(Link to video)
This TAS completes the 100% category of the game, which is defined as seeing the complete map before catching Jerry. It is much faster than the any% category which just catches Jerry as early as possible.
The any% TAS doesn’t show off much of the movement tech in this game, so this category gives the opportunity to show off a bit more.
I originally got the inspiration to put this TAS together after talking to arnaud33200 during making my speed run review video on the game. During this process, me and arnaud33200 have both been grinding this category RTA. That speedrun review video looks into the game in detail and explains the tech used in both categories. If you’re interested it can be found here: https://youtu.be/BhY61X8PPm4

Walk through walls glitch

The glitch saves a lot of time in this category. It can be done by letting go of right on particular frames when Tom is bonking into a wall. If you are not pressing right on the correct frames, you’ll walk through the wall. In RTA this will feel like tapping right with a particular rhythm.

General tech and optimisation

Since you’re trying to get to the end of each level, it’s best to keep Jerry moving so that the screen scrolls. The initial concern is that this would make the game too autoscroller-y but this wasn’t the case. I had to try pretty hard to keep the screen scrolling as fast as possible, so it remains interesting.
The 100% category is defined as seeing all the screen (having the map scroll as far as possible before catching Jerry). This is really important, for example in level 2 where I catch him on the earliest possible pixel. I thought of an alternate definition which would have Jerry lie down before you can catch him, but I went with the RTA definition of scrolling the map. I’m pretty sure you’re not supposed to be able to catch Jerry at the end of level 6, so the waiting for him to lie down definition wouldn’t work. The only way I manage to catch him at the end of level 6 if by catching him before he climbs up before the dog.
Most of the speed up in this category is done with the walk through walls glitch, as well as taking damage to get through obstacles quicker. I also do a fake out run (run stop run) to make Jerry run fast without throwing bombs. I have to be sure not to actually get in front of Jerry otherwise I will often catch him accidentally.

Special Thanks

A huge thanks to arnaud33200 for coming up with this category and having a great back and forth with me about the cool speed tech in this game. Thanks to Wrayal for finding the walk through walls glitch.

ThunderAxe31: Claiming for judging.
ThunderAxe31: All right, I see the game itself doesn't provide any definition of full completion. So the speedrunning community, or more specifically arnaud33200, had to come up with a definition that works, even though it may look unconventional. The definition is clear and definite, so we can use it for TAS records.
Accepting as a new branch.

despoa: Processing...

TASVideoAgent
They/Them
Moderator
Joined: 8/3/2004
Posts: 14855
Location: 127.0.0.1
Banned User, Player (197)
Joined: 1/6/2023
Posts: 263
I'm not really sure how to feel about this. There's lots of extra rooms and levels skipped in even 100% runs. The term "100%" here is kind of made up. At the same time, if you're waiting until the end to catch him, obviously this gives some leeway to not perform at the top level. Sorry. It's a no from me.
Published TASes: #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12 Please consider voting for me as Rookie TASer Of 2023 - Voting is in December 2023 My rule is quality TASes over quantity TASes... unless I'm bored.
Judge, Skilled player (1278)
Joined: 9/12/2016
Posts: 1645
Location: Italy
The only thing that bugs me, is that maybe you want to use a more self-explanatory label for the branch. Maybe something like "100% levels" or "full levels".
my personal page - my YouTube channel - my GitHub - my Discord: thunderaxe31 <Masterjun> if you look at the "NES" in a weird angle, it actually clearly says "GBA"
Player (15)
Joined: 11/24/2012
Posts: 42
Location: Toronto (Canada)
I'm the one who came up with this 100% simply because there are nothing more that can be done in the game. There is no score, there are no items, enemies cannot be killed. The game is all about surviving and catching jerry whenever there is a chance. The only thing would be the health, but I don't think it's count as collectable from https://tasvideos.org/PublisherGuidelines#PercentageAndCountsInLabels, probably it would fall under "use labels such as "0%" or "100%" only if there was nothing less or more". But if we consider as "does not have a built-in definition" then it would be under "100% levels" indeed.
Judge, Skilled player (1278)
Joined: 9/12/2016
Posts: 1645
Location: Italy
arnaud33200 wrote:
I'm the one who came up with this 100% simply because there are nothing more that can be done in the game. There is no score, there are no items, enemies cannot be killed. The game is all about surviving and catching jerry whenever there is a chance. The only thing would be the health, but I don't think it's count as collectable from https://tasvideos.org/PublisherGuidelines#PercentageAndCountsInLabels, probably it would fall under "use labels such as "0%" or "100%" only if there was nothing less or more". But if we consider as "does not have a built-in definition" then it would be under "100% levels" indeed.
Thank you! I like the compromise of a label that isn't too much different from what has been already used in the speedrunning community. It's not up to me to decide though, as I'm not a publisher, but I still felt like I had to bring up the problem. The label itself may not be enough to explain this definition of full-completion, but it's not like it can be any clearer, it's just that the definition itself unavoidably ends up being unconventional. So, a proper explanation will be necessary in the publication page after this movie gets published.
my personal page - my YouTube channel - my GitHub - my Discord: thunderaxe31 <Masterjun> if you look at the "NES" in a weird angle, it actually clearly says "GBA"
fsvgm777
She/Her
Senior Publisher, Player (221)
Joined: 5/28/2009
Posts: 1185
Location: Luxembourg
Personally, I'm more in favour of "full levels", as the full level is shown for each stage. "100% levels" feels a bit awkward to read for me.
Steam Community page - Cohost profile Oh, I'm just a concerned observer.
Site Admin, Skilled player (1236)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11264
Location: RU
fsvgm777 wrote:
Personally, I'm more in favour of "full levels", as the full level is shown for each stage. "100% levels" feels a bit awkward to read for me.
Agreed.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Editor, Publisher, Player (46)
Joined: 10/15/2021
Posts: 370
I'm gonna go with "complete levels" as I think that gets the point across more than "full levels".
Player (15)
Joined: 11/24/2012
Posts: 42
Location: Toronto (Canada)
it's just that the definition itself unavoidably ends up being unconventional
yes it makes sense
I'm gonna go with "complete levels" as I think that gets the point across more than "full levels".
I would prefere "full levels", kind of "full length" but that's a personal preference I guess
Editor, Publisher, Player (46)
Joined: 10/15/2021
Posts: 370
"Full levels" it is then.
Post subject: Movie published
TASVideoAgent
They/Them
Moderator
Joined: 8/3/2004
Posts: 14855
Location: 127.0.0.1
This movie has been published. The posts before this message apply to the submission, and posts after this message apply to the published movie. ---- [5207] SMS Tom and Jerry: The Movie "full levels" by The8bitbeast in 07:20.53