(Link to video)
Submission Text Full Submission Page

Rush'n Attack TAS "1-player" in 0:09:45:77 by McBobX

Goals

  • Aims for fastest time possible
  • 1-player
  • Genre:Action
  • Genre:Plateform
feos: There is already a faster published branch for this game, and it is in Vault. This movie's goal then is ineligible for Vault, but it was not liked, so it's not for Moons either. Rejecting.

Show more

Hide
Posted: 6/22/2013 9:41 PM
Quote
TASVideoAgent
They/Them
Moderator
Joined: 8/3/2004
Posts: 14878
Location: 127.0.0.1
This topic is for the purpose of discussing #3993: McBobX's NES Rush'n Attack "1-player" in 09:45.77
Posted: 6/22/2013 10:17 PM
Quote
hegyak
Editor
Joined: 3/31/2010
Posts: 1466
Location: Not playing Puyo Tetris
This run is slower then: http://tasvideos.org/1000S.html Why?
When TAS does Quake 1, SDA will declare war. The Prince doth arrive he doth please.
Posted: 6/22/2013 10:25 PM
Quote
Tangent
Joined: 3/9/2009
Posts: 530
hegyak wrote:
This run is slower then: http://tasvideos.org/1000S.html Why?
He's submitted a lot of runs that don't beat existing records without any explanation. http://tasvideos.org/Subs-2727up.html
Posted: 6/22/2013 10:27 PM
Quote
McBobX
Experienced player (543)
Joined: 11/18/2011
Posts: 245
Location: Morocco
hegyak wrote:
This run is slower then: http://tasvideos.org/1000S.html Why?
But this uses 2-players This run is faster the last 1-player run http://tasvideos.org/49M.html I was submiting runs without reading rules
I still learn more about English. https://www.youtube.com/user/McBobX100
I wrote:
Working is the best way to achieve goals in speedruning. Hardworking is a pain.
Posted: 6/23/2013 8:30 AM
Quote
NhatNM
He/Him
Experienced player (705)
Joined: 6/17/2009
Posts: 600
Location: Vietnam
hmm then if any game can play with 2 players then we can make 2 TAS, 1 for 1 player, 2 for 2 players :D I think why don't make "pacifist", maybe it'll look better. Is it right ? :D
A man come from Vietnam My YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/NhatNM/playlists
Posted: 6/23/2013 8:33 AM
(Edited: 6/23/2013 12:21 PM)
Quote
feos
Site Admin, Skilled player (1236)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11268
Location: RU
NES TAS of 2011
If the audience feels 1-payer run looks too similar to 2-payer run and doesn't enjoy it, it is rejected. Same for pacifist/no damage/whatever. I'm voting No on this run. It really looks like an inferiour version of the already vaulted 2P run. Hint: Making unvaultable versions of already vaulted runs is a bad idea in general.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Posted: 6/23/2013 12:20 PM
Quote
NitroGenesis
He/Him
Editor, Experienced player (551)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
feos wrote:
If the audience feels 1-payer run looks too similar to 2-payer run and doesn't enjoy it, it is rejected. Same for pacifist/no damage/whatever. I'm voting No on this run. It really looks like an inferiour version of the already vaulted 1P run.
There is no current 1P run of this game, so which run are you talking about?
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.
Posted: 6/23/2013 12:21 PM
Quote
feos
Site Admin, Skilled player (1236)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11268
Location: RU
NES TAS of 2011
Fixed.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Posted: 6/23/2013 2:08 PM
Quote
Spikestuff
They/Them
Editor, Publisher, Expert player (2292)
Joined: 10/12/2011
Posts: 6337
Location: The land down under.
Flash TASer of 2022 PSX TASer of 2016
I hit yes... I am dumb. Someone please fix that... PLEASE - Wasn't entertained - Slower than another run No Vote (Someone edit my yes to a no- I did it without paying attention >.>)
WebNations/Sabih wrote:
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
Disables Comments and Ratings for the YouTube account. Something better for yourself and also others.
Posted: 6/24/2013 4:36 PM
Quote
Cardboard
Skilled player (1670)
Joined: 6/11/2006
Posts: 818
Location: Arboga, Sweden
NES TAS of 2008 Rookie of 2007 GBx TASer of 2007
I'm questioning the level of optimization. There's a lot of climbing ladders only to later jump down again. In the final level, there even was a crouch to dodge a bullet which I really can't see how it can be justified.
Warp wrote:
omg lol this is so fake!!!1 the nes cant produce music like this!
Posted: 6/26/2013 2:09 PM
Quote
TASVideosGrue
They/Them
Joined: 10/1/2008
Posts: 2738
Location: The dark corners of the TASVideos server
om, nom, nom... 'twas dry