Enjoy the comparison video:
Japanese versional Contra called "魂斗羅", I use this version and this version can save time in cut scenes. Use two players to finish this game as soon as possible.
  • Emulator used: FCE Ultra 0.98.15
  • Uses two players
  • Aims for fastest real time
  • Allows death
  • Uses programming errors
At level 2, making super fire is very important, control every frame and control S-gun bullets can make bullets in a line.
At level 3, making full use of double-floor jump. Three special double-floor jump point in it.
At level 4, in third stage, re-fire can be more faster. At boss stage, 1P helps 2P to destroy the boss.
At level 6, 1P is a leader in front of 2P, making full use of S gun and let boss to eat every bullets.
At level 8, mini boss and final boss are recording in single-frame.
I didn't use double S gun in level 4, it makes lags and waste lots of time, so just 1P use upgraded S gun.
Special thanks to: Xipo韩晖 helps me to research this TAS.

klmz: Claimed and replaced the submission file with one starting from power-on without an embedded savestate.
feos: Added YouTube module.
klmz: Accepted as an improvement to the published Movie [797] NES Contra (Japan) "2 players" by adelikat in 08:57.98. Congratulations!

Brandon: Publication underway.


Former player
Joined: 8/31/2009
Posts: 236
Voted yes. Improving Contra is pretty impressive and the run looked great!
Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5777
Location: Away
This run is somewhat underappreciated (for one, I've yet to see a comment from adelikat), but it does raise some doubts whether it can't be pushed further. If stage 6 is indeed slower it may be because player 2 lagged behind too much, making the screen scroll longer (in which case it would probably make sense to suicide p2 at some of the vertical jumping sections). Then again, there might have been another reason. Can the jumping height glitch normally used in stage 2 be used elsewhere? Also, player 2 needs more attention. This run perfectly encapsulates stylish and entertaining interaction between two players. There might be less opportunities for that in Contra, but I think more good things could be done. That being said, I vote yes. Improving upon one of the better and more researched runs by adelikat is no easy feat, especially for the first submission.
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
NitroGenesis
He/Him
Editor, Experienced player (556)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
I saw a couple of spots where you had 1 lag frame morethen adelikat. Other then that yes
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.
mklip2001
He/Him
Editor
Joined: 6/23/2009
Posts: 2227
Location: Georgia, USA
I'm a big fan of seeing boss improvements, especially in the base levels. Nice job! I hope we'll see more movies from you :-)
Used to be a frequent submissions commenter. My new computer has had some issues running emulators, so I've been here more sporadically. Still haven't gotten around to actually TASing yet... I was going to improve Kid Dracula for GB. It seems I was beaten to it, though, with a recent awesome run by Hetfield90 and StarvinStruthers. (http://tasvideos.org/2928M.html.) Thanks to goofydylan8 for running Gargoyle's Quest 2 because I mentioned the game! (http://tasvideos.org/2001M.html) Thanks to feos and MESHUGGAH for taking up runs of Duck Tales 2 because of my old signature! Thanks also to Samsara for finishing a Treasure Master run. From the submission comments:
Shoutouts and thanks to mklip2001 for arguably being the nicest and most supportive person on the forums.
Brandon
He/Him
Editor, Player (191)
Joined: 11/21/2010
Posts: 914
Location: Tennessee
feos wrote:
Comparison video: http://www.mediafire.com/?yl43u3f7t1ykhd1 Upload it to Archive.org, I failed it myself.
Do you mean that this is the SD you want to use? Did you derive a 512kb for it? If not, could you let NitroGenesis claim this like he wanted to? Also, any suggested screenshots?
All the best, Brandon Evans
NitroGenesis
He/Him
Editor, Experienced player (556)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
IDK if a comparision is the real SD we want to use. I just wasn't sure if feos was making a real SD or whatever. I have dumped this and started encoding it, they should be up by tomorrow night at the latest.
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.
adelikat
He/Him
Emulator Coder, Site Developer, Site Owner, Expert player (3573)
Joined: 11/3/2004
Posts: 4754
Location: Tennessee
moozooh wrote:
(for one, I've yet to see a comment from adelikat)
Sorry, very busy few weeks for me and I only just now have a stable internet connection.
If stage 6 is indeed slower it may be because player 2 lagged behind too much, making the screen scroll longer (in which case it would probably make sense to suicide p2 at some of the vertical jumping sections). Then again, there might have been another reason.
It is probably slower because the flames on that level are on a global timer that starts on power-on, so he has no way to manipulate their behavior, thus some of his improvements got nullified
Can the jumping height glitch normally used in stage 2 be used elsewhere?
The jump glitch is in stage 3 not 2, and it is a peculiarity of the vertical scrolling that is unique to that level
Also, player 2 needs more attention. This run perfectly encapsulates stylish and entertaining interaction between two players. There might be less opportunities for that in Contra, but I think more good things could be done.
Every jump costs one frame in this game (as opposed to Super C), and there is not much wait time either, so this game doesn't lend itself as well to 2 player interaction. That being said, I do feel it could be done better than this movie (as well as my movie).
That being said, I vote yes. Improving upon one of the better and more researched runs by adelikat is no easy feat, especially for the first submission.
Indeed, this is one of the more challenging games I've TASed, and one of my top 5 proudest TASes. Good job on an unexpected improvement. I thoroughly enjoyed watching, thank you!
