• Aims for fastest time
  • Abuses programming errors
  • Takes damage to save time
  • Manipulates luck

Plugins...

Video Plugin: Jabo's Direct3D8 1.6; Sound Plugin: Jabo's DirectSound 1.6; Input Plugin: TAS Input Plugin 0.6; RSP: RSP emulation Plugin

AKA's comments...

Initially, the target was to break 15 mins, since the previous run had 12-13 seconds of known improvements, which would've taken it nicely below 15 minutes. Although with a little bit of messing around in the basement on a N64, and tossing away all the tiring and obvious lines of enquiry in the past, I began to get suspicious of possible BLJ locations, as I managed to get 3-4 BLJs in a row on a console, which made me want to fully TAS it, although it was not done on the one seen in the finished run as it later turned out to be impossible to gain any sort of infinite speed. In total, there are 5 BLJ locations in the basement, with another one or two locations being entirley unconfirmed. It seems that a banister, unlike an outer wall, is able to hold Mario and stop him sliding out of the BLJ location, which is why the previously mentioned ones don't work. Sadly, for the time being, DDD is not skippable, so there is no 0 star run. It's a shame that this makes the 16 star catagory obselete, since it wasn't quite perfected yet.

Swordless Link's comments...

I had just came back from a holiday to find all the hype about new BLJ locations in the basement. Needless to say, I was keen to investigate these, as it meant a possible 1 or 0 star TAS. When I found out about them, I checked the TAS forums, and found that AKA had found something that might have been useful, so I contacted him about it and was informed that he was unable to gain enough speed to break the door. I suggested that we find a way to get Mario stuck against the banister, so AKA and I experimented with the stairs and eventually came to the conclusion that holding the analogue stick in the general direction of the nearby key door meant that Mario would not leave the BLJ area until he had a significantly higher amount of speed than in AKA's initial attempt, which happened to be enough to break the door. I'm satisfied with the final time of the run, after all, it is the first of its kind, but even then I feel that it's very optimal.

People we want to thank...

Rikku: For the DDD and BitS timesavers.
mr_roberts_z: For the idea of long jumping after performing the stair glitch in the room beyond the second keydoor.

About the glitch...

Riddle me this It liek at the corner of the basement but next to the slope that slopes down to the water, I was facing sideways and I went in the ledge was just above the rim and started bljing like mad,
unfortunatley I've never done it again and I can't record nor upload any screenshots, but the descriptions there so anyone can do what I just did.
Written by Mitjitsu, contructed by nesrocks.

