[14:15] <feos> WinDOES what DOSn't
12:33:44 PM <Mothrayas> "I got an oof with my game!"
Mothrayas Today at 12:22: <Colin> thank you for supporting noble causes such as my feet
MemoryTAS Today at 11:55 AM: you wouldn't know beauty if it slapped you in the face with a giant fish
[Today at 4:51 PM] Mothrayas: although if you like your own tweets that's the online equivalent of sniffing your own farts and probably tells a lot about you as a person
MemoryTAS Today at 7:01 PM: But I exert big staff energy honestly lol
Samsara Today at 1:20 PM: wouldn't ACE in a real life TAS just stand for Actually Cease Existing
[4115] GBC Pokémon: Trading Card Game "game end glitch" by gifvex in 02:57.36 to Vault.
I'm quite dissapointed in this movie. I thought it was going to do something cool looking to skip to the credits, but the glitch itself was uninteresting, not to mention it is done at the tutorial, the most boring part of the whole game. Don't really know why its Moon tier honestly.
This was only recently submitted, judged and accepted to Moons. I would give it more time, it's only been on the site 9 days and has 4.5 votes so far. Seeing as it's of a game in a popular series, it should receive more votes before long.
Ambassador, Moderator, Site Developer, Player
(155)
Joined: 3/17/2018
Posts: 358
Location: Holland, MI
To me, most of the entertainment comes from knowing the history of the category, with years of memes about a tutorial skip and the category being previously completely glitchless, to now see a tutorial skip into a credits warp is hilarious (not to mention technically intricate).
However, at the same time I can understand how a viewer with no context might find a video that is essentially half the tutorial and a few deck edits to be highly lacking in entertainment. Which is unfortunate, as the full gameplay for TCG goes so fast as to make it equally difficult to watch.
I accepted it for Moons because the audience reaction was good. Although I was half expecting the publication ratings to be relatively low for entertainment, but that alone isn't enough of a reason for disregarding the submission response altogether. Anyway, please wait some more days for a tier revision.
Edit: all right, overall rating is pretty low now, I agree to change it to Vault already.
[14:15] <feos> WinDOES what DOSn't
12:33:44 PM <Mothrayas> "I got an oof with my game!"
Mothrayas Today at 12:22: <Colin> thank you for supporting noble causes such as my feet
MemoryTAS Today at 11:55 AM: you wouldn't know beauty if it slapped you in the face with a giant fish
[Today at 4:51 PM] Mothrayas: although if you like your own tweets that's the online equivalent of sniffing your own farts and probably tells a lot about you as a person
MemoryTAS Today at 7:01 PM: But I exert big staff energy honestly lol
Samsara Today at 1:20 PM: wouldn't ACE in a real life TAS just stand for Actually Cease Existing
TASvideos Admin and acting Senior Judge 💙 Currently unable to dedicate a lot of time to the site, taking care of family.
Now infrequently posting on Bluesky
I feel like a good write-up in the description can help that. Some of the SM64 descriptions talk about the history of the categories and stuff and it's pretty interesting insight. It's especially good there since similar to here, the way the glitches operate you see almost no gameplay (other than what's going on in a black void).
Hello,
I feel like this movie should be changed into Moons considering the global 7.2 rating of it.
The judge at the time considered it was worth a Moons but decided to put it in Vault because he didn't have arguments against people that didn't find the movie enough entertainning for Moons.
It's 6.5 average entertainment rating (it's up to 7.2 due to technical rating inflation). That is somewhat borderline for Moon.
However, that being said, I personally would vouch for this movie being Moons. This movie was fairly entertaining in my opinion, solving puzzles with a ton of precise movement to defeat/avoid enemies/fire.
Banjo-Tooie runner, DTC 8, 9, 10, and 11 winner, but more importantly, "When's GR?"
Current projects:
Banjo-Kazooie: Grunty's Revenge - 100% (50 minutes)
Mario Party 1 - All Boards (est: 4-6 hours)
Mario Party 3 - All Minigames (est: 40-50 minutes, not sure)
"Ooooh, I saved some more subpixels. Look at those sweet subpixels. You can't look at them, because they're subpixels, but they look so good." - The8bitbeast
"It's as if I knew what was going to happen. It's as if I had the plan written in front of me and I was reading it. I mean, I do have it in front of me, but I'm not reading it." -garagedooropener
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Banjo-Tooie runner, DTC 8, 9, 10, and 11 winner, but more importantly, "When's GR?"
Current projects:
Banjo-Kazooie: Grunty's Revenge - 100% (50 minutes)
Mario Party 1 - All Boards (est: 4-6 hours)
Mario Party 3 - All Minigames (est: 40-50 minutes, not sure)
"Ooooh, I saved some more subpixels. Look at those sweet subpixels. You can't look at them, because they're subpixels, but they look so good." - The8bitbeast
"It's as if I knew what was going to happen. It's as if I had the plan written in front of me and I was reading it. I mean, I do have it in front of me, but I'm not reading it." -garagedooropener
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11478
Location: Lake Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubunagungamaugg
Playaround can't go to Vault.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11478
Location: Lake Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubunagungamaugg
I watched them and I didn't see any real playaround in them. More like some unexpplaiable actions with unclear goal. Not sure what to think of them. They just look too outdated in general.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
[34] NES Track & Field by Arc in 08:28.05 is one of the earliest movies, made in Famtasia. At the time, movies were rejected for not being entertaining enough, but Bisqwit accepted this, meaning it would be Moons-equivalent for its time, although some improvements were found later. The game has Easter eggs called bonus babies, and some but not all of them were shown in this movie. The primary goal in the run was to get the best possible result at least once in each event, but the time wasn't minimized in events that require 3 attempts. Instead it showed slight variations in gameplay, in an attempt to be entertaining. The current movie in Moons uses the same idea. But in the end it doesn't really matter, if tiers are going to be removed from the site.