Submission Text Full Submission Page
囲碁 九路盤対局 is one of the many Famicom games designed to tutor or play the Game of Go. (圍棋 or 围棋 for the Chinese folks.)
Go is a board game that enjoys a fame in oriental countries comparable to that of Chess in European and American countries. In Go, the objective is to surround territory and to capture opponent's pieces, "stones", by depriving them of liberties. The player who scores more points this way, wins.
Go is one of the board games that have not been solved yet (i.e. the perfect play is not known). Furthermore, so far, nobody in the world has been able to write a computer program that plays Go better than an average club player. Therefore, in a TAS of a Go game, the skills of the player play a much more important part than the fact that you can use any tools. You can use whatever tools you wish, but still you need to actually be a good player if you intend to beat your opponent.
More information about the Game of Go:
The objective of this movie:
  • To beat the computer player as fast as possible with as high level as possible.
Other information:
  • Luck manipulation was not used.
  • To beat this movie, either beat the computer with a higher level, or equal level but faster than I did.
The levels in this game work like this:
  • At level 1, you receive 5 handicap stones (i.e. you have 5 stones on board when the opponent makes its first move). You go first.
  • At levels 1-4, you receive 5, 4, 3 or 2 handicap stones respectively. You go first.
  • At level 5, the game is even but you go first.
  • At level 6, the game is even but the computer goes first.
  • At levels 7-14, the computer receives 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 or 9 handicap stones respectively. The computer goes first.
I played on level 10: It is the setting with which I usually play against complete beginners, and I expect the computer player to be significantly better than a beginner human player.
Note: Go is normally played on a 19x19 board. This game plays on 9x9 board, which is more commonly used for short games and/or training. It may be probably more suitable for TASes than the 19x19 board.
Move-by-move explanation of this movie are below. My coordinate system is horizontally ABCDEFGHJ from left to right, vertically 123456789 from up to down.
  1. Five handicap stones were placed in the standard positions. Computer is black, I am white.
  2. E3: A rather normal beginning move on 9x9 board acquiring some foothold.
    • F4: A perfectly valid response that any strong player could do in the same situation.
  3. F7: I suspect the computer is better at playing local situations than it is at thinking ahead the relationships between different areas of the board, so I start another attack in the lower right corner.
    • F5: The computer thinks it is better to strengthen the upper right corner and the center than the corner I just attacked. But it is also keeping an eye on the F7 stone, so it is not entirely bad.
  4. C6: Played in the same spirit as the F7 stone earlier.
    • F6: The computer thought this for a long time, and then made a bad move. Perhaps it thought, better late than never. Nevertheless, the right edge is pretty safe for the computer now. I think, by now, I have already gained back one of the handicap stones' advantage. It is a bad move because of the famous empty triangle shape, and because black is overconcentrated, compared to white.
  5. E7: Makes the F7 stone stronger by increasing its liberties, and increases the pressure on the lower left corner.
    • E6: Another blunder from the computer. An empty triangle shape is not improved by making another horrible shape. It is now very obvious that black is overconcentrated: Many stones in a small lump. I did a look afterwards and saw that another move the computer thought about was D7: It would have been a lot better indeed.
  6. D7: The computer did not play this spot, so I played it. Again it strengthens the white stones already there, and puts more pressure on the lower left corner.
    • B6: The computer finally realized the danger on the lower left corner, and tries to do something about it. Unfortunately, it is a little late for that because white is already strong there, thanks to the last two moves. A better move could have been B7 (to protect that corner), or perhaps B5 (to take a claim on the upper left edge).
  7. B7: I threaten to capture black's C7 stone. The text that flashes, "あたり" (atari) means that C7 stone could be captured on white's next move because it only has one liberty left. (Yes, name of the game company Atari comes from exactly this term.)
    • C8: Black does not want to be captured, so he extends, increasing the liberties of the threatened C7 stone by two. No longer in atari.
  8. B8: C8 was what I expected black to play, and this is what I planned to play next. It keeps the attack on the C7-C8 string and threatens to atari the B6 stone as well.
    • B5: I thought black is going to play D8, to prevent white playing there. I think B5 is a good play. It prevents the attack I was planning for the B6 stone, and it also forbids me from playing elsewhere: if I ignore the lower left corner situation, black is going to play D6 next, which would mean death for all the white stones in the lower left corner.
