Noxxa
They/Them
Moderator, Expert player (4126)
Joined: 8/14/2009
Posts: 4090
Location: The Netherlands
http://www.youtube.com/Noxxa <dwangoAC> This is a TAS (...). Not suitable for all audiences. May cause undesirable side-effects. May contain emulator abuse. Emulator may be abusive. This product contains glitches known to the state of California to cause egg defects. <Masterjun> I'm just a guy arranging bits in a sequence which could potentially amuse other people looking at these bits <adelikat> In Oregon Trail, I sacrificed my own family to save time. In Star trek, I killed helpless comrades in escape pods to save time. Here, I kill my allies to save time. I think I need help.
aiqiyou
He/Him
Skilled player (1828)
Joined: 8/4/2018
Posts: 95
Location: China
Speedy TAS of 2020 was deleted?
Noxxa
They/Them
Moderator, Expert player (4126)
Joined: 8/14/2009
Posts: 4090
Location: The Netherlands
aiqiyou wrote:
Speedy TAS of 2020 was deleted?
Yes. Speedy TAS had several issues every year: - "Speedy" is inherently hard to define. Unlike Glitchy or Lucky, we can't filter out TASes based on specific tags (and a "speedy TAS" tag would be practically impossible to define or police) - People misunderstanding the award when nominating. If a TAS skips 90% of content, that's a short TAS, not a speedy TAS. We consistently got many of these kinds of nominations every year, even from veteran users. - We tried to fix this by requiring people to include explanations with their nominations. This mainly led to a lot of arguing both publicly and privately about what sorts of explanations were valid, and all nominations required reviewing which took up a lot of time. - Even beyond the nominations, various people disagreed on the direction of the award - does it belong simply to the fastest movie, or the most entertaining movie that happens to be fast? Are movies where the game itself runs faster than what's reasonably intended (e.g. on DOS) counted as speedy, or does it have to be the character relative to the environment? There have been some strong opinions here, which caused complaints from people that some award candidates did not fit their vision of the award. Ultimately, site administration came to the conclusion that the award has run its course.
http://www.youtube.com/Noxxa <dwangoAC> This is a TAS (...). Not suitable for all audiences. May cause undesirable side-effects. May contain emulator abuse. Emulator may be abusive. This product contains glitches known to the state of California to cause egg defects. <Masterjun> I'm just a guy arranging bits in a sequence which could potentially amuse other people looking at these bits <adelikat> In Oregon Trail, I sacrificed my own family to save time. In Star trek, I killed helpless comrades in escape pods to save time. Here, I kill my allies to save time. I think I need help.
aiqiyou
He/Him
Skilled player (1828)
Joined: 8/4/2018
Posts: 95
Location: China
I have an idea, how about adding a new award: Notable Improvement of the year?
Spikestuff
They/Them
Editor, Publisher, Expert player (2649)
Joined: 10/12/2011
Posts: 6444
Location: The land down under.
aiqiyou wrote:
I have an idea, how about adding a new award: Notable Improvement of the year?
http://tasvideos.org/Movies-Notable-Y2020.html Cause it has to be done by the Publisher and even then the Publisher would miss like very important ones that should have the tag: [4314] GC Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door by Malleoz in 1:47:09.03 It's also highly catered to specific TASes making the entire thing redundant. (Publishers also have a bias on what is and what isn't a notable improvement.)
WebNations/Sabih wrote:
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
Disables Comments and Ratings for the YouTube account. Something better for yourself and also others.