Are you going to respond to the accusations of plagiarism that took place in your last submission?

I am confused as to what youre talkin about

I am confused as to what youre talkin about

Are you? Also to bleed that comment I'm linking into this one. Guess whose 1-1's input this belongs to. I'll let the Mario experts go through this with their comments, since they always know a ton more about the game about optimality and whatnot, but that author credit is missing again.

If you copy an author’s inputs and put it into your movie, especially when it is a major amount of inputs, you should always include the original author in the author list, a description mention isnt going to cut it.

If you copy an author’s inputs and put it into your movie, especially when it is a major amount of inputs, you should always include the original author in the author list, a description mention isnt going to cut it.

Its one level, not that big of a chunk, i said i used his tas, i really dont see any issue.

I took it upon myself to watch that SMB2J submission. Here is my feedback: For all levels, I noticed that he did not correctly implement the subspeed manipulation to save half of a pixel at the start of every level. I did not check for whether he manipulated subspeed to shorten the walk to the castle by a frame. 1-1: Optimization looks fine, but it was copied from HappyLee's TAS. 1-2: The beginning of the level was copied from HappyLee's TAS. I did not notice any optimization issues here. 1-3: A framerule can be saved here with better optimization on the mushroom grab. 1-4: Fast acceleration at the start of the level is suboptimal; unoptimized fire flower grab; suboptimal movement around first firebar; suboptimal movement around pillars; still has minor slowdowns during Bowser fight that needs to be corrected. The left-right movement for extended durations may have cost a couple of frames or even a framerule starting here because it slows Mario down to 39.5 subpixels per frame. If I see it, I will refer to it as L+R. 2-1: There is a slowdown at frame ~10060 that is unnecessary; L+R. 2-2: There is a lag frame at the ~12660 frame mark that can be avoided. The wall jump is suboptimal. 2-3: I'm not sure if you can spawn a late cheep-cheep here to glitch through the floor, but if it can be done, it would save seconds; L+R. 2-4: Fast acceleration at the start of the level is suboptimal; duck jump to the platform with the koopa is suboptimal; did not use the ground left+right acceleration after performing the clip; unnecessary slowdown after exiting the wall; L+R; still has minor slowdowns during Bowser fight that needs to be corrected. Based on what I've found here, I wouldn't be surprised if you could cut off 1.5 to two seconds in the first two Worlds alone. 3-1: There is a slowdown around the ~18900 frame mark that was unnecessary. 3-2: No fast acceleration at the start of the level. That clip around frame 21,700 does not save time. 3-3: Always use flagpole glitch; L+R. 3-4: There was an unnecessary slowdown around frame 25,930; suboptimal movement through the one block gaps; L+R; still has minor slowdowns during Bowser fight that needs to be corrected. 4-1: There is an unnecessary slowdown around frame 29,080. 4-2: Nothing pops straight out at me in this level. There are a few micro optimizations that I would have if I made my own TAS, but they wouldn't save time. 4-3: Nothing pops straight out at me in this level. There are a few micro optimizations that I would have if I made my own TAS, but they wouldn't save time. 4-4: Fast acceleration at the start of the level is suboptimal; there is no fast acceleration after clipping into the wall; the Bowser fight was clearly suboptimal and can be done without slowing down. I've seen enough.