  9. E5: My options were D6, D8 and E5.
    • If I played D6, the next moves would be D8, E8, C5. I would lose my chances of getting anything good in the upper left corner.
    • If I played D8, the computer would play D6 next, forcing me to capture at C9 sooner or later. I didn't think it's a good option.
    • E5 increases white's liberties and potential for upper left corner attacks.
    • The computer responds at D8, thinking it can get away. Unfortunately I have already calculated it, and black will find an unfavorable shortage of liberties that will lead into the capture of the C7-C8-D8 string.
  10. With E8, I keep the balance of liberties in the lower left corner in my favor.
    • Black cuts at D6. This is generally speaking a smart move, but as the black stones in the lower left corner are practically captured already, black should have played C4 instead. I think, at this point, I have gained back the advantage of three or four of the handicap stones black had.
  11. D9: This or C9 was a mandatory move, keeping the balance of liberties in white's favor. Otherwise, black could have captured either the C5-D6 string or the D7-E7-D9-E8 string, saving the doomed C7-C8-D8 string. Black is now in atari.
    • C9: A stupid move. Black is still in atari! The computer probably thought singlemindedly about the atari it placed on the white D9 stone.
  12. E9: Instead of capturing the black stones, I protected the ataried stone. I also contemplated on ignoring the local situation and playing elsewhere, but it seems doing so would have lead into my loss.
    • B9: Another stupid move. Black is still in atari! This move accomplished precisely nothing. I have now gained back surely four of the five handicap stones' value.
  13. C4: This move increases the liberties of the white C5-C6 string and opens an attack at the upper left corner, possibly with the aid of to the long-neglected white E3 stone.
    • D3: The computer does not want me to utilize the E3 stone in the attack at the corner. A good idea. However, at this point, it seems that the black string B5-B6 is rather lone and vulnerable. It has no friends nearby and black just wasted his chance of protecting those stones by playing B4 or B3. But perhaps, neither of those moves would have worked anyway.
  14. B3: Here comes my attack at the upper left corner. Black could probably respond with B2, limiting the damage.
    • Black plays E4. Just to be sure that the E3 stone doesn't do anything nasty. I think C4 would have been better. Or that B2.
  15. Because black didn't want B2, I played it. Black has just lost the upper left corner, and probably some of the upper edge as well.
    • Black thinks the upper edge is getting too complicated, and moves to simpler matters, playing F9. It puts the large white string into atari, and likely aims to close black's territory. Black probably hopes white responds with F8.
  16. Responding with F8 would be a game-losing blunder for white (black would respond with G8, capturing the white stones). I played A9. This captures the black lump instead, by depriving them of their last liberty. Now the game looks about even. White is probably already at an advantage.
    • Computer plays F8. Indeed, its plan was to close the territory. Unfortunately, F8 is a blunder, due to shortage of liberties.
  17. White's move, G8, reveals the blunder by putting the F8-F9 string to inescapable atari.
    • Black realized, "oops", and does not play G9. He plays G7, which is where he thinks the edge of his territory is now. A very proper move, all things considered.
  18. I could play G9 now to capture the two black stones. But that's only worth so many points, so I play a larger point instead. White's move is E1. It is called a monkey jump.
    • Black ignores the 10+ point loss that the monkey jump poses due to loss of territory, and continues closing off his other sore wound in the lower right corner.
  19. White's E2 connects E1 and E3, completely nullifying the purpose of black's D3 and E4 because black didn't get to capture E3 after all.
    • Black plays G9 to capture that one white stone. Big deal.
  20. White D4 cuts the black string C3-D3 off friendly stones, practically capturing them. Black has lost the game. (But black is not resigning, so white cannot claim victory yet.)
    • Black F2 closes off black's territory, preventing another devastating white move such as G1. All things considered, this is a proper move from black.
  21. I play white D2 because I would eventually need to play there anyway to prevent capture of the E1-E2-E3 string. I could have played F1 to gain one point more, but my goal is not to maximize win; my goal is a quick win.
    • Black G1 finalizes the boundary of black's territory. A proper move.
  22. E4 is a dame -- a move which is a point for neither player. If I didn't play this move, the computer would have, so it's faster this way.
    • The computer passes.
