This is the second speed fighter TAS that has been incorrectly placed to Moons. The last time this happened from what I recall was on Tekken 3.
...a movie that recieved postive votes and not very many negative votes IN THE SUBMISSION THREAD is not what I’d consider “incorrectly placed into moons”.
[14:15] <feos> WinDOES what DOSn't
12:33:44 PM <Mothrayas> "I got an oof with my game!"
Mothrayas Today at 12:22: <Colin> thank you for supporting noble causes such as my feet
MemoryTAS Today at 11:55 AM: you wouldn't know beauty if it slapped you in the face with a giant fish
[Today at 4:51 PM] Mothrayas: although if you like your own tweets that's the online equivalent of sniffing your own farts and probably tells a lot about you as a person
MemoryTAS Today at 7:01 PM: But I exert big staff energy honestly lol
Samsara Today at 1:20 PM: wouldn't ACE in a real life TAS just stand for Actually Cease Existing
Joined: 10/12/2011
Posts: 6449
Location: The land down under.
Yes. Let's look at the submission thread.
Oh would you look at that. It's 3 Yes Votes to 1 No Vote.
75% in favour not bad for comments.
Anyways. Try and validate your point clearer since the ratings on the Movie paints a completely different picture to the votes on the Submission poll (the word you're look for).
WebNations/Sabih wrote:
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
Disables Comments and Ratings for the YouTube account.Something better for yourself and also others.
You said this was incorrectly placed into moons because the ratings show 3.9 for entertainment, however you are forgetting that those ratings did not come out until AFTER the movie got accepted and published to moons. So the publication ratings are irrelevant when you’re claiming that the judge incorrectly accepted it to moons.
You can say it doesn’t deserve moons now because of the ratings on the publication, bur to say it was incorrectly accepted to moons is just flat out false.
[14:15] <feos> WinDOES what DOSn't
12:33:44 PM <Mothrayas> "I got an oof with my game!"
Mothrayas Today at 12:22: <Colin> thank you for supporting noble causes such as my feet
MemoryTAS Today at 11:55 AM: you wouldn't know beauty if it slapped you in the face with a giant fish
[Today at 4:51 PM] Mothrayas: although if you like your own tweets that's the online equivalent of sniffing your own farts and probably tells a lot about you as a person
MemoryTAS Today at 7:01 PM: But I exert big staff energy honestly lol
Samsara Today at 1:20 PM: wouldn't ACE in a real life TAS just stand for Actually Cease Existing
So the publication ratings are irrelevant when you’re claiming that the judge incorrectly accepted it to moons.
Wrong.
EZGames69, it's the judge's job to predict the ratings and judge accordingly. The poll results are not ratings. The simplicity of the poll results makes them only a tool to estimate the final feedback.
Saying "the decision is correct until people rated the movie" is wrong.
The statement "the judge had no way of knowing what the rating would be" is the reason we even have judges.
Warning: Might glitch to creditsI will finish this ACE soon as possible
(or will I?)
So the publication ratings are irrelevant when you’re claiming that the judge incorrectly accepted it to moons.
Wrong.
Can you provide a source to this? Because I dont see anywhere in here that says they have to predict the publication ratings.
I do see this:
Factor in the submission votes. The Moons tier can only be used if the feedback is positive by a strong majority. Nach and adelikat suggest that 80% yes votes is generally a strong majority.
the feedback in the submission poll was fairly positive, 11 yes vote compared to 2 no votes, which is 84% approval.
In my eyes, this is a case where the submission got more positive ratings, but not the publication ratings, which even you know isn’t an abnormal thing to happen.
[14:15] <feos> WinDOES what DOSn't
12:33:44 PM <Mothrayas> "I got an oof with my game!"
Mothrayas Today at 12:22: <Colin> thank you for supporting noble causes such as my feet
MemoryTAS Today at 11:55 AM: you wouldn't know beauty if it slapped you in the face with a giant fish
[Today at 4:51 PM] Mothrayas: although if you like your own tweets that's the online equivalent of sniffing your own farts and probably tells a lot about you as a person
MemoryTAS Today at 7:01 PM: But I exert big staff energy honestly lol
Samsara Today at 1:20 PM: wouldn't ACE in a real life TAS just stand for Actually Cease Existing
Can you provide a source to this? Because I dont see anywhere in here that says they have to predict the publication ratings.
