Submission Text Full Submission Page Publication Page
First I want to thank by Mitjitsu and SwordlessLink. Without their run, this run wouldn't be possible. This run saves 139 frames = about 2.317 seconds. Thank you mr_roberts_z for fixing my spelling a little bit.
  • Video Plugin: Jabo's Direct3D8 1.6
  • Sound Plugin: Jabo's DirectSound 1.6
  • Input Plugin: TAS Input Plugin 0.6
  • RSP Plugin: RSP emulation Plugin
adelikat: Accepting as an improvement to the published movie.

Show more

Hide
1 2 3
Posted: 8/27/2007 8:35 PM
Quote
TASVideoAgent
They/Them
Moderator
Joined: 8/3/2004
Posts: 15577
Location: 127.0.0.1
This topic is for the purpose of discussing #1679: Rikku's N64 Super Mario 64 "1 star" in 06:44.95
Posted: 8/27/2007 8:36 PM
Quote
mr_roberts_z
Former player
Joined: 7/21/2006
Posts: 747
Location: Northern Hemisphere
This is great...a new generation of "SM64 wars", if it ever comes to that. Until a 0 star run is possible (which I'm sure it will be sometime), the shortest run of SM64 can truly be 100% frame perfect. Here's a YES vote, hoping to bring about that perfection with each new run that comes out. Oh, and nice camera angles.
Super Mario 64 TASes and stuff.
Posted: 8/27/2007 8:37 PM
Quote
Fabian
Former player
Joined: 6/15/2005
Posts: 1711
Sweet beans. Great job!
Zoey Ridin' High <Fabian_> I prett much never drunk
Posted: 8/27/2007 8:51 PM
Quote
Soulrivers
Former player
Joined: 12/27/2006
Posts: 532
Location: Göteborg, Sweden
Awesome. Looks very very tight without any appearant flaws. I wasn't very fond of the camera angles in Bowser 3, it seems like you did your best to hide where you were going at some parts. Yes vote anyway.
My published movies [03:45:05] <Naohiro19> Soulrivers: ... [03:45:19] <Soulrivers> ? [03:46:35] <Naohiro19> <Soulrivers> No! <Naohiro19> So? <Soulrivers> Yes! [03:46:48] <Naohiro19> joke
Posted: 8/27/2007 9:00 PM
Quote
adelikat
He/Him
Emulator Coder, Site Developer, Site Owner, Expert player (3573)
Joined: 11/3/2004
Posts: 4754
Location: Tennessee
TASer of 2010 NES TASer of 2010 DS TASer of 2010 Arcade TAS of 2010 NES TASer of 2008 NES TAS of 2008 Funny TAS of 2008 TASer of 2007 NES TASer of 2007 Funny TAS of 2007
Very nice.
It's hard to look this good. My TAS projects
Posted: 8/27/2007 9:03 PM
(Edited: 8/27/2007 9:08 PM)
Quote
Chamale
He/Him
Player (182)
Joined: 10/20/2006
Posts: 1355
Location: Canada
Yes vote. Wow, SM64 has so many videos. Not that I'm complaining. EDIT: 11, including CCless, this, BLJless, and all the published ones.
Posted: 8/27/2007 9:07 PM
Quote
Raiscan
Joined: 11/11/2006
Posts: 1235
Location: United Kingdom
Yes vote, though I'm not too sure about some of the camera angles (Bowser in the sky and the clicky inny-outy when you first enter the castle. blech). Bowser in the fire sea and the battle were nice. Good job.
<adelikat> I am annoyed at my irc statements ending up in forums & sigs
Posted: 8/27/2007 9:10 PM
Quote
evilchen
Joined: 6/9/2006
Posts: 614
Location: Mettmann
yes vote(at least i hope lol 1 no, i hope i did not misclick XD)!
https://www.youtube.com/user/armitageyt
Posted: 8/27/2007 9:13 PM
Quote
Raiscan
Joined: 11/11/2006
Posts: 1235
Location: United Kingdom
evilchen wrote:
yes vote(at least i hope lol 1 no, i hope i did not misclick XD)!
If it wasn't you, I'd be interested to hear the reasoning for the no vote.
<adelikat> I am annoyed at my irc statements ending up in forums & sigs
Posted: 8/27/2007 9:42 PM
Quote
upthorn
He/Him
Emulator Coder, Active player (391)
Joined: 3/24/2006
Posts: 1802
Sega TAS of 2011 Sega TAS of 2010 Sega TAS of 2008 Sega TASer of 2007
Can the submitter add some explanation of what was done differently here than in AKA & Swordless Link's run? 2 seconds in 405 are kind of hard to notice normally.
How fleeting are all human passions compared with the massive continuity of ducks.
Posted: 8/27/2007 10:10 PM
Quote
this_is_me
Joined: 4/30/2007
Posts: 150
well here we go again obligatory yes
Posted: 8/28/2007 12:12 AM
Quote
ZeXr0
Joined: 8/27/2006
Posts: 883
I don't think that voting no and don't give an explanation isn't really representative . . .
