Posts for Noxxa


Noxxa
They/Them
Experienced Forum User, Moderator, Published Author, Expert player (4142)
Joined: 8/14/2009
Posts: 4083
Location: The Netherlands
I'm a bit on the fence about it - as I said, I find the "ending point" somewhat dubious, but it seems a fair amount of people agree it's a valid ending point. If enough people agree about the ending point, I suppose it can be put back to Vault without branch name.
http://www.youtube.com/Noxxa <dwangoAC> This is a TAS (...). Not suitable for all audiences. May cause undesirable side-effects. May contain emulator abuse. Emulator may be abusive. This product contains glitches known to the state of California to cause egg defects. <Masterjun> I'm just a guy arranging bits in a sequence which could potentially amuse other people looking at these bits <adelikat> In Oregon Trail, I sacrificed my own family to save time. In Star trek, I killed helpless comrades in escape pods to save time. Here, I kill my allies to save time. I think I need help.
Noxxa
They/Them
Experienced Forum User, Moderator, Published Author, Expert player (4142)
Joined: 8/14/2009
Posts: 4083
Location: The Netherlands
feos wrote:
And the branch is put only for the sake of information. Probably it's not needed, but I don't see a problem with having it.
This is the problem I see with it:
I wrote:
it's still wrong to publish it with a non-vault branch name. At best, it's misleading about what branches are accepted in Vault and what not.
I wrote:
Those labels indeed describe the movie, but it's clear that their goal is still to get to the completion point in the fastest time. In this case, it isn't so clear, as "fastest maximum score" is a different goal than "fastest time", and is not a vaultable goal unlike the latter.
http://www.youtube.com/Noxxa <dwangoAC> This is a TAS (...). Not suitable for all audiences. May cause undesirable side-effects. May contain emulator abuse. Emulator may be abusive. This product contains glitches known to the state of California to cause egg defects. <Masterjun> I'm just a guy arranging bits in a sequence which could potentially amuse other people looking at these bits <adelikat> In Oregon Trail, I sacrificed my own family to save time. In Star trek, I killed helpless comrades in escape pods to save time. Here, I kill my allies to save time. I think I need help.
Noxxa
They/Them
Experienced Forum User, Moderator, Published Author, Expert player (4142)
Joined: 8/14/2009
Posts: 4083
Location: The Netherlands
feos wrote:
"Seems like" isn't an argument. If there's a closer completion point, it must obsolete that run. If not, this one is the fastest, hence vaultable.
I'm not arguing that there is a closer completion point. I'm arguing that it doesn't appear like there is any.
feos wrote:
We don't have a vault branch name, neither do we have a non-vault one, since "fastest possible" is not marked by having no branch
Vault branch names certainly exist, such as "100% completion", a completely vaultable goal, or such as the examples you list below. Contradiction? And we very definitely have non-vault branch names, such as...just about any run with a branch that has goals that disqualify it for vault.
feos wrote:
I can't search through the Vault movies, since the page is broken, but there definitely are runs with labels that indicate that the run does something specific, like "first enemy wave", or something of that fashion. Those runs have labels just to tell that it's not a traditional completion that would work for other games. Anyways, "game end/warp glitch" runs are still vaultable, despite of having a branch.
Those labels indeed describe the movie, but it's clear that their goal is still to get to the completion point in the fastest time. In this case, it isn't so clear, as "fastest maximum score" is a different goal than "fastest time", and is not a vaultable goal unlike the latter.
feos wrote:
Mothrayas wrote:
Vault accepts fastest runs of alternate game modes.
Wiki: Vault wrote:
for games with separate, independent level sets (modes, episodes) officially available from start, each level set can have its TAS in Vault.
In BB2, the Slash mode is unlockable from the start.