  23. I pass too. Now the game is over.
Score:
  • Black 23 points territory + 1 prisoner = 24 points
  • White 22 points territory + 9 prisoners = 31 points
White wins by 7 points.
A kifu of the game is available here: http://bisqwit.iki.fi/go/kifu/76e07cd3425f38e25ed4e756cc889c84?MM=10 (Note: in the kifu, the vertical coordinate system is bottom-oriented instead of top-oriented.)

NesVideoAgent: Hi! I am a robot. I took a few screenshots of this movie and placed them here. Here goes! Feel free to clean up the list.

Bisqwit: Cancelling the movie. It's not submitted to the right site. :P
Bisqwit: Uncancelling per request.
feos: It's quite an odd feeling to judge a submission of TASVideos' father. Thankfully, the site is now "right" enough, so I'm accepting this run for the Vault.
FractalFusion: The vault rules currently state that no board games are allowed in Vault. This game is clearly nothing more than a replay of moves, just like The Chessmaster and the various Battle Chess submissions. Furthermore, there is no appearance of any kind of TAS skill. So, even though it is an interesting Go lesson to those who love the game, I will have to reject the run.
Sorry about the confusion, Bisqwit.

adelikat: Unrejecting yet again, I think this is the right site for this now. Reconsidering based on board games being eligible for the Standard tier

adelikat: Well dang. When I unrejected this submission it was with the intent of accepting it. But as evidenced here, this game can be played on a harder difficulty and can be beaten faster. Unfortunately I must send this to the grue yet again (more times than a submission should), but this time for optimization. Though, I am happy that this is finally the right site for a submission of this kind :)


TASVideoAgent
They/Them
Moderator
Joined: 8/3/2004
Posts: 15619
Location: 127.0.0.1
This topic is for the purpose of discussing #1704: Bisqwit's NES Igo: Kyuu Roban Taikyoku in 04:50.33
Skilled player (1828)
Joined: 4/20/2005
Posts: 2161
Location: Norrköping, Sweden
I'm very sorry, but I'm gonna have to vote "no" on this... neither me or my room-mate (who watched this with me), found this entertaining to watch, and my room-mate knows a little about go. Another slightly bad thing about the game is that it's really slow. Even when turbo-ing through the movie I didn't miss anything. I think that those who knows go very well might appreciate the movie, but for the rest of us... this movie just isn't entertaining at all, sorry. :( Good job with the luck-manipulation, though. Oh, and my room-mate liked the ninjas in the corner. :)
Former player
Joined: 10/1/2006
Posts: 1102
Location: boot_camp
If chess isn't accepted then I think go doesn't stand a chance.
Borg Collective wrote:
Negotiation is irrelevant. Self-determination is irrelevant. You will be assimilated.
Editor, Active player (297)
Joined: 3/8/2004
Posts: 7469
Location: Arzareth
laughing_gas wrote:
If chess isn't accepted then I think go doesn't stand a chance.
Why's that? Randil: You mean, good job on the lack of luck manipulation? This didn't have that :) Re: Your roommate's opinion; he's right, this is not a particularly interesting match. I thought it more from the challenge standpoint. More numbers, I guess. What is the highest level and fastest time one can beat this game.
Former player
Joined: 10/1/2006
Posts: 1102
Location: boot_camp
Bisqwit wrote:
laughing_gas wrote:
If chess isn't accepted then I think go doesn't stand a chance.
Why's that?
Chess and go are about the same on the level of entertainment: zilch. Fractalfusion mentioned he had a chess movie sometime ago but never submitted it for this reason, and I recall I also got some fire for suggesting to submit a SNES chess game.
Borg Collective wrote:
Negotiation is irrelevant. Self-determination is irrelevant. You will be assimilated.
Tub
Joined: 6/25/2005
Posts: 1377
Luck manipulation was not used.
Why not? What makes this movie stand out when compared to an unassisted game? 350 rerecords isn't much, how were they used?
m00
Editor, Active player (297)
Joined: 3/8/2004
Posts: 7469
Location: Arzareth
Tub wrote:
Luck manipulation was not used.
Why not? What makes this movie stand out when compared to an unassisted game? 350 rerecords isn't much, how were they used?