1 2
6 7 8
Active player (277)
Joined: 5/29/2004
Posts: 5712
Truncated wrote:
>There is a severe problem with "vote no" == "reject the run" in your heads. This is not just in people's heads.
Exactly. "Did you enjoy watching this movie?" is essentially the same as "Is this movie publish-worthy?" because the answers influence whether the movie will be published, and you only want to publish movies that are enjoyable. Right?
put yourself in my rocketpack if that poochie is one outrageous dude
S@G
Joined: 9/7/2006
Posts: 81
Location: Luxemburg
I have uploadet the Movie to Soapbox http://soapbox.msn.com/video.aspx?vid=18f62a3b-a559-44a6-a221-28dd2c58c381 if you (the Movie Creators) dont't want that its there, I will delete it, as soon as possible.
I don't need a Signature
Joined: 11/16/2006
Posts: 66
Xkeeper wrote:
If anything, you should be thankful that someone has enough courage to speak up
Get over yourself; is the goal of this site really important enough to make you a hero by voting no to everything? Voting no because you think a run is boring is fine, but doing it just to be different/special/get attention is immature and a waste of time. Also did it ever occur to you that for some people speed might equal entertainment? It seems that you believe thinking the opposite is more enlightened, but I submit that both opinions are equally valid.
Editor, Experienced player (730)
Joined: 6/13/2006
Posts: 3300
Location: Massachussetts, USA
JXQ wrote:
finally an N64 movie that was up to par with the rest of the site!
Low Blow! :-D
Homepage ☣ Retired
Experienced player (699)
Joined: 2/19/2006
Posts: 742
Location: Quincy, MA
comicalflop wrote:
JXQ wrote:
finally an N64 movie that was up to par with the rest of the site!
There's only like 5 N64 runs though. I haven't watched tetrisphere, but that looks very interesting. Reguardless of the glitches in sm64, I still found this new video very entertaining. If you aren't in to this type of run, appreciate the 120 star run. This site aims for speed and has accomplished just that with this new run. It is faster than the super mario bros. 2 TAS, which blows my mind.
Super Mario Bros. console speedrunner - Andrew Gardikis
Joined: 7/28/2005
Posts: 339
Raiscan wrote:
At the risk of fueling the fire of debate, the same could be said by some with the Megaman games. Speed doesn't always equal entertainment. Its a shame that its usually speed that is checked when there are major time differences, but what other option is there? Lots of different categories? "Glitchless" runs? But then that wouldn't fit for the nicely lengthed 16-star run. perhaps "Slightly glitchless but enough to make this run interesting".
With the Megaman games, however, you at least get to see all of the levels in the game, and you get to see each individual level broken in to pieces. With this run, you see four of the most boring levels in the game (that, of course, being opinion) with three slow boss fights. Yawn. It's not even close to a good comparison.
TGPrimus wrote:
Xkeeper wrote:
If anything, you should be thankful that someone has enough courage to speak up
Get over yourself; is the goal of this site really important enough to make you a hero by voting no to everything? Voting no because you think a run is boring is fine, but doing it just to be different/special/get attention is immature and a waste of time. Also did it ever occur to you that for some people speed might equal entertainment? It seems that you believe thinking the opposite is more enlightened, but I submit that both opinions are equally valid.
Okay, look at Xkeeper's signature, including the white part. He's not going to vote no on all the videos out of spite. He's just making fun of the situation where there's personal attacks (such as the one you made in this post) towards him.
JXQ wrote:
finally an N64 movie that was up to par with the rest of the site!
There's only like 5 N64 runs though. I haven't watched tetrisphere, but that looks very interesting.[/quote] I think he was referring to the runs in general, across all consoles.
upthorn
He/Him
Emulator Coder, Active player (388)
Joined: 3/24/2006
Posts: 1802
Truncated wrote:
I think the movie was cool.
Agreed.
For people who want to see more of the game (I don't), we already have an excellent (or so I'm told) 120-star movie, so I think obsoleting was the correct way to go.
Disagreed. There are three points to be made here that immediately spring to mind
  1. It is entirely possible to want to see the game played for more than 6 minutes without wanting to see it played for nearly an hour and a half.
  2. The 120-star run is incredibly repetitive, due to playing every level 7 times. The routes over lap too much, and the levels don't have enough variety to justify being played 7 times back to back.