That qualification was only added months after BB2 et al. were already published. I also don't agree about it necessarily having to be available from the start, but that's for another discussion topic.
http://www.youtube.com/Noxxa <dwangoAC> This is a TAS (...). Not suitable for all audiences. May cause undesirable side-effects. May contain emulator abuse. Emulator may be abusive. This product contains glitches known to the state of California to cause egg defects. <Masterjun> I'm just a guy arranging bits in a sequence which could potentially amuse other people looking at these bits <adelikat> In Oregon Trail, I sacrificed my own family to save time. In Star trek, I killed helpless comrades in escape pods to save time. Here, I kill my allies to save time. I think I need help.
Noxxa
They/Them
Experienced Forum User, Moderator, Published Author, Expert player (4142)
Joined: 8/14/2009
Posts: 4083
Location: The Netherlands
feos wrote:
Why was it mooned even before my reply?
If administration sees an error, it has to be corrected immediately. I discussed it with adelikat and Nach on IRC before changing it, but you weren't there so I couldn't get an immediate reply from you.
feos wrote:
This is Vault, because fastest maximum score is the only certain ending point for this game. The submissions tells it well.
I find it somewhat dubious. The little "copyright" blurb seems more like an easter egg if anything, and the game itself doesn't look like it ends. Either way, even if this would be considered a vaultable ending, it's still wrong to publish it with a non-vault branch name. At best, it's misleading about what branches are accepted in Vault and what not.
feos wrote:
Also, #3966: Spikestuff's PSX Bishi Bashi Special "Time Trial, maximum score" in 05:13.50
FractalFusion, senior judge at the time, wrote:
If this is the fastest possible completion of the game (hardest difficulty and in-game time considered), then I think it can go into Vault.
Also, if I recall correctly, the whole "aims for maximum score" thing in that case didn't impact time.
feos wrote:
Vault doesn't care of time trial or any other goal. As long as it's the fastest, and not a newgame+ kind of run, it's vault eligible. However, #2621: Dammit's PSX Bushido Blade 2 "Slash Mode" in 04:20.23.
Vault accepts fastest runs of alternate game modes. This precedent was set when FractalFusion judged #2984: sparky's PSX Ehrgeiz - God Bless the Ring "Quest Mode, Hard" in 03:51.77, which is also why Bushido Blade 2 was accepted.
http://www.youtube.com/Noxxa <dwangoAC> This is a TAS (...). Not suitable for all audiences. May cause undesirable side-effects. May contain emulator abuse. Emulator may be abusive. This product contains glitches known to the state of California to cause egg defects. <Masterjun> I'm just a guy arranging bits in a sequence which could potentially amuse other people looking at these bits <adelikat> In Oregon Trail, I sacrificed my own family to save time. In Star trek, I killed helpless comrades in escape pods to save time. Here, I kill my allies to save time. I think I need help.
Post subject: Re: #4310: scahfy's A2600 Seaquest "fastest 999999" in 01:39.8
Noxxa
They/Them
Experienced Forum User, Moderator, Published Author, Expert player (4142)
Joined: 8/14/2009
Posts: 4083
Location: The Netherlands
It appears the judge forgot that "maximum score" or similar is not a vaultable category. As we don't do unpublications on this site, this run has instead been 'corrected' to Moons. Just putting this here for clarification.
http://www.youtube.com/Noxxa <dwangoAC> This is a TAS (...). Not suitable for all audiences. May cause undesirable side-effects. May contain emulator abuse. Emulator may be abusive. This product contains glitches known to the state of California to cause egg defects. <Masterjun> I'm just a guy arranging bits in a sequence which could potentially amuse other people looking at these bits <adelikat> In Oregon Trail, I sacrificed my own family to save time. In Star trek, I killed helpless comrades in escape pods to save time. Here, I kill my allies to save time. I think I need help.
Noxxa
They/Them
Experienced Forum User, Moderator, Published Author, Expert player (4142)
Joined: 8/14/2009
Posts: 4083
Location: The Netherlands
Spikestuff wrote:
Would this TAS be considered as that "special" case. Since it went from Moon to Vault as it was originally intended to go after it was published? It was a TAS when accepted 68% on YES votes and it was stated by others that it should Vault then somehow Mooned then put to Vault later.
