Locked



1 2
10 11 12
27 28
Post subject: Re: Duplicated entries in Movie Statistics
Emulator Coder, Skilled player (1114)
Joined: 5/1/2010
Posts: 1217
Warp wrote:
Kmz wrote:
I saw duplicated entries of 2109M, 2079M and 2031M.
I think the code gets duplicate entries from the database in certain situations, but I don't remember the details. (The fix would be to merge duplicates in said code.)
I think it requires the movie to have two or more torrents plus some other condition (possibly that there is a torrent of another movie with file ID between the two). Edit: Scratch that: 2109M has torrents with adjacent IDs: 17387 and 17388. Edit #2: It appears to be that there will be a duplicate if the multiple entries for a movie end up being not adjacent to each other when sorted (the sort isn't stable w.r.t. the movie ID or the file ID). Edit #3: Fixed.
Banned User
Joined: 3/10/2004
Posts: 7698
Location: Finland
Btw, I have to apologize for the messiness of that code. It was a really bad case of "start with a simple feature, then add a new feature to it, and keep adding features, without ever refactoring the whole thing from scratch, and end up with a real mess." I hope it's not really horrifying to wade through... :)
Active player (322)
Joined: 1/15/2012
Posts: 343
Small bug : last message is timestamp : http://i.imgur.com/LUEcW.png while it should be http://i.imgur.com/OkY0V.png .
Emulator Coder, Skilled player (1114)
Joined: 5/1/2010
Posts: 1217
STBM wrote:
Small bug : last message is timestamp : http://i.imgur.com/LUEcW.png while it should be http://i.imgur.com/OkY0V.png .
Probably because submission delete doesn't delete the thread right way, resulting that kind of thing.
Post subject: Movie ratings invisible even to self if not set public?
Editor, Emulator Coder, Expert player (2159)
Joined: 5/22/2007
Posts: 1134
Location: Glitchvania
BTW, why all of a sudden everyone has been defaulted to non-public ratings?
<klmz> it reminds me of that people used to keep quoting adelikat's IRC statements in the old good days <adelikat> no doubt <adelikat> klmz, they still do
Post subject: Re: Movie ratings invisible even to self if not set public?
Editor, Skilled player (1537)
Joined: 7/9/2010
Posts: 1319
klmz wrote:
BTW, why all of a sudden everyone has been defaulted to non-public ratings?
Cause of this.
Favorite animal: STOCK Gt(ROSA)26Sortm1.1(rtTA,EGFP)Nagy Grm7Tg(SMN2)89Ahmb Smn1tm1Msd Tg(SMN2*delta7)4299Ahmb Tg(tetO-SMN2,-luc)#aAhmb/J YouTube Twitch
Editor, Experienced player (570)
Joined: 11/8/2010
Posts: 4038
On the all Vault movies page, I can see the publication text I wrote for this movie when I'm logged in, but when I'm logged out, the text still has the TODO it had before I decided to update it. Whether I'm logged in or not, my publication text is still there on the main publication page. I'm at school, on a Mac, using Safari, if that helps.
adelikat
He/Him
Emulator Coder, Site Developer, Site Owner, Expert player (3576)
Joined: 11/3/2004
Posts: 4754
Location: Tennessee
Movie text is cached for non-logged in users. I don't know the duration, but it will be updated with your change, at some point.
It's hard to look this good. My TAS projects
Skilled player (1743)
Joined: 9/17/2009
Posts: 4986
Location: ̶C̶a̶n̶a̶d̶a̶ "Kanatah"
Emulator Coder, Skilled player (1114)
Joined: 5/1/2010
Posts: 1217
jlun2 wrote:
Normal sized font.
Normal
Big
Bigger
Messed up font size.
Er, what? I don't see the problem (and I looked at the post markup)...
Skilled player (1743)
Joined: 9/17/2009
Posts: 4986
Location: ̶C̶a̶n̶a̶d̶a̶ "Kanatah"
Ilari wrote:
jlun2 wrote:
Normal sized font.
Normal
Big
Bigger
Messed up font size.
Er, what? I don't see the problem (and I looked at the post markup)...
Wait, let me take a screenshot of what I see on my laptop. (Using Google Chrome, btw) Edit:
Player (146)
Joined: 7/16/2009
Posts: 686
Using Firefox, the "Big" and "Bigger" are normal, the "Messed up font size." is as big as in jlun2's screencap. The link-blue is also screwed up the same way.
Skilled player (1828)
Joined: 4/20/2005
Posts: 2161
Location: Norrköping, Sweden
I get an error when I try to upload a certain .bkm file to my userfiles page. I get the error:
<<< Can't parse movie (error from format parser) >>>
Errors from the movie parser:

