I'm sorry, but this game is nigh impossible for me to watch - it's simply too slow-paced. There's absolutely no way I can think of for anyone to enjoy a run of this game. You also make obvious technical mistakes such as missing coins during the first level, and don't, say, hit enemies as soon as possible (if I remember correctly, you don't some enemies at all) in the second or use as few eggs as possible (you admit all of these points in the submission text, for that matter). In fact, some digging suggests that your score of 693 is beaten unassisted (at least one location reports a score of 711, though there doesn't seem to be a way at first glance to confirm this). Kill it with fire.

basically everything that sgrunt said

om, nom, nom

one location reports a score of 711, though there doesn't seem to be a way at first glance to confirm this).

Well, here's a new tool-assisted record by WaddleDX: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ToZsIhTXJu4 I'm not sure that it is publishable, but it definitely proves a point.

one location reports a score of 711, though there doesn't seem to be a way at first glance to confirm this).

Well, here's a new tool-assisted record by WaddleDX: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ToZsIhTXJu4 I'm not sure that it is publishable, but it definitely proves a point.

...GEEZUS. That...was...AWESOME!! Now if that was submitted, I would so vote for a yes on that. That was quite entertaining.

one location reports a score of 711, though there doesn't seem to be a way at first glance to confirm this).

Well, here's a new tool-assisted record by WaddleDX: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ToZsIhTXJu4 I'm not sure that it is publishable, but it definitely proves a point.

Thanks for linking to that and proving my point. Although the second part of that run is impressive, one needs to sit through the hideously slow first part in order to get there. I'd probably vote Meh on this if it were submitted.