That case was more of an error in my mind - it should never have been put to Moons in the first place.
Spikestuff wrote:
So, in near future we would see Yes votes for these "game end glitches" but overall it may actually end up in the Vault.
When I judge which tier to put a run in, I don't necessarily look at the vote percentages, but rather, anticipate how its entertainment rating will pan out. Had I judged Tekken 3, I would have put it in the Vault regardless of the 68% yes votes because I knew in advance its entertainment rating would end up below average regardless of the votes. (So far, for runs I have judged and applied this methodology to, it hasn't failed me yet.) However, "game end glitch" runs are fairly new, and I don't have a good enough grasp to anticipate how the entertainment rating for these runs would end up. (Some of these runs' ratings have surprised me.) I don't think the other judges can at this point in time fully predict how the ratings pan out either. However, as for now, Moons generally seems a safer bet, as it is supported by the vote counts (which are extremely high compared to the actual entertainment ratings), and entertainment feedback, while between mediocre and okay-ish, is not outright terrible. Of course, the other judges have their own ideas and methodologies on this matter. Most of these runs were judged by feos and Nach, and each have their own ideas as to what constitutes publishing to moon tier and what not.
http://www.youtube.com/Noxxa <dwangoAC> This is a TAS (...). Not suitable for all audiences. May cause undesirable side-effects. May contain emulator abuse. Emulator may be abusive. This product contains glitches known to the state of California to cause egg defects. <Masterjun> I'm just a guy arranging bits in a sequence which could potentially amuse other people looking at these bits <adelikat> In Oregon Trail, I sacrificed my own family to save time. In Star trek, I killed helpless comrades in escape pods to save time. Here, I kill my allies to save time. I think I need help.
Noxxa
They/Them
Experienced Forum User, Moderator, Published Author, Expert player (4142)
Joined: 8/14/2009
Posts: 4083
Location: The Netherlands
Spikestuff wrote:
Also considering everyone's vote so far 5.4 Avg on Entertainment makes it a vault score, but the overall average keeps it out of vault.
Overall average doesn't matter for vault/moon tier. Only the entertainment rate matters. Anyway, these kind of runs will continue to go to moon tier as long as the majority of people finds them (apparently) entertaining. Personally I agree that the novelty has run off and they are just simply boring to watch now, but it seems for a lot of people that's not (yet) the case.
http://www.youtube.com/Noxxa <dwangoAC> This is a TAS (...). Not suitable for all audiences. May cause undesirable side-effects. May contain emulator abuse. Emulator may be abusive. This product contains glitches known to the state of California to cause egg defects. <Masterjun> I'm just a guy arranging bits in a sequence which could potentially amuse other people looking at these bits <adelikat> In Oregon Trail, I sacrificed my own family to save time. In Star trek, I killed helpless comrades in escape pods to save time. Here, I kill my allies to save time. I think I need help.
Noxxa
They/Them
Experienced Forum User, Moderator, Published Author, Expert player (4142)
Joined: 8/14/2009
Posts: 4083
Location: The Netherlands
No, that's Final Fantasy on the WonderSwan (Color).
http://www.youtube.com/Noxxa <dwangoAC> This is a TAS (...). Not suitable for all audiences. May cause undesirable side-effects. May contain emulator abuse. Emulator may be abusive. This product contains glitches known to the state of California to cause egg defects. <Masterjun> I'm just a guy arranging bits in a sequence which could potentially amuse other people looking at these bits <adelikat> In Oregon Trail, I sacrificed my own family to save time. In Star trek, I killed helpless comrades in escape pods to save time. Here, I kill my allies to save time. I think I need help.
