start seeing violet. Now that's strange indeed. We have no receptors for violet light, only for red, green and blue. The red receptors perceive the lower end of the scale and the blue receptors the high end. Thus it would make sense that on the high end we only see blue (dimmer and dimmer as it goes up.) Yet somehow we instead start seeing a new color: Violet. How come? Violet is the perception we get when both blue and red are combined. If light had two frequencies, one at blue and one at red, at proper amplitudes, we would see it as violet. However, one single frequency above blue is also seen as violet. But how? It's nowhere even near the red receptor's frequency range. How can it affect it in any way? AFAIK the answer is that frequency of violet light is twice that of the lower ranges of red light, ie. it's one octave higher. Violet light does trigger the red receptors as well due to this, and that's why we see it as violet.
Patashu
He/Him
Joined: 10/2/2005
Posts: 4043
Warp wrote:
AFAIK the answer is that frequency of violet light is twice that of the lower ranges of red light, ie. it's one octave higher. Violet light does trigger the red receptors as well due to this, and that's why we see it as violet.
If true, this is really interesting! Do you have a source?
My Chiptune music, made in Famitracker: http://soundcloud.com/patashu My twitch. I stream mostly shmups & rhythm games http://twitch.tv/patashu My youtube, again shmups and rhythm games and misc stuff: http://youtube.com/user/patashu
TASVideosGrue
They/Them
Joined: 10/1/2008
Posts: 2785
Location: The dark corners of the TASVideos server
om, nom, nom... sweet!
Banned User
Joined: 3/10/2004
Posts: 7698
Location: Finland
Patashu wrote:
Warp wrote:
AFAIK the answer is that frequency of violet light is twice that of the lower ranges of red light, ie. it's one octave higher. Violet light does trigger the red receptors as well due to this, and that's why we see it as violet.
If true, this is really interesting! Do you have a source?
Unfortunately no. If you ask about it out there, you will get as many different answers as people you ask (or even more.)