+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
Hola Miolakesanto, bienvenido/a a Tasvideos. Es importante que sepas que acá no publicamos todas los TASes que nos mandan; sólo las mejores. Como dijo DJ_Incineration arriba, es posible mejorar bastante la película que nos mandaste así que vas a tener que seguir trabajando en ella antes de que la podamos aceptar. Por suerte hay un montón de material para aprender a optimizar tu TAS al máximo, empezando por esta serie de artículos que te recomiendo leer. Por otro lado, hay mucha gente que te puede guiar cuando tengas alguna duda. Recomiendo el foro en Español o bien que entres al Discord de Tasvideos donde podés presentarte y hacer preguntas (sólo en ingles).
How to sumbit a movie in the OFFICIAL CHANNEL?
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
With the old site, it was arguably harder to get an April Fools submission published due to rules of acceptance at the time.
I mean a week or two early, to allow for judging, encoding, etc.
But more importantly: what is the goal of an AFD run?
But whom is the joke for?
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
Do you think you will re-submit stop and swap now that it works in 2.9.1?
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
Which part of my explanations fails to work in fighting games and why, exactly?
I can refer to Guilty Gear X: Advance Edition where Ky is obsoleted by Zato as they're both characters available form the start for an instance of a character that wasn't unlocked.
Interestingly, suboptimal chars make labeling kinda tricky. Not necessarily harder to do, but it may look inconsistent across all movies on the site.
In my opinion the character should obsolete the other regardless if they're an unlocked character or not and if they're an unlock then they should have the tag of well in this case `Second quest/Post game-completion`. We have tags, we should make the tags work at the very least, we still make new ones to this day. This allows it to be simplified, and any other run from an unlocked roster or a standard one can instead go to Playground whilst the actual fastest can obsolete one another. This also allows another type of branch for fighting games, where you have the fastest character, a playaround and then "all endings", at least for the fighting games that show off different endings. SRAM should obsolete, but only for Fighting Games, and the information has to be very clear about it in the Publication. It will also cause the least amount of headaches.
._.
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
- They can't be separate branches, because then they'd have to be labeled by character name, which would mean we have to allow different chars to co-exist in Standard (or look like we already do). Not true. As I mentioned in the previous post, we only put the char name in the branch label if showcasing that specific char was the sole purpose of the movie and it didn't end up in Standard. Since Standard wants optimality within certain allowed goals, only the most optimal char is allowed, so whichever is currently known to be optimal for a particular goal will be used. If a different char is discovered to be more optimal, its movie will obsolete, and neither needs a char name.
A character name as a branch implies we would accept and publish every character. Which isn't good on the site side, as Judges and Publishers will have to deal with a "mess" of fighting game TASes. But I already experimented with that idea with 5 separate characters in Tekken 3 and they're ineligible to be accepted due to Yoshimitsu (and that puddle can get muddier, but let's avoid that puddle) and of course Guilty Gear X as I referred to earlier.
tl;dr what I wrote. Is unlock character faster? > Yes Obsolete.
Understand what we, the side that's against this arbitrary branch is trying to tell you. Don't gloss over it. I'm not responding back if you don't get our point of concern, cause everything doesn't always work. And definitely doesn't work here for fighting games.
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
I managed to save 3 frames.
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
But then that leaves the question of whether a run that prioritises IGT over TAS time should obsolete, or exist in a separate branch from, one that prioritises TAS time over IGT.
In any case, it's effectively just NG vs. NG+, and it seems wrong to me that a NG+ run would obsolete a NG run. Just my two cents.
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
Why should it outright obsolete?
There's been a disagreement among staff regarding labeling of save-anchored branches that don't involve unlockable modes.
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.
+fsvgm777 never censoring anything.