Noxxa
They/Them
Experienced Forum User, Moderator, Published Author, Expert player (4142)
Joined: 8/14/2009
Posts: 4083
Location: The Netherlands
That happens because it tries to display too many movies at once. (All moon-tier movies on the site is a pretty long list.) If it's going to be fixed, it's probably going to happen when the movie module would be overhauled entirely, And it'll probably still take quite a while before that happens.
http://www.youtube.com/Noxxa <dwangoAC> This is a TAS (...). Not suitable for all audiences. May cause undesirable side-effects. May contain emulator abuse. Emulator may be abusive. This product contains glitches known to the state of California to cause egg defects. <Masterjun> I'm just a guy arranging bits in a sequence which could potentially amuse other people looking at these bits <adelikat> In Oregon Trail, I sacrificed my own family to save time. In Star trek, I killed helpless comrades in escape pods to save time. Here, I kill my allies to save time. I think I need help.
Noxxa
They/Them
Experienced Forum User, Moderator, Published Author, Expert player (4142)
Joined: 8/14/2009
Posts: 4083
Location: The Netherlands
Espyo wrote:
Hmm, I see that. Though I still think it's a tradeoff -- you're trading speed for entertainment. That's what "tradeoff" means, unless I'm wrong.
You're not trading speed for entertainment. Adding an additional press adds both speed and entertainment*. The tradeoff in this case is neither speed nor entertainment; it's the run's goal that's being traded off. *Entertainment here being based on how the run gets more boring if it's hours longer, so entertainment is directly correlated to speed in this case.
Espyo wrote:
But yeah, something as arbitrary as "minimum A presses except when it's too long"-run would be stupid. I guess we just wait for faster methods... But hey, what about skipping the longer stars altogether? That's still in the table, no?
How would that work? "Minimum A presses for maximum amount of stars except skip it when it's too long"? To me, it seems arbitrary to skip some stars, however way you do it.
http://www.youtube.com/Noxxa <dwangoAC> This is a TAS (...). Not suitable for all audiences. May cause undesirable side-effects. May contain emulator abuse. Emulator may be abusive. This product contains glitches known to the state of California to cause egg defects. <Masterjun> I'm just a guy arranging bits in a sequence which could potentially amuse other people looking at these bits <adelikat> In Oregon Trail, I sacrificed my own family to save time. In Star trek, I killed helpless comrades in escape pods to save time. Here, I kill my allies to save time. I think I need help.
Noxxa
They/Them
Experienced Forum User, Moderator, Published Author, Expert player (4142)
Joined: 8/14/2009
Posts: 4083
Location: The Netherlands
Spikestuff wrote:
Something I just noticed.
Submission 1485 aka Movie 874 wrote:
Difficulty: Hard
Submission 4323 wrote:
This is a 3 minutes improvement on the current run. Difficulty: Easy
Submission 4323 wrote:
This is a 3 minutes improvement on the current run. It was played on easy to reduce lag and also to shorten some boss battles.
http://www.youtube.com/Noxxa <dwangoAC> This is a TAS (...). Not suitable for all audiences. May cause undesirable side-effects. May contain emulator abuse. Emulator may be abusive. This product contains glitches known to the state of California to cause egg defects. <Masterjun> I'm just a guy arranging bits in a sequence which could potentially amuse other people looking at these bits <adelikat> In Oregon Trail, I sacrificed my own family to save time. In Star trek, I killed helpless comrades in escape pods to save time. Here, I kill my allies to save time. I think I need help.
Noxxa
They/Them
Experienced Forum User, Moderator, Published Author, Expert player (4142)
Joined: 8/14/2009
Posts: 4083
Location: The Netherlands
atro city wrote:
Are you fucking kidding me? I make just one post in almost a year, asking a reasonable question, and of course I get railed on it. Fuck this forum.