  3. Comparing the average quality of play of the 120-star run to the average quality of play of the 16-star run, the 16-star comes out way ahead. (For clarification, by quality of play I mostly mean things like speed and glitch exploitation.)
Now, to throw in an opinion-based statement, I feel that the run this obsoleted was more entertaining than either this run, or the 120-star run, and I believe there are many others who would agree.
How fleeting are all human passions compared with the massive continuity of ducks.
Banned User, Former player
Joined: 12/23/2004
Posts: 1850
TGPrimus wrote:
Xkeeper wrote:
If anything, you should be thankful that someone has enough courage to speak up
Get over yourself; is the goal of this site really important enough to make you a hero by voting no to everything? Voting no because you think a run is boring is fine, but doing it just to be different/special/get attention is immature and a waste of time.
I don't* vote no on** every submission**. In short, your post falls apart right then and there. If you didn't already get my point, I vote "no" on a portion of movies I am not entertained by; the majority is by far "yes". I do not vote against a majority to "be different" -- my opinion is not with you and I am not voting with you. * This post is a joke pointed at this thread ** I don't actually know where my post in this thread was. For the Ocarina of Time movie, I do remember it basically saying "this movie + commentary = best movie on this site by far," however.
Perma-banned
Experienced player (601)
Joined: 10/23/2004
Posts: 706
While I probably did find the 16 star more entertaining, 95% of what is found in that run can be found in the 120 star run (especially when someone gets around to improving it again :) ). Still, this is a groundbreaking run. I suppose that many of you complaining about this run don't remember when BLJing was discovered. In 2002 the first 31 star runs were completed. Then, that same year, MIPS was used to create a 16 star run. Immediately people began speculating about a possible 1 or 0 star run. Now 1 star has been achieved, this is a GREAT milestone and something anticipated by the SM64 community for 5 years. PLUS, this appears to be a TAS exclusive. What more could you ask for?!! I voted YES.
Current Project: - Mario Kart 64
Mitjitsu
He/Him
Banned User, Experienced player (532)
Joined: 4/24/2006
Posts: 2997
About the moat outside the castle I did some testing on it a very long time ago, (I beleve the date is stated on the upload) and either A this method is impossible B Mario can't gain enough speed. http://files.filefront.com/M64+theoryavi/;6392632;;/fileinfo.html
Former player
Joined: 12/27/2006
Posts: 532
Location: Göteborg, Sweden
AKA wrote:
About the moat outside the castle I did some testing on it a very long time ago, (I beleve the date is stated on the upload) and either A this method is impossible B Mario can't gain enough speed. http://files.filefront.com/M64+theoryavi/;6392632;;/fileinfo.html
I'm quite certain BLJing into the moat door is impossibe. There is a loading trigger on it too, and you can't open doors underwater. :(
My published movies [03:45:05] <Naohiro19> Soulrivers: ... [03:45:19] <Soulrivers> ? [03:46:35] <Naohiro19> <Soulrivers> No! <Naohiro19> So? <Soulrivers> Yes! [03:46:48] <Naohiro19> joke
Experienced player (699)
Joined: 2/19/2006
Posts: 742
Location: Quincy, MA
So if you go through the key doors using that glitch, and try and open it from the other side they will not open? Do you think you could access the area with invisible cap switch somehow using BLJs?
Super Mario Bros. console speedrunner - Andrew Gardikis
Former player
Joined: 7/21/2006
Posts: 747
Location: Northern Hemisphere
We were hypothesizing... What if we could get into VCUtM without ever going into the castle? Just somehow BLJ into the loading point or something (it seems that unlike the doors, the loading point is still there, but just covered by a grate. Kind of like the entrance to Wiggler's Cave), and maybe just die from inside there. What would happen after that? Maybe the water would be gone from the moat. We haven't really tested this; using the level select thing doesn't work, but if anyone knows a GS code or something, trying it out would help.
Experienced player (699)
Joined: 2/19/2006
Posts: 742
Location: Quincy, MA
VCUtM? Is that where the invisible switch is? I have gameshark. I'm going to test some things out on console, I most likely will not find anything, but it's worth a shot.
Super Mario Bros. console speedrunner - Andrew Gardikis
Player (88)