Read again. It says "determine what the overall feedback is".
The ratings exist to represent the overall feedback.
The feedback provided during the judgement was all positive, with the accetion of one person with negative feedback. What other way is there for a judge to determine that publication ratings would be poor?
[14:15] <feos> WinDOES what DOSn't
12:33:44 PM <Mothrayas> "I got an oof with my game!"
Mothrayas Today at 12:22: <Colin> thank you for supporting noble causes such as my feet
MemoryTAS Today at 11:55 AM: you wouldn't know beauty if it slapped you in the face with a giant fish
[Today at 4:51 PM] Mothrayas: although if you like your own tweets that's the online equivalent of sniffing your own farts and probably tells a lot about you as a person
MemoryTAS Today at 7:01 PM: But I exert big staff energy honestly lol
Samsara Today at 1:20 PM: wouldn't ACE in a real life TAS just stand for Actually Cease Existing
It's fun to see the last opponent committing suicide, and the reception was almost completely positive.
Accepting for Moons.
Seems like the judge DID do that.
[14:15] <feos> WinDOES what DOSn't
12:33:44 PM <Mothrayas> "I got an oof with my game!"
Mothrayas Today at 12:22: <Colin> thank you for supporting noble causes such as my feet
MemoryTAS Today at 11:55 AM: you wouldn't know beauty if it slapped you in the face with a giant fish
[Today at 4:51 PM] Mothrayas: although if you like your own tweets that's the online equivalent of sniffing your own farts and probably tells a lot about you as a person
MemoryTAS Today at 7:01 PM: But I exert big staff energy honestly lol
Samsara Today at 1:20 PM: wouldn't ACE in a real life TAS just stand for Actually Cease Existing
[14:15] <feos> WinDOES what DOSn't
12:33:44 PM <Mothrayas> "I got an oof with my game!"
Mothrayas Today at 12:22: <Colin> thank you for supporting noble causes such as my feet
MemoryTAS Today at 11:55 AM: you wouldn't know beauty if it slapped you in the face with a giant fish
[Today at 4:51 PM] Mothrayas: although if you like your own tweets that's the online equivalent of sniffing your own farts and probably tells a lot about you as a person
MemoryTAS Today at 7:01 PM: But I exert big staff energy honestly lol
Samsara Today at 1:20 PM: wouldn't ACE in a real life TAS just stand for Actually Cease Existing
Please see what that was in response to.
Spike is saying that the ratings on the publication is the reason why the movie was incorrectly accepted to moons instead of vault. However I said it was irrelevant because those ratings did not come until after it was published, and the only method of seeing how well received the movie was, was the submission thread AND the polling, which have been mostly positive. The judge watched the run, enjoyed it, and saw that others have enjoyed it so it was accepted into moons. There is no indication that it was a borderline case since there wasn’t more negative votes.
Now I do think that because of what the publication ratings have right now, sitting at 3.8 for entertainment, then yes, moving it to vault makes sense now that we have more examples of feedback being negative, but my point wasn’t that it should stay in moons, it was that with the information we had prior to the movie being accepted, there were more positive votes than negative ones, so the judge did not incorrectly accepted it to moons like Spikestuff is saying.
This is the last that I am going to talk about this.
[14:15] <feos> WinDOES what DOSn't
12:33:44 PM <Mothrayas> "I got an oof with my game!"
Mothrayas Today at 12:22: <Colin> thank you for supporting noble causes such as my feet
MemoryTAS Today at 11:55 AM: you wouldn't know beauty if it slapped you in the face with a giant fish
[Today at 4:51 PM] Mothrayas: although if you like your own tweets that's the online equivalent of sniffing your own farts and probably tells a lot about you as a person
MemoryTAS Today at 7:01 PM: But I exert big staff energy honestly lol
Samsara Today at 1:20 PM: wouldn't ACE in a real life TAS just stand for Actually Cease Existing