Reading this message crossed the line for me. I am done tolerating Spikestuff's bullshit behavior. If I were a site admin or senior publisher, I'd have removed Spikestuff's publisher position right here. Instigating this sort of message from a site user is utterly unacceptable from any staff position. This isn't the first time, either. Spikestuff's aggressive, raging behavior and stirring up things has already been well known for quite some time. Spikestuff, you seem well aware of your own behavior, yet you won't change. As feos said, saying sorry won't help if you don't change. I am going to tell you right here that if you still don't tone down the aggressive behavior, and you fire up another shitstorm like this again, you will get at least a tempban or worse from me. In fact, you probably already would have gotten one if I weren't in a fairly generous mood. This is your last and only warning.
http://www.youtube.com/Noxxa <dwangoAC> This is a TAS (...). Not suitable for all audiences. May cause undesirable side-effects. May contain emulator abuse. Emulator may be abusive. This product contains glitches known to the state of California to cause egg defects. <Masterjun> I'm just a guy arranging bits in a sequence which could potentially amuse other people looking at these bits <adelikat> In Oregon Trail, I sacrificed my own family to save time. In Star trek, I killed helpless comrades in escape pods to save time. Here, I kill my allies to save time. I think I need help.
Noxxa
They/Them
Experienced Forum User, Moderator, Published Author, Expert player (4142)
Joined: 8/14/2009
Posts: 4083
Location: The Netherlands
True wrote:
There should already be a thread for this game. I remember posting in it.
Yeah, there is. Threads are merged now.
http://www.youtube.com/Noxxa <dwangoAC> This is a TAS (...). Not suitable for all audiences. May cause undesirable side-effects. May contain emulator abuse. Emulator may be abusive. This product contains glitches known to the state of California to cause egg defects. <Masterjun> I'm just a guy arranging bits in a sequence which could potentially amuse other people looking at these bits <adelikat> In Oregon Trail, I sacrificed my own family to save time. In Star trek, I killed helpless comrades in escape pods to save time. Here, I kill my allies to save time. I think I need help.
Noxxa
They/Them
Experienced Forum User, Moderator, Published Author, Expert player (4142)
Joined: 8/14/2009
Posts: 4083
Location: The Netherlands
Guys, please just keep it civil and please be polite and helpful. If you can't do that when oblvionwalker/TAG is involved, then don't post. I don't want to see another shitfest here because everyone likes trolling oblvionwalker/TAG. You should know better than that. (Just a warning in advance.)
http://www.youtube.com/Noxxa <dwangoAC> This is a TAS (...). Not suitable for all audiences. May cause undesirable side-effects. May contain emulator abuse. Emulator may be abusive. This product contains glitches known to the state of California to cause egg defects. <Masterjun> I'm just a guy arranging bits in a sequence which could potentially amuse other people looking at these bits <adelikat> In Oregon Trail, I sacrificed my own family to save time. In Star trek, I killed helpless comrades in escape pods to save time. Here, I kill my allies to save time. I think I need help.
Noxxa
They/Them
Experienced Forum User, Moderator, Published Author, Expert player (4142)
Joined: 8/14/2009
Posts: 4083
Location: The Netherlands
Warp wrote:
Mothrayas wrote:
Aqfaq wrote:
I gave my vote to the Pirate Party.
Same.
Why? They aren't looking for your best, they are just a short-sighted party with a gimmick. I will never vote for that party because they want to make me unemployed, and they don't give a s**t. And this is not a prejudiced impression I've got; this is based on a direct conversation with representatives of said party (yes, their response was pretty much "too bad" when I expressed my concerns that if they had their way, I would lose my job.)
I have no idea what exactly your job is, or how exactly the Pirate Party having their way would affect your job or cause you to lose your job. So I can't really comment there. Other than that, what can I say other than that I have had different experiences with my local Pirate Party than you had with your Pirate Party representatives? The Pirate Party Netherlands representatives I've known were actually fairly nice people, and I can generally stand by their ideals.
http://www.youtube.com/Noxxa <dwangoAC> This is a TAS (...). Not suitable for all audiences. May cause undesirable side-effects. May contain emulator abuse. Emulator may be abusive. This product contains glitches known to the state of California to cause egg defects. <Masterjun> I'm just a guy arranging bits in a sequence which could potentially amuse other people looking at these bits <adelikat> In Oregon Trail, I sacrificed my own family to save time. In Star trek, I killed helpless comrades in escape pods to save time. Here, I kill my allies to save time. I think I need help.
