I must say, this is quite an amazing run. The way you shelled those clips and blocked those duplications was pretty impressive. However, I notice you are not using the recommended ZSNES 1.51; perhaps you should redo this run on that emulator and resubmit.
30 seconds? Are you high? That's insane! I get bored in a span of 10 seconds!
If you're asking if this can be synced on Bizhawk/lsnes, it's a straight up no. The game doesn't even run on either emulator. snes9x master race
The fact you'd rather an older, slower run performed on the same emulator remain on the site while the faster one gets rejected is fucking ridiculous. Then the site would be stuck with an "inaccurate" but unoptimized run (as opposed to just an inaccurate one) until somebody does it on Bizhawk/lsnes - what if it takes years or never even happens? This is a huge flaw in logic. Yes vote. I'm unfamiliar with the game but I found it entertaining :)
Did you read the first sentence?
I like this idea but not how you suggested it. The way I would do it would be to have a required category submission process for new categories or amendments that would require judge approval before an actual run submission. The debate could be done in the category submission.
There has still been no firm date set for the disallowance of SNES9X, although switching to Bizhawk would be a good idea regardless, as its' emulation is more accurate.
I'd say that the current goals (reach high score, then end wave) qualify it for Vault since it can be argued that there is no new content; however, a Stage 35 TAS (complete fastest possible wave, since there are no new speeds) or Stage 39 TAS (complete last wave before the wave set repeats) has the potential to obsolete it then.
...watch it in parts then?
I'm not aware of any exceptions to the rule being made other than those stated publicly in the continuances forum. A continuance was not made for this movie. Note: I'm not agreeing/disagreeing with any policy in this post. Simply pointing out that I think you are wrong in your assessment that "popular" movies have been unfairly handled in regards to the rule.
There were some exceptions though, but only for the runs that were extremely well received.
Thanks for the support CoolKirby... it's hard to get some it seems... By the way, I don't mind people voting No, but I'm interested in some comment explaining the vote, so I can learn how to improve stuff and what people find interesting.
Voting No because it doesn't offer anything new over our current SMB run. It's probably vaultable though.
Slightly unrelated, I'm still somewhat interested in a low score run of one of these games.