error_handler:
	errstr=Division by zero
	errfile=/home/tasvideos/public_html/formats/bkm.php
	errline=77
The movie file isn't broken, I've played it back in several versions of Bizhawk without any problems.
Player (56)
Joined: 10/16/2012
Posts: 233
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Quite a few times, a forum topic has been "truncated" when I visit. For example, there were 30 pages in the Super Mario Bros. topic when I last visited, but now there are 29!
If I could have a tool-assisted real life, I'd... Being a novice, I'd probably load the wrong state, have the IRS AI bankrupt me, and eventually make me want to kill myself and redo 11 years of hard work.
Brandon
He/Him
Editor, Player (191)
Joined: 11/21/2010
Posts: 914
Location: Tennessee
Randil wrote:
I get an error when I try to upload a certain .bkm file to my userfiles page. I get the error:
<<< Can't parse movie (error from format parser) >>>
Errors from the movie parser:

error_handler:
	errstr=Division by zero
	errfile=/home/tasvideos/public_html/formats/bkm.php
	errline=77
The movie file isn't broken, I've played it back in several versions of Bizhawk without any problems.
Try again.
All the best, Brandon Evans
Skilled player (1828)
Joined: 4/20/2005
Posts: 2161
Location: Norrköping, Sweden
Brandon wrote:
Randil wrote:
I get an error when I try to upload a certain .bkm file to my userfiles page. I get the error:
<<< Can't parse movie (error from format parser) >>>
Errors from the movie parser:

error_handler:
	errstr=Division by zero
	errfile=/home/tasvideos/public_html/formats/bkm.php
	errline=77
The movie file isn't broken, I've played it back in several versions of Bizhawk without any problems.
Try again.
It worked now, thanks!
Site Admin, Skilled player (1255)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11495
Location: Lake Char­gogg­a­gogg­man­chaugg­a­gogg­chau­bun­a­gung­a­maugg
Brilliant!
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Editor, Expert player (2080)
Joined: 6/15/2005
Posts: 3284
The technical rating sort in the Movie Filter doesn't seem to order the movies correctly. http://tasvideos.org/Movies-Moons-RatingQ-NoScreenshot-NoTier-NoFlags.html According to what I see, [1836] 32X The Amazing Spider-Man: Web of Fire by Aqfaq & mmbossman in 06:45.48 is first with a tech rating of 7.5 . [2230] A2600 Phoenix by Lollorcaust in 00:18.15 is next with a tech rating of 5.5 . [2062] N64 Super Mario 64 "70 stars, no Backwards Long Jump" by Jesus, Kaylee, MICKEY_Vis11189, MoltovM, Nahoc, snark, sonicpacker, ToT, CeeSammerZ, coin2884, Eru, Goronem, Mokkori, Nekuran, Nothing693 & pasta in 42:58.52 is somewhere in the middle with a tech rating of 9.5 . Edit: By the way, the rating sort options attempt to sort movies even if they have less than three votes (which means the rating is not shown).
feos wrote:
Brilliant!
If you mean a few edits being assigned a Unix time of 0, well, we don't know how it happened. But it hasn't happened any time recently, so no one cares.
Active player (451)
Joined: 3/21/2011
Posts: 127
Location: Virginia (United States)
On the main page, BBCodes will become visible if they're right on the spot where the publication text is cut off. I know this happens with this run, but I don't know if any others have this happen.
YouTube Channel - Twitter Current projects: Sutte Hakkun, Hyper VI, RTDL, own hacking projects
Editor, Expert player (2080)
Joined: 6/15/2005
Posts: 3284
The technical rating sort in the Movie Filter still doesn't work. All it does is order the movies in alphabetical order. For example: http://tasvideos.org/Movies-Stars-RatingQ-NoScreenshot-NoTier-NoFlags.html
Emulator Coder, Skilled player (1114)
Joined: 5/1/2010
Posts: 1217
FractalFusion wrote:
The technical rating sort in the Movie Filter still doesn't work. All it does is order the movies in alphabetical order.
Should be fixed now.
Editor, Experienced player (570)
Joined: 11/8/2010
Posts: 4038
Whenever I make an edit to a page (on the Wiki) and I check the IRC Notify box and not Minor Edit, whatever I write as my edit summary does not show up in the page's history (and is instead replaced by a blank). I assume this is a bug, since others have submitted "major" edits that show correctly, and minor edits have always shown up just fine. I know it's not my browser or computer, either, as I've seen this happen on Internet Explorer and Firefox on my Windows computer as well as Firefox on a Mac. This is the most recent page I've had this problem with. The edit summary would say "expanded description" if it was there.
Site Admin, Skilled player (1255)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11495
Location: Lake Char­gogg­a­gogg­man­chaugg­a­gogg­chau­bun­a­gung­a­maugg
You always should write to the upper field, checkboxes are not designed to be relevant to fields actually.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Editor, Experienced player (570)
Joined: 11/8/2010
Posts: 4038
Ohhh, that makes sense! Thank you very much!
Player (42)
Joined: 12/27/2008
Posts: 873
Location: Germany
At the featured movie page, "Read More..." can trim the movie description in the middle of a tag, leaving it malformed:
1 2
10 11 12
27 28

Locked