Noxxa
They/Them
Experienced Forum User, Moderator, Published Author, Expert player (4142)
Joined: 8/14/2009
Posts: 4083
Location: The Netherlands
Aqfaq wrote:
I gave my vote to the Pirate Party.
Same. Looks like it probably wasn't enough for the Dutch Pirate Party to get a seat but oh well. At least they are slowly rising in popularity.
Truncated wrote:
Since there are quite a few Europeans here from different countries, I thought it would be interesting to hear your perspectives. What does the debate look like where you live? What are the major topics and issues? Which parties are expected to gain seats? What is the opinion about the EU and the Euro in general? Your own views are welcome too of course, if you with to share them.
Here, most of the debate is basically pro-EU vs. anti-EU, and what effect the EU's presence has on the Dutch economy. According to preliminary, unofficial results (we voted Thursday 22nd) the pro-EU side in the Netherlands is winning from the anti-EU side (with respective Dutch political parties D66 and PVV on the winning and losing end respectively). There is some scepticism about the viability of the Euro, and the growing presence/dominance of the EU, but with what we know of the votes so far, it's not as big as was thought at first. Looks like people generally are in favor of the EU in the Netherlands.
http://www.youtube.com/Noxxa <dwangoAC> This is a TAS (...). Not suitable for all audiences. May cause undesirable side-effects. May contain emulator abuse. Emulator may be abusive. This product contains glitches known to the state of California to cause egg defects. <Masterjun> I'm just a guy arranging bits in a sequence which could potentially amuse other people looking at these bits <adelikat> In Oregon Trail, I sacrificed my own family to save time. In Star trek, I killed helpless comrades in escape pods to save time. Here, I kill my allies to save time. I think I need help.
Noxxa
They/Them
Experienced Forum User, Moderator, Published Author, Expert player (4142)
Joined: 8/14/2009
Posts: 4083
Location: The Netherlands
boct1584 wrote:
Trading speed for entertainment is an accepted practice here. Considering that the 1 press strategy takes abou 2 minutes, and the no-press takes 660 minutes, I think using the 1-press strategy would be perfectly acceptable in a TASVideos submission.
Espyo wrote:
Even still, there is such a thing as speed-entertainment tradeoff. For stages that you just cannot bypass, instead of taking 2 hours to set up enough steps for a jump, just do the jump already. It's less impressive, but it's a necessary tradeoff, so that the movie does not drag on (implying a non-skipping encode).
This is not a speed-entertainment tradeoff (doing it is in the interest of both speed and entertainment, so it's not a tradeoff for either). Instead, what you're doing is breaking the goal, as you're not really going for "minimum A presses" anymore if you start adding A presses not because it's necessary, but just because it's "more entertaining". If a movie doesn't meet its stated goal, it obviously won't be acceptable for the site. It's like creating a Super Metroid 100% run and deciding to skip a few items because that's "faster and more entertaining".
http://www.youtube.com/Noxxa <dwangoAC> This is a TAS (...). Not suitable for all audiences. May cause undesirable side-effects. May contain emulator abuse. Emulator may be abusive. This product contains glitches known to the state of California to cause egg defects. <Masterjun> I'm just a guy arranging bits in a sequence which could potentially amuse other people looking at these bits <adelikat> In Oregon Trail, I sacrificed my own family to save time. In Star trek, I killed helpless comrades in escape pods to save time. Here, I kill my allies to save time. I think I need help.
Noxxa
They/Them
Experienced Forum User, Moderator, Published Author, Expert player (4142)
Joined: 8/14/2009
Posts: 4083
Location: The Netherlands
Warp wrote:
Is there some drawback in having an additional informative tag?