Because I think that any move the computer makes will be approximately equally stupid. This is no Monopoly; the game does not take chances. It uses an algorithm to determine reasonable moves (within its ability) and picks one of those choices randomly. Re: compared to an unassisted game -- aside from white's fast turns, nothing really. I did use rerecords in checking a few options, but any good player can do that by simply reading. The rerecords were mostly used in frameperfecting the placement of each stone.
Post subject: boring (n.): this
Banned User
Joined: 12/23/2004
Posts: 1850
I wish I had discovered this movie hours ago when I was suffering from insomnia. Voting "no". Slow, boring, repitive and annoying music, stupid CPU. Nothing suprising or exciting.
Perma-banned
Banned User
Joined: 3/10/2004
Posts: 7698
Location: Finland
Curiously, the same things are said about the various RPG games (slow, boring, have to turbo through most of the game, only people who have played the game can appreciate it...) yet RPG TASes are published even though they are hours long instead of a few minutes like this one. I find this contradiction rather amusing.
Joined: 1/14/2005
Posts: 216
I agree with you that RPG TASes in general are very boring, but many people (including judges) don't feel this way. On the other hand, I haven't heard anyone say that this movie isn't boring. So this is a contradiction to you only because you are closed-minded. I have also never understood why "have to turbo through most of the game" and "only people who have played the game can appreciate it" are even considered negative. It's as if the intended audience is people who have never seen the game and refuse to use seek or fast forward. (I don't know why I came out of lurking for something minor like this, but I did.)
"I think happiness is just being able to loaf without stress." http://speeddemosarchive.com/
Former player
Joined: 3/23/2006
Posts: 211
submission message wrote:
Furthermore, so far, nobody in the world has been able to write a computer program that plays Go better than an average club player.
"Mogo has an estimated 3-4 dan strength in 9x9 games." says Wikipedia I think 3-4 dan is better than an average club player, and this tas was played on a 9x9 board...
do not forget to *ENJOY THE SAUCE*
Editor, Active player (297)
Joined: 3/8/2004
Posts: 7469
Location: Arzareth
Huffers wrote:
"Mogo has an estimated 3-4 dan strength in 9x9 games." I think 3-4 dan is better than an average club player, and this tas was played on a 9x9 board...
Ok, you're right; my saying only applied to 19x19 and 9x9 bots are somewhat stronger relatively. Many players only consider 19x19 as real Go :)
Banned User
Joined: 3/10/2004
Posts: 7698
Location: Finland
Enhasa wrote:
I agree with you that RPG TASes in general are very boring
I didn't say RPG TASes are boring, and I don't find them boring. I just said that people often say they are.
Banned User
Joined: 12/23/2004
Posts: 1850
Warp wrote:
I didn't say RPG TASes are boring, and I don't find them boring. I just said that people often say they are.
Curiously, the same things are said about the various RPG games (slow, boring, have to turbo through most of the game, only people who have played the game can appreciate it...)
Slow, boring, repitive and annoying music, stupid CPU. Nothing suprising or exciting.
Well, you get two of them, but miss the rest. RPGs usually have some form of interesting things in them; incredible luck manipulation, silly sequence breaking, good music, appealing graphics, lots of areas, etc. With this you basically watch a bunch of circles on a screen that never changes. I find your inability to notice these things amusing.
Perma-banned
Banned User
Joined: 3/10/2004
Posts: 7698
Location: Finland
To me go is very interesting. You might not understand it if you don't play the game.
Experienced player (829)
Joined: 11/18/2006
Posts: 2426
Location: Back where I belong
This is as good a place as any to ask: is the game of Go identical to Othello, and if there are differences, what are they?
Living Well Is The Best Revenge My Personal Page
Banned User
Joined: 12/23/2004
Posts: 1850
Warp wrote:
To me go is very interesting. You might not understand it if you don't play the game.
I have played the game, but that doesn't make this submission any less boring.
Perma-banned
Former player
Joined: 3/30/2004
Posts: 1354
Location: Heather's imagination
mmbossman wrote:
This is as good a place as any to ask: is the game of Go identical to Othello, and if there are differences, what are they?
