If your computer can't handle a simple video codec, then you don't deserve to see it anyway.
Not as punishment for having a terrible computer, but because you are an inferior human being.
-Oz.
If practice makes perfect, but nobody's perfect, why practice?
If your computer can't handle a simple video codec, then you don't deserve to see it anyway.
Not as punishment for having a terrible computer, but because you are an inferior human being.
No its not simple, the requirements are higher, thats even why some anime groups won't go to h264 yet, so watch your mouth. And why are you flamming me for a codec that requires high cpu usage? Just stating a fact.
If that wasnt true then people wouldn't be complaining about it. Especially experienced encoders.
If you think a person is valued by how many possesions he has or how good his possesions they have. Then you better rethink your life over or something.
Earthly possesions don't last forever. How could you switch the subject like that and start flamming me right on the spot? Here I will show you what rule you are breaking.
http://tasvideos.org/ForumRules.html#post_content_ wrote:
The posting is encouraged to stay civilized. This means that flaming, trolling, insults and acts of retaliation are not allowed. If you are angry to someone, it is recommended to wait for 24 hours before responding.
Show me where I mention you specifically and I'll not only apologize, but I will, in fact, leave these forums and never come back.
Until then, cool it.
-Oz.
If practice makes perfect, but nobody's perfect, why practice?
YOur reply was right after my reply. Therefore actually then you flammed two people , the one guy above me too. You don't need to specifically tell someone, but your reply did show you meant us two.
Ozmodiar wrote:
If your computer can't handle a simple video codec, then you don't deserve to see it anyway.
Not as punishment for having a terrible computer, but because you are an inferior human being.
Since your reply was right after my reply and you used the word "you" then it does mean you were talking to me.
Plus , even if it wasnt a rule, you still think its cool to insult people that don't have things and are less forntuante then you are?
But if you used the word "people" or "anyone" then that would be refering to everyone, but since you used the word "you" then you were referring to me and breaking the rules, don't try to deny it.
Joined: 8/1/2004
Posts: 2687
Location: Seattle, WA
The words are 'flamed' and 'flaming'. Neither of which took place here. Just one passive aggresive statement that was circuitously countered with another passive aggressive statement.
YOur reply was right after my reply. Therefore actually then you flammed two people , the one guy above me too. You don't need to specifically tell someone, but your reply did show you meant us two.
Ozmodiar wrote:
If your computer can't handle a simple video codec, then you don't deserve to see it anyway.
Not as punishment for having a terrible computer, but because you are an inferior human being.
Since your reply was right after my reply and you used the word "you" then it does mean you were talking to me.
Plus , even if it wasnt a rule, you still think its cool to insult people that don't have things and are less forntuante then you are?
"You" is widely accepted and is common practice to mean "anyone".
Also, did you consider that I might have posted in the wrong topic? I was just stating what I believe to be fact.
In addition, the belief that a person is valued by the amount and overall worth of their possessions is one that I hold dear. I apologize it offends you, but it's not going to change.
-Oz.
If practice makes perfect, but nobody's perfect, why practice?
YOur reply was right after my reply. Therefore actually then you flammed two people , the one guy above me too. You don't need to specifically tell someone, but your reply did show you meant us two.
Ozmodiar wrote:
If your computer can't handle a simple video codec, then you don't deserve to see it anyway.
Not as punishment for having a terrible computer, but because you are an inferior human being.
Since your reply was right after my reply and you used the word "you" then it does mean you were talking to me.
Plus , even if it wasnt a rule, you still think its cool to insult people that don't have things and are less forntuante then you are?
"You" is widely accepted and is common practice to mean "anyone".
Also, did you consider that I might have posted in the wrong topic? I was just stating what I believe to be fact.
In addition, the belief that a person is valued by the amount and overall worth of their possessions is one that I hold dear. I apologize it offends you, but it's not going to change.
Make sure you tell that to God then, btw look up a few posts I editied something in there.
This is what I added
But if you used the word "people" or "anyone" then that would be refering to everyone, but since you used the word "you" then you were referring to me and breaking the rules, don't try to deny it.