Clutter. See, for instance, this publication: [2600] SNES Super Metroid "game end glitch" by Cpadolf in 12:54.71 With too many tags, the tag list just becomes an incomprehensible or hard to read mess.
http://www.youtube.com/Noxxa <dwangoAC> This is a TAS (...). Not suitable for all audiences. May cause undesirable side-effects. May contain emulator abuse. Emulator may be abusive. This product contains glitches known to the state of California to cause egg defects. <Masterjun> I'm just a guy arranging bits in a sequence which could potentially amuse other people looking at these bits <adelikat> In Oregon Trail, I sacrificed my own family to save time. In Star trek, I killed helpless comrades in escape pods to save time. Here, I kill my allies to save time. I think I need help.
Noxxa
They/Them
Experienced Forum User, Moderator, Published Author, Expert player (4142)
Joined: 8/14/2009
Posts: 4083
Location: The Netherlands
http://www.youtube.com/Noxxa <dwangoAC> This is a TAS (...). Not suitable for all audiences. May cause undesirable side-effects. May contain emulator abuse. Emulator may be abusive. This product contains glitches known to the state of California to cause egg defects. <Masterjun> I'm just a guy arranging bits in a sequence which could potentially amuse other people looking at these bits <adelikat> In Oregon Trail, I sacrificed my own family to save time. In Star trek, I killed helpless comrades in escape pods to save time. Here, I kill my allies to save time. I think I need help.
Noxxa
They/Them
Experienced Forum User, Moderator, Published Author, Expert player (4142)
Joined: 8/14/2009
Posts: 4083
Location: The Netherlands
Kurabupengin wrote:
TASeditor wrote:
Find any frame you can press a button to scroll a dialogue, if it works test the previous frame, if not test the next frame. Repeat this process until you found the first possible frame to scroll the dialogue.
Yeah... you actually select the dialogues by tapping the touch screen, not the A button. The a button is never used in game.
It doesn't matter whether you use the A button, B button, X/Y/L/R button, any button, or the touch screen - the process is still the same regardless. Let's repeat the same advice again, just with a small change:
Find any frame you can tap the touch screen to scroll a dialogue, if it works test the previous frame, if not test the next frame. Repeat this process until you found the first possible frame to scroll the dialogue.
http://www.youtube.com/Noxxa <dwangoAC> This is a TAS (...). Not suitable for all audiences. May cause undesirable side-effects. May contain emulator abuse. Emulator may be abusive. This product contains glitches known to the state of California to cause egg defects. <Masterjun> I'm just a guy arranging bits in a sequence which could potentially amuse other people looking at these bits <adelikat> In Oregon Trail, I sacrificed my own family to save time. In Star trek, I killed helpless comrades in escape pods to save time. Here, I kill my allies to save time. I think I need help.
Noxxa
They/Them
Experienced Forum User, Moderator, Published Author, Expert player (4142)
Joined: 8/14/2009
Posts: 4083
Location: The Netherlands
DarkKobold wrote:
Mothrayas wrote:
Small mixup there: feos is Senior Publisher, not Senior Judge. The Senior Judge happens to be me. And I did revert the decision to label this run as "low%".
When I went looking for who was the Senior Judge, I went to this page - http://tasvideos.org/Users.html This page makes it fairly unclear; I thought you both were.
Fair enough, that page indeed made it more confusing than it actually is. I fixed it so it's more clear now.
http://www.youtube.com/Noxxa <dwangoAC> This is a TAS (...). Not suitable for all audiences. May cause undesirable side-effects. May contain emulator abuse. Emulator may be abusive. This product contains glitches known to the state of California to cause egg defects. <Masterjun> I'm just a guy arranging bits in a sequence which could potentially amuse other people looking at these bits <adelikat> In Oregon Trail, I sacrificed my own family to save time. In Star trek, I killed helpless comrades in escape pods to save time. Here, I kill my allies to save time. I think I need help.
Noxxa
They/Them
Experienced Forum User, Moderator, Published Author, Expert player (4142)
Joined: 8/14/2009
Posts: 4083
Location: The Netherlands
DarkKobold wrote:
feos wrote:
ALAKTORN wrote:
why is it being published as “low%”? multiple people have explained how completely wrong that is
Nach wrote:
I personally tango to my own metal, and like to handle things in a shocking and most electrifying manner, although fairly so.