Joined: 11/14/2005
Posts: 1057
Location: United States
vanish cap under the moat :D seems like a very plausible improvement, that is unless the water puts an immediate halt to the built up speed.
They're off to find the hero of the day...
Experienced player (699)
Joined: 2/19/2006
Posts: 742
Location: Quincy, MA
Could you drain the water by stomping the pillars and somehow force yoursef into the area where the second bowser is by doing BLJs?
Super Mario Bros. console speedrunner - Andrew Gardikis
nesrocks
He/Him
Player (241)
Joined: 5/1/2004
Posts: 4096
Location: Rio, Brazil
andrewg wrote:
Could you drain the water by stomping the pillars and somehow force yoursef into the area where the second bowser is by doing BLJs?
first you need to get to the pillars.
Former player
Joined: 10/1/2006
Posts: 1102
Location: boot_camp
I tried using metal mario to open the moat door but he just stands there. Also using a cheat to bypass the VCutM grate doesn't do much good as it seems like the trigger to enter the area doesn't exist until you drain the moat, otherwise it's just solid ground colored black.
Borg Collective wrote:
Negotiation is irrelevant. Self-determination is irrelevant. You will be assimilated.
Experienced player (699)
Joined: 2/19/2006
Posts: 742
Location: Quincy, MA
FODA wrote:
andrewg wrote:
Could you drain the water by stomping the pillars and somehow force yoursef into the area where the second bowser is by doing BLJs?
first you need to get to the pillars.
Can't you get to them just by walking through some doors in the castle?
Super Mario Bros. console speedrunner - Andrew Gardikis
Former player
Joined: 10/1/2006
Posts: 1102
Location: boot_camp
andrewg wrote:
FODA wrote:
andrewg wrote:
Could you drain the water by stomping the pillars and somehow force yoursef into the area where the second bowser is by doing BLJs?
first you need to get to the pillars.
Can't you get to them just by walking through some doors in the castle?
No it's only accessible from the moat door (which requires the water to be drained) or the door in the basement, the latter of which would defeat the purpose since you would be able to enter DDD early by then anyway.
Borg Collective wrote:
Negotiation is irrelevant. Self-determination is irrelevant. You will be assimilated.
Experienced player (699)
Joined: 2/19/2006
Posts: 742
Location: Quincy, MA
laughing_gas wrote:
andrewg wrote:
FODA wrote:
andrewg wrote:
Could you drain the water by stomping the pillars and somehow force yoursef into the area where the second bowser is by doing BLJs?
first you need to get to the pillars.
Can't you get to them just by walking through some doors in the castle?
No it's only accessible from the moat door (which requires the water to be drained) or the door in the basement, the latter of which would defeat the purpose since you would be able to enter DDD early by then anyway.
I was thinking of some possiblity to glitch to the second bowser.
Super Mario Bros. console speedrunner - Andrew Gardikis
Yrr
Joined: 8/10/2006
Posts: 289
Location: Germany, Bayern
Meh vote, cuz I saw all places thousand times already, and this is not so entertaining. Btw, can't this strange speedglitch be used on the stairs which lead up to the upper part of the castle? Because then we could finish it with 0 stars.
Joined: 5/2/2006
Posts: 1020
Location: Boulder, CO
Yrr wrote:
Meh vote, cuz I saw all places thousand times already, and this is not so entertaining. Btw, can't this strange speedglitch be used on the stairs which lead up to the upper part of the castle? Because then we could finish it with 0 stars.
That has been adressed many times already. Short answer: No. The upper floor loads only if you open the door to the upper floor using the key.
Has never colored a dinosaur.
Active player (441)
Joined: 3/21/2006
Posts: 940
Location: Toronto, Canada
This run can be described in exactly three words: NO FUCKING WAY!!! This run is incredible, revolutionary, whatever you want to call it. It has defied all possible conceptions of 16-star running. Congratulations to both of you for your excellent work. Add my name to the list of "have-my-babies" votes.
My current project: Something mysterious (oooooh!) My username is all lower-case letters. Please get it right :(
nesrocks
He/Him
Player (241)
Joined: 5/1/2004
Posts: 4096
Location: Rio, Brazil
Yrr wrote:
Meh vote, cuz I saw all places thousand times already, and this is not so entertaining. Btw, can't this strange speedglitch be used on the stairs which lead up to the upper part of the castle? Because then we could finish it with 0 stars.
haha, nothing personal, Yrr, but we should really start counting everytime this suggestion is made :)
1 2
6 7 8