Cliffhanger is a platform game that was released on November 17, 1993 based on the film of the same name.

Game objectives

  • Emulator used: FCEUX 2.2.1
  • Aims for fastest time
  • Takes samage to save time
  • Abuses programming errors in the game

Comments

TODO: <Put here a longer explanation of the submission>
See also the descriptions in: #5983: EZGames69's NES Cliffhanger in 07:00.16

Timing difference between FCEUX and Bizhawk

The only difference in timing that I am aware of is the 1 extra lagged frame at the beginning of the run in FCEUX. Otherwise identical as far as I know.

Other Comments

Thanks to EZGames69 for making a run for a good comparison. Thanks to mtvf1 for the encode.

GoddessMaria: Judging...
GoddessMaria: Hm. As far as gameplay is concerned, it's lackluster. The optimization is most certainly there, however, the entertainment leaves something to be desired. The audience reception reflects this by how slow-placed it is. Granted that it's more due to the game itself than the run, but it's still an issue.
Accepting for Vault.
feos: Pub, after Wild Arms.


TASVideoAgent
They/Them
Moderator
Joined: 8/3/2004
Posts: 15543
Location: 127.0.0.1
This topic is for the purpose of discussing #5999: klmz's NES Cliffhanger in 06:55.12
GoddessMaria
She/Her
Reviewer, Experienced player (862)
Joined: 5/29/2009
Posts: 518
Location: Hell...
Any last comments...?
Current projects: failing at life
Editor, Reviewer, Skilled player (1352)
Joined: 9/12/2016
Posts: 1646
Location: Italy
I found this movie very slow-paced, repetitive, and I couldn't notice any interesting trick. No vote from me. Also, I don't see why the votes are so much different from the ones for EZGames69's submission, since the movie appears very similar.
my personal page - my YouTube channel - my GitHub - my Discord: thunderaxe31 <Masterjun> if you look at the "NES" in a weird angle, it actually clearly says "GBA"
EZGames69
He/They
Publisher, Reviewer, Expert player (4454)
Joined: 5/29/2017
Posts: 2761
ThunderAxe31 wrote:
I found this movie very slow-paced, repetitive, and I couldn't notice any interesting trick. No vote from me. Also, I don't see why the votes are so much different from the ones for EZGames69's submission, since the movie appears very similar.
I think since both movies very closely match each other, we should take into account the reception from my movie and apply it here too. It would be the closest we can get to having any feedback from this submission.
[14:15] <feos> WinDOES what DOSn't 12:33:44 PM <Mothrayas> "I got an oof with my game!" Mothrayas Today at 12:22: <Colin> thank you for supporting noble causes such as my feet MemoryTAS Today at 11:55 AM: you wouldn't know beauty if it slapped you in the face with a giant fish [Today at 4:51 PM] Mothrayas: although if you like your own tweets that's the online equivalent of sniffing your own farts and probably tells a lot about you as a person MemoryTAS Today at 7:01 PM: But I exert big staff energy honestly lol Samsara Today at 1:20 PM: wouldn't ACE in a real life TAS just stand for Actually Cease Existing
Joined: 10/23/2009
Posts: 545
Location: Where?
Liked the movie, but that's because I TASed it before (and didn't submit because I found one mistake in the middle of the run, and that my TAS wasn,t exhaustive). Yes vote from me.
Memory
She/Her
Site Admin, Skilled player (1551)
Joined: 3/20/2014
Posts: 1765
Location: Dumpster
Boring and repetitive, voting no.
[16:36:31] <Mothrayas> I have to say this argument about robot drug usage is a lot more fun than whatever else we have been doing in the past two+ hours
[16:08:10] <BenLubar> a TAS is just the limit of a segmented speedrun as the segment length approaches zero
Skilled player (1175)
Joined: 5/11/2011
Posts: 427
Location: China
ThunderAxe31 wrote:
Also, I don't see why the votes are so much different from the ones for EZGames69's submission, since the movie appears very similar.
Because the author is klmz.
Memory
She/Her
Site Admin, Skilled player (1551)
Joined: 3/20/2014
Posts: 1765
Location: Dumpster
mtvf1 wrote:
ThunderAxe31 wrote:
Also, I don't see why the votes are so much different from the ones for EZGames69's submission, since the movie appears very similar.
Because the author is klmz.
What is that supposed to mean?
[16:36:31] <Mothrayas> I have to say this argument about robot drug usage is a lot more fun than whatever else we have been doing in the past two+ hours
[16:08:10] <BenLubar> a TAS is just the limit of a segmented speedrun as the segment length approaches zero
Skilled player (1175)
Joined: 5/11/2011
Posts: 427
Location: China
Memory wrote:
mtvf1 wrote:
ThunderAxe31 wrote:
Also, I don't see why the votes are so much different from the ones for EZGames69's submission, since the movie appears very similar.
Because the author is klmz.
What is that supposed to mean?
I don't want to explain it.
Memory
She/Her
Site Admin, Skilled player (1551)
Joined: 3/20/2014
Posts: 1765
Location: Dumpster
mtvf1 wrote:
I don't want to explain it.
Votes backed up by strong reasons are considered more heavily than those without. If you do not wish to explain, that is fine, but it will be considered as lacking strong reason.
[16:36:31] <Mothrayas> I have to say this argument about robot drug usage is a lot more fun than whatever else we have been doing in the past two+ hours
[16:08:10] <BenLubar> a TAS is just the limit of a segmented speedrun as the segment length approaches zero
ViGadeomes
He/Him
Judge, Active player (310)
Joined: 10/16/2017
Posts: 461
Location: France
I voted yes on the 2 submissions
Site Admin, Skilled player (1250)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11473
Location: Lake Char­gogg­a­gogg­man­chaugg­a­gogg­chau­bun­a­gung­a­maugg
It doesn't have to be explained. Because it doesn't help with reading voters' minds anyway. No matter what we think of their votes' reasons, it's irrelevant if they aren't posting those reasons explicitly.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Site Admin, Skilled player (1250)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11473
Location: Lake Char­gogg­a­gogg­man­chaugg­a­gogg­chau­bun­a­gung­a­maugg
Oh btw, I tried to watch it. The game's mood is so depressive that the movie is very hard to watch without fast-forwarding. And every time you skip ahead, you see and hear the same everything, with just a bit different level layout. Voting No.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Experienced player (875)
Joined: 11/15/2010
Posts: 267
I probably mentioned this in the previous submission for this game, but we played it in a Big 20. Not really high on my list as a game to play, and platform hitboxes suck. I enjoyed the run though, well done. Also, I don't think you can really go wrong by making your way down a mountain using your enemy as a snowboard
Post subject: Movie published
TASVideoAgent
They/Them
Moderator
Joined: 8/3/2004
Posts: 15543
Location: 127.0.0.1
This movie has been published. The posts before this message apply to the submission, and posts after this message apply to the published movie. ---- [3752] NES Cliffhanger by klmz in 06:55.12