Ok, this would be quite rude to the viewers but wouldn't you gain time by naming all the characters the empty string, that is - no letter at all? It would save frames in loads of dialogboxes, right? This is however very easy to spot so I guess it can have been thought about before, but wasn't wanted perhaps.
Going to stick my hand in the hornet hive here and address all the arguments I see against publishing movies too quickly: Not enough people have a chance to watch it and comment on it. I don't see how the fact that a movie is published or not negatively affects the audience's ability to watch or comment on it. In fact, publishing it quickly would achieve the opposite effect. There isn't enough time to evaluate it and check for mistakes. Even if an improvement is discovered a few minutes after publication, is there a problem with simply obsoleting or canceling the current movie and publishing the improvement? This doesn't seem to be either a common or important enough problem to warrant delaying an obviously publishable movie. It's unfair to the less popular movies. Less popular movies by nature take longer to evaluate than the popular ones; a movie which should be published shouldn't be delayed because another movie which should be published is taking longer to assess. An established maximum workbench time would help in cases where unpopular movies stay in there for far longer than they should, but a minimum would only serve to hurt the more popular movies. Giving a minimum amount of time in the workbench would help standardize publications. This one has some validity. Standardization for the sake of standardization when the movie in question is obviously publishable material, however, is not something I agree with. Of course, this is merely a matter of opinion. But I digress. You guys are awesome.
Damn, we are doing this for free. We shouldn't have a salary of insults
Insult salad
Slowbeef
Got pwned by an earthquake