That's why. We all are wrong, Nach is right. Except there's nothing shocking or electrifying, it's just wrong.
Let me remind you, as Senior Judge, part of your job role is to override silly decisions by other judges. Its been done before.
Small mixup there: feos is Senior Publisher, not Senior Judge. The Senior Judge happens to be me. And I did revert the decision to label this run as "low%".
http://www.youtube.com/Noxxa <dwangoAC> This is a TAS (...). Not suitable for all audiences. May cause undesirable side-effects. May contain emulator abuse. Emulator may be abusive. This product contains glitches known to the state of California to cause egg defects. <Masterjun> I'm just a guy arranging bits in a sequence which could potentially amuse other people looking at these bits <adelikat> In Oregon Trail, I sacrificed my own family to save time. In Star trek, I killed helpless comrades in escape pods to save time. Here, I kill my allies to save time. I think I need help.
Noxxa
They/Them
Experienced Forum User, Moderator, Published Author, Expert player (4142)
Joined: 8/14/2009
Posts: 4083
Location: The Netherlands
It's Super Metroid, obviously it's so important it has to be listed twice.
http://www.youtube.com/Noxxa <dwangoAC> This is a TAS (...). Not suitable for all audiences. May cause undesirable side-effects. May contain emulator abuse. Emulator may be abusive. This product contains glitches known to the state of California to cause egg defects. <Masterjun> I'm just a guy arranging bits in a sequence which could potentially amuse other people looking at these bits <adelikat> In Oregon Trail, I sacrificed my own family to save time. In Star trek, I killed helpless comrades in escape pods to save time. Here, I kill my allies to save time. I think I need help.
Noxxa
They/Them
Experienced Forum User, Moderator, Published Author, Expert player (4142)
Joined: 8/14/2009
Posts: 4083
Location: The Netherlands
It is unfortunate how this run blows away the really extensive and fun setup of the previous Super Mario World arbitrary code execution runs. In my opinion, what made the previous runs so interesting is how many steps were required to make it possible. On the other hand...this is quite a bit faster than I'd even expect from an improvement. What's next? Breaking a game before the end of the title screen? EDIT: Also, I vote meh. Great improvement timewise, but as anything resembling gameplay is dwindled so much, it just becomes boring to watch.
http://www.youtube.com/Noxxa <dwangoAC> This is a TAS (...). Not suitable for all audiences. May cause undesirable side-effects. May contain emulator abuse. Emulator may be abusive. This product contains glitches known to the state of California to cause egg defects. <Masterjun> I'm just a guy arranging bits in a sequence which could potentially amuse other people looking at these bits <adelikat> In Oregon Trail, I sacrificed my own family to save time. In Star trek, I killed helpless comrades in escape pods to save time. Here, I kill my allies to save time. I think I need help.
Noxxa
They/Them
Experienced Forum User, Moderator, Published Author, Expert player (4142)
Joined: 8/14/2009
Posts: 4083
Location: The Netherlands
I just watched the whole thing in one sitting (having seen most of the WIPs already). During the ring stages, it was interesting to look at virtual Metropolis. It's interesting how such a large and relatively detailed environment is mostly wasted on just a ton of ring flying and the occasional limited intermissions. Anyway, yes vote. If you can get past watching the ring stages, it's just fun how quick each indoor stage is glitched to completion.
http://www.youtube.com/Noxxa <dwangoAC> This is a TAS (...). Not suitable for all audiences. May cause undesirable side-effects. May contain emulator abuse. Emulator may be abusive. This product contains glitches known to the state of California to cause egg defects. <Masterjun> I'm just a guy arranging bits in a sequence which could potentially amuse other people looking at these bits <adelikat> In Oregon Trail, I sacrificed my own family to save time. In Star trek, I killed helpless comrades in escape pods to save time. Here, I kill my allies to save time. I think I need help.