You are just trying to deny it. Even in writing if you are saying the word you then reader assumes that he is talking to the person that is reader. You meant me don't try to deny it.
I don't need to tell anything to your god.
Edit: The statement was a conditional one. Although it includes you, it wasn't directed specifically at you. Though I could see how it was misconstrued. You're not getting an apology though.
-Oz.
If practice makes perfect, but nobody's perfect, why practice?
No , I'm not talking my god. I'm talking about thee God, cause there is only one God and eventually we are all going to be judged.
You cannot state that there is one true god for all to be judged under. Doing so is erroneus and, quite truthfully, a statement of arrogance and ignorance. Neither of us could ever be right about this subject, so how about we stop derailing this thread?
-Oz.
If practice makes perfect, but nobody's perfect, why practice?
It is the other way around, believing that there isnt a God is just ignorant. There is no way we would be existance if there wasnt. Things just don't happen by themselves. Even in the Bible, God says there isnt anything such as an athesit. They simply just deny God or don't want to follow his ways.
It is the other way around, believing that there isnt a God is just ignorant. There is no way we would be existance if there wasnt. Things just don't happen by themselves.
I never said there wasn't a god. Maybe I didn't explicitly state it, but I certainly alluded to the fact that our gods are not the same.
Also, have you heard of evolution?
-Oz.
If practice makes perfect, but nobody's perfect, why practice?
There is no way we would be existance if there wasnt.
There is no way someone like you should have existed, especially in this thread.
Anything you will reply to this with is going to be ignorant, by the name of the God. Amen.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
It is the other way around, believing that there isnt a God is just ignorant. There is no way we would be existance if there wasnt. Things just don't happen by themselves.
I never said there wasn't a god. Maybe I didn't explicitly state it, but I certainly alluded to the fact that our gods are not the same.
Also, have you heard of evolution?
Yes, I have, but you are taking the part where it says "THEORY OF EVOLUTION" Plus, evolution teaches that we we started out as dust in space or something and evolved but thats impossible. If we start out as 3 month baby we would not survive without a parent. What it teaches in the Bible is that God made man, animals, stuff like that. Which has more meaning about our life and truth.
But I'm having fun. We're having a legitimate argument! My only regret is derailing this thread, but HiddenGamer refuses to desist.
Either do you, don't blame this on me, you started by breaking the rules and then making an excuse for it. You keep replying to me and I keep replying to you, so if its anything its both of our faults, but I say its yours because you started flamming. So don't blame this on me.
It is the other way around, believing that there isnt a God is just ignorant. There is no way we would be existance if there wasnt. Things just don't happen by themselves.
I never said there wasn't a god. Maybe I didn't explicitly state it, but I certainly alluded to the fact that our gods are not the same.
Also, have you heard of evolution?
Yes, I have, but you are taking the part where it says "THEORY OF EVOLUTION" Plus, evolution teaches that we we started out as dust in space or something and evolved but thats impossible. If we start out as 3 month baby we would not survive without a parent. What it teaches in the Bible is that God made man, animals, stuff like that. Which has more meaning about our life and truth.
The human race wasn't created out of nothingness.. hence, evolution. Though you don't state that, you allude to it by specifically referring to having no parents.
-Oz.
If practice makes perfect, but nobody's perfect, why practice?
But I'm having fun. We're having a legitimate argument! My only regret is derailing this thread, but HiddenGamer refuses to desist.
Either do you, don't blame this on me, you started by breaking the rules and then making an excuse for it. You keep replying to me and I keep replying to you, so if its anything its both of our faults, but I say its yours because you started flamming. So don't blame this on me.
I suggested we stop derailing the thread. You ignored it and continue to reply. I tried once, and I'm not going to have you get the last word in unless it's an admittal of defeat. Unless we agree to stop, nothing short of mod intervention will cease this discussion.
Edit: Or continue it, by moving it. :o
-Oz.
If practice makes perfect, but nobody's perfect, why practice?
