Joined: 11/1/2007
Posts: 100
Skilled player (1410)
Joined: 5/31/2004
Posts: 1821
Joined: 7/28/2005
Posts: 339
*Kles waits to be pelted for the arbitrary names he chose
Player (89)
Joined: 11/14/2005
Posts: 1058
Location: United States
yay! I'm a 10!
They're off to find the hero of the day...
Former player
Joined: 1/17/2006
Posts: 775
Location: Deign
Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign aqfaq Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign
Editor, Experienced player (734)
Joined: 6/13/2006
Posts: 3300
Location: Massachussetts, USA
yay! I'm in both graphs! :-D jimsfriend, don't you have the post/day ratio graph? I think that one makes more sense...
Homepage ☣ Retired
Editor, Active player (297)
Joined: 3/8/2004
Posts: 7469
Location: Arzareth
jimsfriend wrote:
###M.html pages vs Comicalflop's post count
That was interesting. I don't know how that graph was created though. Here's mine. Rather off-topic in this thread, though… It is interesting to note how the rate of movie publications has stayed the almost same at all times. Also, everyone's total post count, as requested by Tub: PS: If you know your own user-id, you can get your personal statistics (as well as compare with someone else) from this generator with little intelligence.
Tub
Joined: 6/25/2005
Posts: 1377
so there's a pretty constant post rate as well. Looks like neither death nor world domination are on our way. thanks!
m00
Skilled player (1827)
Joined: 4/20/2005
Posts: 2161
Location: Norrköping, Sweden
What happened around September 2006? It looks like # published movies go from 600 to 700 in just a day. And what's up with January-July 2004? There are two different red lines around that area, and overall, the graph looks really weird there...
Former player
Joined: 11/13/2005
Posts: 1587
I think September 2006 was the time when Bisqwit republished those antique movies.
Editor, Active player (297)
Joined: 3/8/2004
Posts: 7469
Location: Arzareth
Randil wrote:
What happened around September 2006? It looks like # published movies go from 600 to 700 in just a day.
History revival project. I inserted ≥85 movies into the database. Those movies were old movies that were published at Nesvideos, and later obsoleted, before the creation of the Wiki-based engine that kept old entries still accessible.
Randil wrote:
And what's up with January-July 2004?
Those were the said historical movies that were inserted. They were inserted in September 2006 and got numbers in the 600…700 range, but originally published in January-July 2004. Re: weirdness, the low-end numbers look kind of fuzzy because back then, the movies were not numbered (or rather, ordered) by their publication date, but by an arbitrary order. So movie #1 was published later than movie #2, for example. Only after they were imported to the new site engine, successive publications got successive numbers, save for the history revival movies.
Editor, Expert player (2478)
Joined: 4/8/2005
Posts: 1573
Location: Gone for a year, just for varietyyyyyyyyy!!
Wow! It seems that I wrote Bag's early posts! Cool!
Editor, Active player (297)
Joined: 3/8/2004
Posts: 7469
Location: Arzareth
Aqfaq wrote:
Wow! It seems that I wrote Bag's early posts! Cool!
Thanks for the bugreport. It has been fixed now. PS: DO NOT ROBOT the generator or iterate it through a set of numbers. It consumes several seconds of CPU time per uncached request, increasing the database load and making the site slower.
Editor, Experienced player (734)
Joined: 6/13/2006
Posts: 3300
Location: Massachussetts, USA
Remember the last time you created a new forum feature that people could exploit and warned people not to abuse but they did anyway?
Homepage ☣ Retired
JXQ
Experienced player (761)
Joined: 5/6/2005
Posts: 3132
Comicalflop, have more faith in the users. I don't think anyone will abuse such a feature to make pointless, silly graphs. On a completely unrelated™,
<Swordless> Go hug a tree, you vegetarian (I bet you really are one)
Joined: 8/7/2006
Posts: 344
JXQ wrote:
Comicalflop, have more faith in the users. I don't think anyone will abuse such a feature to make pointless, silly graphs. On a completely unrelated™,
This is the best graph ever. You sir, win an internet.
Experienced player (828)
Joined: 11/18/2006
Posts: 2426
Location: Back where I belong
I concur. A gold internet. However, if they keep posting (and God knows of course 3 and 4 will), can integrity become a negative value?
Living Well Is The Best Revenge My Personal Page
Editor, Active player (297)
Joined: 3/8/2004
Posts: 7469
Location: Arzareth
JXQ wrote:
We can play this two ways. Reading your graph, I'd say that the red line is inversely proportional to your post counter.(!) Observe also that the moment when your posting rate decreased in ~may 2007, conincides precisely with the moment when the "integrity" stopped descending.¡ Also, re: faith in the users, my concern was mainly with the server load, nothing moderation-related this time. ¡) sarcasm mark
Joined: 8/7/2006
Posts: 344
mmbossman wrote:
I concur. A gold internet. However, if they keep posting (and God knows of course 3 and 4 will), can integrity become a negative value?
I refer you to NeoGAF for evidence that yes, integrity can go below zero.
Former player
Joined: 1/17/2006
Posts: 775
Location: Deign
Bisqwit wrote:
jimsfriend wrote:
###M.html pages vs Comicalflop's post count
That was interesting. I don't know how that graph was created though. Here's mine. Rather off-topic in this thread, though…
It goes something like this. You compare the date a movie was published, I used the date here: with the date a post was posted. Find how many posts are older than the movie and put it in a spreadsheet. Then in the address bar increment ### by 1 until a movie with a more recent date is found, and then count more posts etc. Stop when ### is 1000.
Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign aqfaq Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign
Editor, Active player (297)
Joined: 3/8/2004
Posts: 7469
Location: Arzareth
jimsfriend wrote:
It goes something like this. <explanations> Then in the address bar increment ### by 1 until a movie with a more recent date is found, and then count more posts etc. Stop when ### is 1000.
I know you can do it like that. I just didn't think anyone would/could be bothered to do that kind of laboursome work manually. Guess I was mistaken. EDIT: Especially when there's something like http://tasvideos.org/SiteTechnology/API.html in the existence.
JXQ
Experienced player (761)
Joined: 5/6/2005
Posts: 3132
Bisqwit wrote:
I just didn't think anyone would/could be bothered to do that kind of laboursome work manually. Guess I was mistaken.
Never underestimate the ability of a TASer to work on tedious tasks :)
<Swordless> Go hug a tree, you vegetarian (I bet you really are one)
Banned User
Joined: 12/23/2004
Posts: 1850
JXQ wrote:
Comicalflop, have more faith in the users. I don't think anyone will abuse such a feature to make pointless, silly graphs. On a completely unrelated™,
I love this. There is nothing more that needs said.
Perma-banned
Former player
Joined: 1/17/2006
Posts: 775
Location: Deign
Bisqwit wrote:
EDIT: Especially when there's something like http://tasvideos.org/SiteTechnology/API.html in the existence.
Here are a few reasons why I did not use that: 1. I did not know that page existed. <-- This is a pretty important reason 2. As far as I know I don't have a user key. I'd rather just do it by hand than send you a pm and wait a week for a reply. 3. I don't know any programming language.
Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign aqfaq Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign Deign
Joined: 8/13/2005
Posts: 356
Location: Canada
JXQ wrote:
Comicalflop, have more faith in the users. I don't think anyone will abuse such a feature to make pointless, silly graphs. On a completely unrelated™,
It looks to me like Chamale has had a very slight positive effect on the rate of integrity decline. Intentional?