Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11478
Location: Lake Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubunagungamaugg
Vault/Moon border seems to be unmaintainable manually (who currently adjusts it?) Why not make it automatic then?
EDIT:
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11478
Location: Lake Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubunagungamaugg
Categories also can be filtered by surely.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
The criterion for initial placement of previously published movies was an entertainment rating cutoff at 5.7. adelikat never said that any rating cutoff criteria are currently enforced or that they should be currently enforced.
I have to agree that an automatic tier placement is not a good idea. While it would certainly be easier, I think that it's better if the tier of each run is decided on a case-by-case basis.
Keep in mind that there are 68 Star publications, 689 Moon publications, and 469 Vault publications.
I wonder if that's too many moons. If there are too many, it kind of muddles its meaning. (Unless "Moon" is meant to be "your average, run-of-the-mill TAS" and "Vault" is meant to be "those that would otherwise be rejected under the old system." I'm not sure I would agree to that kind of categorization, but that's just my opinion of course.)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11478
Location: Lake Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubunagungamaugg
Stars are exactly 10% of Moons, that's the quota. However, discussing the worthiness of particular stars is always welcome (in a certain thread).
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11478
Location: Lake Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubunagungamaugg
NitroGenesis wrote:
I think there's too many stars. Family Feud has one? Are you serious?
It has 11th highest entertainment rating among all our publications. And all that are higher are only speed oriented. It does tell something about how worthy it is.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
I think the moon-vault ratio will change in the future, so that it will have more vault movies. It's still a new system and as we can see, there are a number of movies that are placed in the wrong tier. So I'm not too worried about it.
Oh and keep Family Feud in the stars. It absolutely deserves this spot! It's one of the best non-speed oriented TASes on the site, along with the ISS Deluxe playaround.
Current project: Gex 3 any%
Paused: Gex 64 any%
There are no N64 emulators. Just SM64 emulators with hacky support for all the other games.
Tell me one thing that makes Family Feud stand out. It's just text being entered quickly. Not very outstanding when compared to the rest of the TASes there.
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11478
Location: Lake Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubunagungamaugg
It's ok to disagree with 80 people, it's understood.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11478
Location: Lake Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubunagungamaugg
Yep.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Entertainment > everything else. That movie had phenomenal reception from the audience. It may not be especially interesting to you, but that doesn't mean it's not star-worthy.
Pyrel - an open-source rewrite of the Angband roguelike game in Python.
Tell me one thing that makes Family Feud stand out. It's just text being entered quickly. Not very outstanding when compared to the rest of the TASes there.
Obsolete Family Feud with an even more funny entertaining TAS and I'll agree with you.
Emulator Coder, Site Developer, Site Owner, Expert player
(3573)
Joined: 11/3/2004
Posts: 4754
Location: Tennessee
1) this is an inappropiate place to talk about the validity of a star movie, we have a thread dedicated to that.
2) Currently there are no rules regarding a published movie changing from Vault to Moon or back. Such a system has merits. The problem I have with it is that I feel like it invalidates the submission voting system. I worry that there will be little point in people contributing with comments/feedback/votes because we can just publish as a vault and see how it goes. Also, I think the rating system is far from accurate and not as informative as a submission thread + votes in gauging the quality of a movie. I'm on the fence about the issue, and as such have chosen inaction for now.
I will allow for retroactive inclusion of older publications that, in the past, only completed part of the game but did so under fastest-time conditions. This does not change the current rule that the movie must be complete to be accepted.
I will also rewrite the Vault page to reflect this.