Posted: 8/28/2007 12:23 AM
Quote
Halamantariel
Player (105)
Joined: 1/30/2005
Posts: 564
Location: Québec, Canada
ZeXr0 wrote:
I don't think voting no without giving an explanation represents anything.
Fixed.
Posted: 8/28/2007 12:50 AM
Quote
Paused
Joined: 5/9/2005
Posts: 752
Because things went so well the last time this type of SM64 run was given a no explanation. Anyway, will probs vote yes if I watch it for it being faster than a run that was purely based on speed.
Posted: 8/28/2007 1:11 AM
Quote
Wockes
Joined: 5/17/2007
Posts: 393
Location: Sweden
This run saves 2.317 seconds and 139 frames
Wait what? Anyway gonna look at this later
"No love for the game gear"
Posted: 8/28/2007 2:01 AM
Quote
hero_of_the_day
Player (89)
Joined: 11/14/2005
Posts: 1058
Location: United States
139 frames = 2.317 seconds. Good run. Though I have said it before and I will say it again, it really is pointless to shave off a couple seconds when we all know a 0 star run will eventually be made. Anywho, voting yes.
They're off to find the hero of the day...
Posted: 8/28/2007 2:53 AM
Quote
Kles
Joined: 7/28/2005
Posts: 339
I didn't think I'd say this, but this run is inexplicably more entertaining than the last one. I still don't like it as much as the 16 star run, but it's good enough to give a yes vote to.
Posted: 8/28/2007 3:10 AM
Quote
Chamale
He/Him
Player (182)
Joined: 10/20/2006
Posts: 1355
Location: Canada
hero of the day wrote:
139 frames = 2.317 seconds. Good run. Though I have said it before and I will say it again, it really is pointless to shave off a couple seconds when we all know a 0 star run will eventually be made. Anywho, voting yes.
Yeah, let's never make TASes again so we can just wait for quantum computers, which undoubtedly will do better than us.
Posted: 8/28/2007 3:13 AM
Quote
AQwertyZ
Joined: 12/3/2006
Posts: 131
Location: Seattle
I loved it. The new camera angles were at times questionable but other times they were amazing. For people wanting to know how the time was shaved off the run, here are the improvements I observed: - Faster BLJ in Bowser 1. - Faster BLJ into Dire Dire Docks - In Bowser 2, jumps and dives instead of doing long jumps across the edge of the upper lava area. There may be other improvements that I didn't notice though. Anyway, voting yes.
Posted: 8/28/2007 3:15 AM
Quote
Twelvepack
Joined: 5/2/2006
Posts: 1020
Location: Boulder, CO
Yes vote. looked really nice.
Has never colored a dinosaur.
Posted: 8/28/2007 4:00 AM
Quote
Morrison
He/Him
Former player
Joined: 8/2/2006
Posts: 195
Location: USA
I'm glad you were able to save more time! I really didn't think the new movie would be improved on so fast. I hope this isn't the last run of the game we see :)
twitch.tv/Retrogaming2084
Posted: 8/28/2007 5:35 AM
Quote
hero_of_the_day
Player (89)
Joined: 11/14/2005
Posts: 1058
Location: United States
oh silly chalame :) I was just saying effort could be put towards finding large improvements instead of microscopic ones. I am not exactly sure how you related that to quantum computers, but then again, you are you.
They're off to find the hero of the day...
Posted: 8/28/2007 6:00 AM
Quote
bkDJ
Joined: 7/26/2006
Posts: 1215
Wow, with the improvemetns I did notice (quicker BLJ stop in Bowser 1, much faster DDD entry most notably and better angles in the last half of Bowser 3) I'm surprised this is not even 3 seconds faster. Still, excellent camera work for some new angles. Yes vote.
Posted: 8/28/2007 7:10 AM
Quote
Sir_VG
He/Him
Player (40)
Joined: 10/9/2004
Posts: 1913
Location: Floating Tower
I'm voting no because your submission text sux0r! U FAIL! (No really, I vote yes.)
Taking over the world, one game at a time. Currently TASing: Nothing
Posted: 8/28/2007 7:57 AM
Quote
hopper
Joined: 11/15/2004
Posts: 804
Location: Canada
The camera work was really lousy in the beginning. The clicky inny-outty thing is annoying, which didn't bode well. The camera follows Mario really close, which makes it hard to tell what's going on and enjoy what Mario is doing. In Bowser 1, the camera inexplicably cuts away from Bowser and zooms in on Mario just as Bowser touches the bomb, so we don't get to see him getting launched backwards off of it, which would have been more entertaining. By this point I expected the rest of the video to be crap. Then it turned around. The camera for the Bowser 2 fight finally zoomed out enough to see what was going on, and Mario got some huge air on those two jumps! Bowser 3 fight looked really efficient, exactly what a TAS should be. I definitely liked the second half of the movie, but I liked all of the last movie. I couldn't really notice the 2 seconds of time saved, but I could certainly notice how annoying the camera was in the first half. As a whole I didn't quite enjoy it enough to vote Yes to it, but I give it a solid Meh. Kind of a Meh+.
TASing or playing back a DOS game? Make sure your files match the archive at RGB Classic Games.
1 2 3