It's hard to look this good. My TAS projects
Joined: 5/29/2004
Posts: 757
It was fast... but it looked... meh. My reasoning of that is due to the fact that there's tons of wasted shots. The Bases being the main offender of it. I mean it was phenomenal except fpr that as it looked.. sloppy.. amateurish.. like a normal player playing an otherwise brilliant looking game. So voted high meh.. because if it was well done technically.. but crap on the entertainment in those 2 core areas. :( Mr. Kelly R. Flewin
Mr. Kelly R. Flewin Just another random gamer ---- <OmnipotentEntity> How do you people get bored in the span of 10 seconds? Worst ADD ever.
Site Admin, Skilled player (1254)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11475
Location: Lake Char­gogg­a­gogg­man­chaugg­a­gogg­chau­bun­a­gung­a­maugg
I wasn't going to produce the publishable SD (I never do), I've only made the same thing as for HappyLee's 1-frame improvement. But this my video has a wrong Logo. Also, there can't be a DeDuped analog of it because it was made for watching in VirtuakDub & has framecounter. Also, I don't feel to reencode it, only if someone tells me exactly how to resplice the ready vid with new Logo (for mp4).
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Player (210)
Joined: 7/7/2006
Posts: 798
Location: US
The "missed shots" are absolutely necessary to construct the spread gun into a beam to defeat things optimally. I only saw one or two stray shots being made that were not necessary to construct the beam, and they seemed like okay choices to me. After watching this run, I then rewatched adelikat's run mostly to compare entertainment choices.
adelikat wrote:
Every jump costs one frame in this game (as opposed to Super C), and there is not much wait time either, so this game doesn't lend itself as well to 2 player interaction. That being said, I do feel it could be done better than this movie (as well as my movie).
I tend to agree with adelikat's assessment of the entertainment value. This run is very easily of the same quality of entertainment as the previous run. I was actually having trouble visually discerning differences between them to be honest. It's definitely solid on the entertainment portion, though probably with a bit of room for improvement. The technical quality is probably very good, being that it beats the previous submission. I'd speculate that it is probably faster in all comparable portions, and that any time lost is due to universal timers and limiting game mechanics. It would take someone very knowledgeable on the game mechanics to confirm that, though. Definite yes vote.
Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5777
Location: Away
Mr. Kelly R. Flewin wrote:
It was fast... but it looked... meh. My reasoning of that is due to the fact that there's tons of wasted shots. The Bases being the main offender of it. I mean it was phenomenal except fpr that as it looked.. sloppy.. amateurish.. like a normal player playing an otherwise brilliant looking game.
Unfortunately those wasted shots are unavoidable as explained earlier on this page. It's done so that the Spreader shoots a constant stream of bullets as opposed do dispersed bursts, and is actually very hard to achieve. Edit: Gah, beat by Kirkq.
adelikat wrote:
The jump glitch is in stage 3 not 2, and it is a peculiarity of the vertical scrolling that is unique to that level
Oh right, stage 3... I always forget about the Bases. :D
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Brandon
He/Him
Editor, Player (191)
Joined: 11/21/2010
Posts: 914
Location: Tennessee
I'll take an SD / 512kb from anyone who uploads it. Someone just has to do it. If no one wants to, I will. Just let me know of your intentions, NitroGenesis and feos.
All the best, Brandon Evans
NitroGenesis
He/Him
Editor, Experienced player (556)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
I've encoded this - but right now I'm at work lol. will upload to archive tonight.
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.
Site Admin, Skilled player (1254)
Joined: 4/17/2010
Posts: 11475
Location: Lake Char­gogg­a­gogg­man­chaugg­a­gogg­chau­bun­a­gung­a­maugg
Brandon, I NEVER make publishable SDs or 512s.
Warning: When making decisions, I try to collect as much data as possible before actually deciding. I try to abstract away and see the principles behind real world events and people's opinions. I try to generalize them and turn into something clear and reusable. I hate depending on unpredictable and having to make lottery guesses. Any problem can be solved by systems thinking and acting.
Brandon
He/Him
Editor, Player (191)
Joined: 11/21/2010
Posts: 914
Location: Tennessee
OK, that settles it; I'll wait on NitroGenesis's SD / 512kb files. Please don't forget to attach a torrent to the SD along with the length of the SD.
All the best, Brandon Evans
NitroGenesis
He/Him
Editor, Experienced player (556)
Joined: 12/24/2009
Posts: 1873
YoungJ1997lol wrote:
Normally i would say Yes, but thennI thought "its not the same hack" so ill stick with meh.
Brandon
He/Him
Editor, Player (191)
Joined: 11/21/2010
Posts: 914
Location: Tennessee
Anybody have a screenshot?
All the best, Brandon Evans
Brandon
He/Him
Editor, Player (191)
Joined: 11/21/2010
Posts: 914
Location: Tennessee
This is based on Ilari's suggestion, optimized: y/n?
All the best, Brandon Evans
Skilled player (1326)
Joined: 9/7/2007
Posts: 1354
Location: U.S.
Looks nice.
Senior Moderator
Joined: 8/4/2005
Posts: 5777
Location: Away
y
Warp wrote:
Edit: I think I understand now: It's my avatar, isn't it? It makes me look angry.
Post subject: Movie published
TASVideoAgent
They/Them
Moderator
Joined: 8/3/2004
Posts: 15584
Location: 127.0.0.1
This movie has been published. The posts before this message apply to the submission, and posts after this message apply to the published movie. ---- [1783] NES Contra (Japan) "2 players" by zyr2288 in 08:51.73
Publisher
Joined: 4/23/2009
Posts: 1283
Here is a 4x encode requested by AngerFist (MP4): http://www.mediafire.com/?cw58gonx93lwyq1