They're very different. In Othello, you must capture with every move, and capturing replaces an opponent's stones with your own. Capturing also happens only along a line, ie only two stones are needed to capture. In Go, you must entirely surround a group of stones to capture it, and captured stones are removed from the board entirely. You are not restricted in where you play your stones in any way. Othello is usually played on an 8x8 board, Go is usually played on a 19x19 board.
someone is out there who will like you. take off your mask so they can find you faster. I support the new Nekketsu Kouha Kunio-kun.
Editor, Active player (297)
Joined: 3/8/2004
Posts: 7469
Location: Arzareth
Boco wrote:
In Othello, you must capture with every move, and capturing replaces an opponent's stones with your own. Capturing also happens only along a line, ie only two stones are needed to capture. In Go, you must entirely surround a group of stones to capture it, and captured stones are removed from the board entirely. You are not restricted in where you play your stones in any way. Othello is usually played on an 8x8 board, Go is usually played on a 19x19 board.
Also, capturing is not the primary goal in Go. A game may well progress to the end without a single capture taking place.
Editor, Active player (297)
Joined: 3/8/2004
Posts: 7469
Location: Arzareth
Xkeeper wrote:
I have played the game, but that doesn't make this submission any less boring.
Though you have played about ten games in total. That's less than the proverbial fifty games one must lose quickly, and not enough to begin to appreciate the game's complexity :)
Banned User
Joined: 12/23/2004
Posts: 1850
Bisqwit wrote:
Xkeeper wrote:
I have played the game, but that doesn't make this submission any less boring.
Though you have played about ten games in total. That's less than the proverbial fifty games one must lose quickly, and not enough to begin to appreciate the game's complexity :)
True, but I have also watched many games (which I usually find more interesting than playing it). I suppose there is just more excitement in seeing two actual players fight as opposed to one player who has infinite retries and one stupid computer. Shrug.
Perma-banned
Banned User
Joined: 3/10/2004
Posts: 7698
Location: Finland
Bisqwit wrote:
Also, capturing is not the primary goal in Go. A game may well progress to the end without a single capture taking place.
Yes, capturing is a very secondary goal. In a typical (full-board) game one player gets about 50-100 points (assuming the game is approximately even). From these points typically about 5-10 come from captured stones. As you say, in some cases a game might end without even one single capture. Capturing it's not all that important. (In some games, where there are a *lot* of captured stones, they still usually don't matter that much because it's both players who capture stones alternatively, so they cancel out.) Some games may end abruptly (ie. in resignation) when one player loses a huge amount of stones with nothing in return, but this is rare, especially with strong players (who know how to defend). By far the most usual cause for resignation is that you are very far behind in territory. Ironically, capturing rules are usually the very first rules a beginner is taught. This usually gives at first a wrong impression about what the game is all about. I have more than once even seen people teaching a beginner the basic rules of the game *without* ever explaining about territory at all! The beginner might start playing games without even hearing a single word about territory and the role it plays in the game. I would say that the *threat* of capturing plays a more important role than capturing itself (although this isn't the main point of the game either, but it's probably more relevant than the capturing all by itself). Sometimes threatening to capture a group of stones is not done to actually capture it (at least not if the other player defends correctly) but to achieve other goals (such as getting influence or forcing the opponent to make slow moves). In some cases this plays a crucial role in the game. For example there are some marvelous professional games where one player invades the opponent's potential territory, and the other player tries to kill those invading stones. But this is also not very usual either (although more usual in beginner games). The most crucial thing in go is strategy: The balance between potential territory and outwards influence. You can't win by securing territory only (at least not if the players are mid-level or stronger). You have to find the correct balance between securing territory (or at least making potential territory) and creating outwards influence. If you create a potential territory which is too loose, it will be invaded or heavily reduced. If you make the potential territory too tight, it will be too small (because your opponent will make a larger one). Influence helps you both expanding your territory in the future and potentially attacking or reducing your opponent territory. This is very complicated.
TASVideosGrue
They/Them
Joined: 10/1/2008
Posts: 2791
Location: The dark corners of the TASVideos server
om, nom, nom... blech, stale!
Editor, Active player (297)
Joined: 3/8/2004
Posts: 7469
Location: Arzareth
Added youtube encode. Link to video ...with captions.
Site Admin, Skilled player (1255)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11492
Location: Lake Char­gogg­a­gogg­man­chaugg­a­gogg­chau­bun­a­gung­a­maugg
Bisqwit: Resurrect this thing please!
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.